The musings of a politically incorrect dinosaur from a forgotten age where civility was the rule rather than the exception.
Webster
The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)
Friday, February 1, 2019
Some information on the U.S.S Nevada (BB-36)
I decided to do something on the Pearl Harbor battleships after doing the blog postings about the IJN Yamoto. I still think that it was ironic that me being an Army guy happen to like Naval history.
From her conception in 1911 to her survival at Pearl Harbor and use as a target for atomic testing, the battleship Nevada had
a remarkable career. She served all around the world in times of war
and peace, but it was her remarkable durability that strikes many
readers. The construction of Nevada was authorized in a period of rising tensions and the rapid introduction of new technologies. Not long after construction on Nevada began, that tension in Europe would lead to World War I.
The Nevada
was the first of a new class of US battleships to use triple gun
turrets and “all or nothing” armor. With 14-inch guns, the use of triple
turrets allowed more firepower to be put in the forward position. When
bigger guns were used with triple turrets, such as those on the British Nelson-class battleships, this created an often-unstable firing platform.
Later battleships like the Colorado had bigger caliber guns and went back to two turrets, and ships with more tonnage like the North Dakota could handle the weight of four turrets in superfiring position. On Nevada
though, three turrets gave the ship a decent mix of firepower, weight,
and speed. This development combined with the use of oil instead of coal
for fuel represented a leap in dreadnought technology at the time. The
“all or nothing” armor came from a new military philosophy regarding
potential threats. The increasing range and size of weapons often meant
that battles took place at longer ranges. So designers maximized armor
in the most likely areas to be targeted, while other areas of the ship
had little to no armor. This
allowed the overall tonnage of the ship to remain low, which improved
the ship’s speed. The design became standard around much of the world at
the time.
I can understand your fascination, these things were big, powerful, and could project a ton of whoop-ass. I visited the USS Iowa in San Pedro and I was impressed! I really would have loved to see it in WWII trim brimminng with anti-aircraft guns.
I can understand your fascination, these things were big, powerful,
ReplyDeleteand could project a ton of whoop-ass. I visited the USS Iowa in
San Pedro and I was impressed! I really would have loved to see
it in WWII trim brimminng with anti-aircraft guns.
Hey Unknown;
DeleteYeah I am fascinated, I and my son did see the USS Alabama in Mobile and that ship was kitted out in its WWII livery.
It was a true heavyweight in more ways than one!
ReplyDeleteHey Old NFO;
DeleteWould have been cool as a museum ship.
She should have led the Fleet into Tokyo Bay.
ReplyDelete