I never got exposure to Ayn Rand until I read the book "Atlas Shrugged" in the early 90's. There was a talk show host named Neil Boortz that was encouraging us to read this book and Frederick Bastiat "The Law". The book was loong read but it stuck with me especially with the part about Hank Rearden forced to use the "Rearden Metal" as the state dictated not as the market dictated. They were using his sweat for their own purposes and it wasn't to the benefit of Rearden Metal. he had a lot of government interference in his business and it seemed that the producers were were supporting the system and there were a lot of "receivers" of government largesse's and they were relying on the producers to keep working. Atlas shrugged was on the premise that the producers or Atlas are carrying the full load and shrugged was when they finally decided to say "Screw it" and shrugged off the burden of carrying society and "
Going Galt"
Ayn Rand was a very wordy author, nothing wrong with that for it was her style. She was very familiar with tyranny for she had been born in Russia and was there when the Bolsheviks(or the Reds) took over from the white Russians.
To All Innocent Fifth Columnists
Ayn Rand - 1941
You who read this represent the greatest danger to America.
No matter what the outcome of the war in Europe may be,
Totalitarianism has already won a complete victory in many American
minds and conquered all of our intellectual life. You have helped it to
win.
Perhaps it is your right to destroy civilization and bring
dictatorship to America, but not unless you understand fully what you
are doing.
If that is what you want to do, say so openly, at
least to your own conscience, and we who believe in freedom will fight
you openly.
But the tragedy of today is that you — who are
responsible for the coming Totalitarian dictatorship of America — you do
not know your own responsibility. You would be the first to deny the
active part you're playing and proclaim your belief in freedom, in
civilization, in the American way of life. You are the most dangerous
kind of Fifth Columnist — an innocent subconscious Fifth Columnist. Of
such as you is the Kingdom of Hitler and of Stalin.
You do not believe this? Check up on yourself. Take the test we offer you here.
1. Are you the kind who considers ten minutes of his time too valuable to read this and give it some thought?
2. Are you the kind who sits at home and moans over the state of the world — but does nothing about it?
3. Are you the kind who says that the future is predestined by
something or other, something he can't quite name or explain and isn't
very clear about, but the world is doomed to dictatorship and there's
nothing anyone can do about it?
4. Are you the kind who says that he wishes he could do something, he'd be so eager to do something — but what can one man do?
5. Are you the kind who are so devoted to your own career, your family,
your home or your children that you will let the most unspeakable
horrors be brought about to destroy your career, your family, your home
and your children — because you are too busy now to prevent them?
Which one of the above are you? A little of all?
But are you really too busy to think?
Who "determines" the future? You're very muddled on that, aren't you?
What exactly is "mankind"? Is it a mystical entity with a will of its
own? Or is it you, and I, and the sum of all of us together? What force
is there to make history — except men, other men just like you? If there
are enough men who believe in a better future and are willing to work
for it, the future will be what they want it to be. You doubt this? Why
then, if the world is doomed to dictatorship, do the dictators spend so
much money and effort on propaganda? If history is predestined in their
favor, why don't Hitler and Stalin just ride the wave into the future
without any trouble? Doesn't it seem more probable that history will be
what the minds of men want it to be, and the dictators are smart enough
to prepare these minds in the way they want them, while we talk of
destiny and do nothing?
You say, what can one man do? When the Communists came to power
in Russia, they were a handful of eighteen men. Just eighteen. In a
country of [170,000,000] population. They were laughed at and no one
took them seriously. According to their own prophet, Karl Marx, Russia
was the last country in which Communism could be historically possible,
because of Russia's backwardness in industrial development. Yet they
succeeded. Because they knew what they wanted and went after it —
historical destiny or no historical destiny. Adolf Hitler started the
Nazi Party in Germany with seven men. He was laughed at and considered a
harmless crank. People said that after the Versailles Treaty Germany
could not possibly become a world power again, not for centuries. Yet
Hitler succeeded. Because he knew what he wanted and went after it —
history or no history. Shall we believe in mystical fates or do
something about the future?
If you are one of those who have had
a full, busy, successful life and are still hard at work making money —
stop for one minute of thought. What are you working for? You have
enough to keep you in comfort for the rest of your days. But you are
working to insure your children's future. Well, what are you leaving to
your children? The money, home, or education you plan to leave them will
be worthless or taken away from them. Instead, your legacy will be a
Totalitarian America, a world of slavery, of starvation, of
concentration camps and of firing squads. The best part of your life is
behind you — and it was lived in freedom. But your children will have
nothing to face save their existence as slaves. Is that what you want
for them? If not, it is still up to you. There is time left to abort it —
but not very much time. You take out insurance to protect your
children, don't you? How much money and working effort does that
insurance cost you? If you put one-tenth of the money and time into
insuring against your children's future slavery — you would save them
and save for them everything else which you intend to leave them and
which they'll never get otherwise.
Don't delude yourself by
minimizing the danger. You see what is going on in Europe and what it's
doing to our own country and to your own private life. What other proof
do you need? Don't say smugly that "it can't happen here." Stop and look
back for a moment.
The first Totalitarian dictatorship happened
in Russia. People said: well, Russia was a dark, backward, primitive
nation where anything could happen — but it could not happen in any
civilized country.
The next Totalitarian dictatorship happened
in Italy — one of the oldest civilized countries of Europe and the
mother of European culture. People said: well, the Italians hadn't had
much experience in democratic self-government, but it couldn't happen
anywhere else.
The next Totalitarian dictatorship happened in
Germany — the country of philosophers and scientists, with a long record
of the highest cultural achievements. People said: well, Germany was
accustomed to autocracy, and besides there's the Prussian character, and
the last war, etc. — but it could not happen in any country with a
strong democratic tradition.
Could it happen in France? People would have laughed at you had
you asked such a question a year ago. Well, it has happened in France —
France, the mother of freedom and of democracy, France, the most
independent-minded nation on earth.
Well?
What price
your smug self-confidence? In the face of millions of foreign money and
foreign agents pouring into our country, in the face of one step after
another by which our country is [moving] closer to Totalitarianism — you
do nothing except say: "It can't happen here." Do you hear the
Totalitarians answering you — "Oh, yeah?"
Don't delude yourself with slogans and meaningless historical
generalizations. It can happen here. It can happen anywhere. And a
country's past history has nothing to do with it. Totalitarianism is not
a new product of historical evolution. It is older than history. It is
the attempt of the worthless and the criminal to seize control of
society. That element is always there, in any country. But a healthy
society gives it no chance. It is when the majority in a country becomes
weak, indifferent and confused that a criminal minority, beautifully
organized like all gangs, seizes the power. And once that power is
seized it cannot be taken back for generations. Fantastic as it may seem
to think of a dictatorship in the United States, it is much easier to
establish such a dictatorship than to overthrow it. With modern
technique and modern weapons at its disposal, a ruthless minority can
hold millions in slavery indefinitely. What can one thousand
unorganized, unarmed men do against one man with a machine gun?
And the tragedy of today is that by remaining unorganized and mentally
unarmed we are helping to bring that slavery upon ourselves. By being
indifferent and confused, we are serving as innocent Fifth Columnists of
our own destruction.
There is no personal neutrality in the
world today. Repeat that and scream that to yourself. In all great
issues there are only two sides — and no middle. You are alive or you
are dead, but you can't be "neither" or "in between." You are honest or
you are not — and there is no neutral "half-honest." And so, you are
against Totalitarianism — or you are for it. There is no intellectual
neutrality.
The Totalitarians do not want your active support.
They do not need it. They have their small, compact, well-organized
minority and it is sufficient to carry out their aims. And they want
from you is your indifference. The Communists and the Nazis have stated
repeatedly that the indifference of the majority is their best ally.
Just sit at home, pursue your private affairs, shrug about world
problems — and you are the most effective Fifth Columnist that can be
devised. You're doing your part as well as if you took orders
consciously from Hitler or from Stalin. And so, you're in it, whether
you want to be or not, you're helping the world towards destruction,
while moaning and wondering what makes the world such as it is today.
You do.
The Totalitarians have said: "Who is not against us, is for us." There is no personal neutrality.
And since you are involved, and have to be, what do you prefer? To do
what you're doing and help the Totalitarians? Or to fight them?
But in order to fight, you must understand. You must know exactly what
you believe and you must hold to your faith honestly, consistently, and
all the time. A faith assumed occasionally, like Sunday clothes, is of
no value. Communism and Nazism are a faith. Yours must be as strong and
clear as theirs. They know what they want. We don't. But let us see how,
before it is too late, whether we have a faith, what it is and how we
can fight for it.
First and above all: what is Totalitarianism?
We all hear so much about it, but we don't understand it. What is the
most important point, the base, the whole heart of both Communism and
Nazism? It is not the "dictatorship of the proletariat," nor the
nationalization of private property, nor the supremacy of the "Aryan"
race, nor anti-Semitism. These things are secondary symptoms, surface
details, the effects and not the cause. What is the primary cause,
common to both Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, and all other dictators,
past, present, and future? One idea — and one only: That the State is
superior to the individual. That the Collective holds all rights and the
individual has none. Stop here. This is the crucial point. What you
think of this will determine whether you are a mental Fifth Columnist or
not. This is the point which allows no compromise. You must choose one
or the other. There is no middle. Either you believe that each
individual man has value, dignity and certain inalienable rights which
cannot be sacrificed for any cause, for any purpose, for any collective,
for any number of other men whatsoever. Or else you believe that a
number of men — it doesn't matter what you call it: a collective, a
class, a race or a State — holds all rights, and any individual man can
be sacrificed if some collective good — it doesn't matter what you call
it: better distribution of wealth, racial purity or the Millennium —
demands it. Don't fool yourself. Be honest about this. Names don't
matter. Only the basic principle matters, and there is no middle choice.
Either man has individual, inalienable rights — or he hasn't.
Your intentions don't count. If you are willing to believe that men
should be deprived of all rights for a good cause — you are a
Totalitarian. Don't forget, Stalin and Hitler sincerely believe that
their causes are good. Stalin thinks that he is helping the downtrodden,
and Hitler thinks that he is serving his country as a patriot. They are
good causes, both of them, aren't they? Then what creates the horrors
of Russia and of Germany? What is destroying all civilization? Just this
one idea — that to a good cause everything can be sacrificed; that
individual men have no rights which must be respected; that what one
person believes to be good can be put over on the others by force.
And if you — in the privacy of your own mind — believe so strongly in
some particular good of yours that you would be willing to deprive men
of all rights for the sake of this good, then you are as guilty of all
the horrors of today as Hitler and Stalin. These horrors are made
possible only by men who have lost all respect for single, individual
human beings, who accept the idea that classes, races, and nations
matter, but single persons do not, that a majority is sacred, but a
minority is dirt, that herds count, but Man is nothing. Where do you
stand on this? There is no middle ground.
If you accept the
Totalitarian idea, if the words "State" or "Collective" are sacred to
you, but the word "Individual" is not — stop right here. You don't have
to read further. What we have to say is not for you — and you are not
for us. Let's part here — but be honest, admit that you are a
Totalitarian and go join the Communist Party or the German-American
Bund, because they are the logical end of the road you have chosen, and
you will end up with one or the other, whether you know it now or not.
But if you are a Humanitarian and a Liberal — in the real, not the
prostituted sense of these words — you will say with us that Man, each
single, solitary, individual Man, has a sacred value which you respect,
and sacred inalienable rights which nothing must take away from him.
You believe this? You agree with us that this is the heart of true
Americanism, the basic principle upon which America was founded and
which made it great — the Rights of Man and the Freedom of Man? But do
you hear many voices saying this today?
Do you read many books
saying this? Do you see many prominent men preaching this? Do you know a
single publication devoted to this belief or a single organization
representing it? You do not. Instead, you find a flood of words, of
books, of preachers, publications, and organizations which, under very
clever "Fronts," work tirelessly to sell you Totalitarianism. All of
them are camouflaged under very appealing slogans: they scream to you
that they are defenders of "Democracy," of "Americanism," of "Civil
Liberties," etc. Everybody and anybody uses these words — and they have
no meaning left. They are empty generalities and boob-catchers. There is
only one real test that you can apply to all these organizations: ask
yourself what is the actual result of their work under the glittering
bromides? What are they really selling you, what are they driving at? If
you ask this, you will see that they are selling you Collectivism in
one form or another.
They preach "Democracy" and then make a
little addition — "Economic Democracy" or a "Broader Democracy" or a
"True Democracy", and demand that we turn all property over to the
Government; "all property" means also "all rights"; let everybody hold
all rights together — and nobody have any right of any kind
individually. Is that Democracy or is it Totalitarianism? You know of a
prominent woman commentator who wants us all to die for Democracy — and
then defines "true" Democracy as State Socialism [probably a reference
to Dorothy Thompson].
You have heard Secretary [Harold] Ickes
define a "true" freedom of the press as the freedom to express the views
of the majority. You have read in a highly respectable national monthly
the claim that the Bill of Rights, as taught in our schools, is
"selfish": that a "true" Bill of Rights means not demanding any rights
for yourself, but your giving these rights to "others." God help us,
fellow Americans, are we blind? Do you see what this means? Do you see
the implications?
And this is the picture wherever you look.
They "oppose" Totalitarianism and they "defend" Democracy — by preaching
their own version of Totalitarianism, some form of "collective good,"
"collective rights," "collective will," etc. And the one thing which is
never said, never preached, never upheld in our public life, the one
thing all these "defenders of Democracy" hate, denounce, and tear down
subtly, gradually, systematically — is the principle of Individual
Rights, Individual Freedom, Individual Value. That is the principle
against which the present great world conspiracy is directed. That is
the heart of the whole world question. That is the only opposite of
Totalitarianism and our only defense against it. Drop that — and what
difference will it make what name you give to the resulting society? It
will be Totalitarianism — and all Totalitarians are alike, all come to
the same methods, the same slavery, the same bloodshed, the same
horrors, no matter what noble slogan they start under, as witness Soviet
Russia and Nazi Germany.
Principles are much more consistent
than men. A basic principle, once accepted, has a way of working itself
out to its logical conclusion — even against the will and to the great
surprise of those who accepted it. Just accept the idea that there are
no inalienable individual rights — and firing squads, executions without
trial, and a Gestapo or a G. P. U. will follow automatically — no
matter who holds the power, no matter how noble and benevolent his
intentions. That is a law of history. You can find any number of
examples. Can you name one [counter-example]? Can you name one instance
where absolute power — in any hands — did not end in absolute horror?
And — for God's sake, fellow Americans, let's not be utter morons, let's
give our intelligence a small chance to function and let's recognize
the obvious — what is absolute power? It's a power which holds all
rights and has to respect none. Does it matter whether such a power is
held by a self-appointed dictator or by an elected representative body?
The power is the same and its results will be the same. Look through all
of history. Look at Europe. Don't forget — they still hold "elections"
in Europe. Don't forget, Hitler was elected.
Now, if you see how
completely intellectual Totalitarianism is already in control of our
country, if you see that there is no action and no organization to
defend the only true anti-Totalitarian principle, the principle of
individual rights, you will realize that there is only one thing for us
to do: to take such action and to form such an organization. If you are
really opposed to Totalitarianism, to all of it, in any shape, form, or
color — you will join us. We propose to unite all men of good will who
believe that Freedom is our most precious possession, that it is greater
than any other consideration whatsoever, that no good has ever been
accomplished by force, that Freedom must not be sacrificed to any other
ideal, and that Freedom is an individual, not a collective entity.
We do not know how many of us there are left in the world. But we think
there are many more than the Totalitarians suspect. We are the
majority, but we are scattered, unorganized, silenced and helpless. The
Totalitarians are an efficient, organized, and very noisy minority. They
have seized key positions in our intellectual life and they make it
appear as if they are the voice of America. They can, if left unchecked,
highjack America into dictatorship. Are we going to let them get away
with it? They are not the voice of America. We are. But let us be heard.
To be heard, however, we must be organized. This is not a
paradox. Individualists have always been reluctant to form any sort of
organization. The best, the most independent, the hardest working, the
most productive members of society have always lived and worked alone.
But the incompetent and the unscrupulous have organized. The world today
shows how well they have organized. And so, we shall attempt what has
never been attempted before — an organization against organization. That
is — an organization to defend us all from the coming compulsory
organization which will swallow all of society; an organization to
defend our rights, including the right not to belong to any forced
organization; an organization, not to impose our ideology upon anyone,
but to prevent anyone from imposing his ideology upon us by physical or
social violence.
Are you with us?
If you realize that
the world is moving toward disaster, but see no effective force to avert
it — If you are eager to join in a great cause and accept a great
faith, but find no such cause or faith offered to you anywhere today —
If you are not one of those doomed jellyfish to whom the word "Freedom" means nothing —
If you cannot conceive of yourself living in a society without personal
freedom, a society in which you will be told what to do, what to think,
what to feel, in which your very life will be only a gift from the
Collective, to be revoked at its pleasure at any time —
If you
cannot conceive of yourself surrendering your freedom for any collective
good whatsoever, and do not believe that any such good can ever be
accomplished by such a surrender —
If you believe in your own
dignity and your own value, and hold that such a belief is not
"selfish," but is instead your greatest virtue, without which you are
worthless both to your fellow-men and to yourself —
If you
believe that it is vicious to demand that you should exist solely for
the sake of your fellow-men and grant them all and any right over you —
If you believe that it is vicious to demand everyone's sacrifice for
everyone else's sake, and that such a demand creates nothing but mutual
victims, without profiting anyone, neither society nor the individual —
If you believe that men can tell you what you must not do to them, but
can never assume the arrogance of telling you what you must do, no
matter what their number —
If you believe in majority rule only
with protection for minority rights, both being limited by inalienable
individual rights —
If you believe that the mere mention of "the
good of the majority" is not sufficient ground to justify any possible
kind of horror, and that those yelling loudest of "majority good" are
not necessarily the friends of mankind —
If you are sick of professional "liberals," "humanitarians,"
"uplifters" and "idealists" who would do you good as they see fit, even
if it kills you, whose idea of world benevolence is world slavery —
If you are sick, disgusted, disheartened, without faith, without direction, and have lost everything but your courage —
— come and join us.
There is so much at stake — and so little time left.
Let us have an organization as strong, as sure, as enthusiastic as any
the Totalitarians could hope to achieve. Let us follow our faith as
consistently as they follow theirs. Let us offer the world our
philosophy of life. Let us expose all Totalitarian propaganda in any
medium and in any form. Let us answer any argument, every promise, every
"Party Line" of the Totalitarians. Let us drop all compromise, all
cooperation or collaboration with those preaching any brand of
Totalitarianism in letter or in spirit, in name or in fact. Let us have
nothing to do with "Front" organizations, "Front" agents or "Front"
ideas. We do not have to proscribe them by law. We can put them out of
existence by social boycott. But this means — no compromise. There is no
compromise between life and death. You do not make deals with the black
plague. Let us touch nothing tainted with Totalitarianism. Let us tear
down the masks, bring them out into the open and — leave them alone.
Very strictly alone. No "pro-Soviet" or "pro-Nazi" members of the board
in our organization. No "benevolent" Trojan horses. Let us stick
together as they do. They silence us, they force us out of public life,
they fill key positions with their own men. Let us stick together — and
they will be helpless to continue. They have millions of foreign money
on their side. We have the truth.
As a first step and a first declaration of what we stand for, we offer you the following principles:
We believe in the value, the dignity and the freedom of Man. We believe:
— That each man has inalienable rights which cannot be taken from him
for any cause whatsoever. These rights are life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness.
— That the right of life means that man cannot be deprived of his life for the convenience of any number of other men.
— That the right of liberty means freedom of individual decision,
individual choice, individual judgment and individual initiative; it
means also the right to disagree with others.
— That the right
to the pursuit of happiness means man's freedom to choose what
constitutes his own private, personal happiness and to work for its
achievement; that such a pursuit is neither evil nor reprehensible, but
honorable and good; and that a man's happiness is not to be prescribed
to him by any other man nor by any number of other men.
— That
these rights have no meaning unless they are the unconditional,
personal, private possession of each man, granted to him by the fact of
his birth, held by him independently of all other men, and limited only
by the exercise of the same rights by other men.
— That the only
just, moral and beneficent form of society is a society based upon the
recognition of these inalienable individual rights.
— That the State exists for Man, and no Man for the State.
— That the greatest good for all men can be achieved only through the
voluntary cooperation of free individuals for mutual benefit, and not
through a compulsory sacrifice of all for all.
— That
"voluntary" presupposes an alternative and a choice of opportunities;
and thus even a universal agreement of all men on one course of action
is neither free nor voluntary if no other course of action is open to
them.
— That each man's independence of spirit and other men's
respect for it have created all civilization, all culture, all human
progress and have benefited all mankind.
— That the greatest
threat to civilization is the spread of Collectivism, which demands the
sacrifice of all individual rights to collective rights and the
supremacy of the State over the individual.
— That the general
good which such Collectivism professes as its objective can never be
achieved at the sacrifice of man's freedom, and such sacrifice can lead
only to general suffering, stagnation, and degeneration.
— That
such conception of Collectivism is the greatest possible evil — under
any name, in any form, for any professed purpose whatsoever.
Such is our definition of Americanism and the American way of life.
The American way of life has always been based upon the Rights of Man,
upon individual freedom and upon respect for each human individual
personality. Through all its history, this has been the source of
America's greatness. This is the spirit of America which we dedicate
ourselves to defend and preserve.
In practical policy we shall
be guided by one basic formula: of every law and of every conception we
shall demand the maximum freedom for the individual and the minimum
power for the government necessary to achieve any given social
objective.
If you believe this, join us. If you don't — fight
us. Either is your privilege, but the only truly immoral act you can
commit is to agree with us, to realize that we are right — and then to
forget it and do nothing.
There is some excuse, little as it may
be, for an open, honest Fifth Columnist. There is none for an innocent,
passive, subconscious one. Of all the things we have said here to you,
we wish to be wrong on only one — our first sentence. Prove us wrong on
that. Join us.
The world is a beautiful place and worth fighting for. But not without Freedom.
and various meme's
