Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Thursday, May 11, 2023

Russia and the International Standard of Airworthiness and Maintenance.

 I had "Blogged" about Russian aviation sending their commercial aviation assets to Iran for heavy maintenance, as Russia tries to keep their western based planes flying.  The longer this goes on the harder it will be to reconcile the planes with the manufacturer and the recommended maintenance schedule.  I'm pretty sure those plane will wound up being scrapped,

 

Aeroflot

Any hope of a quick resolution in the Russia-Ukraine war is long gone. 

Nearly 15 months and counting since Russia invaded its neighbor, the idea that anything affected can be easily reset to its pre-war status is gone, too. That includes the war’s ramifications on commercial aviation.

The wave of sanctions that Russia’s invasion triggered had immediate consequences for the country’s airline industry. Belarus, which served as a base for the invasion, has been hit, too. 

Forget adding new or used Western-built aircraft to the Russian or Belarussian fleets. Everything from spare parts to airworthiness directives are no longer available legally for the existing fleets.

This means hundreds of aircraft—the backbone of Russia’s commercial fleet—could no longer be maintained to internationally agreed-upon standards. The restrictions extend to some Russian-built aircraft because of their reliance on Western suppliers.

The sanctions came with flight bans that have gutted Russia’s route networks. Russian carriers moved 25% fewer people in 2022 than 2019, a recent Carnegie Endowment analysis found. The share of international traffic has fallen from 43% to 10%—a direct result of the sanctions.

As the figures show, however, the sanctions, while damaging, have hardly put Russia on a commercial aviation island. Aeroflot’s website shows flights to a handful countries beyond Russia’s borders, including China, Egypt, India, Thailand, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

As a recent white paper from the Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) points out, permitting Russian carriers—or any carrier, for that matter—to fly into your airspace is far more than a political decision. It’s a regulatory one, with ramifications.

“State regulators have an obligation to carry out effective oversight over foreign operators flying in their territory, with closer scrutiny on aircraft registered in sanctioned states,” FSF noted.

The reasons are simple. Without access to spare parts and technical support, sanctioned carriers are forced to get creative.

“The disrupted supply of components may result in affected air operators from Russia and Belarus stripping parts from parked planes or being tempted to explore alternative unapproved sources or parts in order to continue flying,” FSF said. “Parts may even be swapped out and find their way to the [maintenance] facilities, possibly being accepted by regulators with weak oversight or those that lack the engineering competence to further scrutinize the paperwork.”

Software updates, which are fairly common on today’s advanced air transports, are no longer available. Russia’s official response? Permit aircraft on its registry to operate without them.

It’s not clear how regulators in the countries Russian carriers are still permitted to operate are handling their oversight obligations.

FSF sees little room for error.

“With the large number of prolonged sanctions, as well as U.S. Export Controls currently in place on Belarus and Russia, state regulators worldwide need to be fully aware of the current international sanctions in effect and their implications on aviation safety,” the foundation said. “States unable to adequately ensure safety and provide adequate safety oversight—particularly of aircraft registered in sanctioned states—should not allow these flights into their airspace.

Wednesday, May 10, 2023

Poland in interested in the KF-21 Program.

 I had "Blogged" about Poland upgrading their armed forces, with the Ukraine next door fighting the Russians, it is a big concern for Poland, unlike the Western Europe, the Eastern Europe hasn't forgotten what it is like to be under the boot of the Soviets, Er the Russians, and they want to make any forays as expensive as possible.

 

KF-21

Credit: DAPA

SEOUL–Polish defense prime Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa (PGZ) is eager to participate in South Korea’s KF-21 fighter program, with a letter of intent expected to be issued soon, South Korea broadcaster MBC has reported. 

This follows a visit by PGZ Board President Sebastian ChwaƂek to South Korea in April, when he toured the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA), Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) and Hanwha. 

MBC says Poland wants to enter the KF-21 program beginning in 2026, when the aircraft is due to go into production and also the start of the Blk 2 stage. Warsaw and Seoul are also said to be discussing payment terms, especially since Indonesia has not fulfilled its commitments. 

Indonesia is the sole co-development partner of the KF-21 and has contracted to pay KRW 1.7 trillion ($1.29 billion) to South Korea, although that has not been fully paid. 

It is also uncertain how the licensed production of 48 aircraft to Indonesia and technical sharing will proceed should Poland join the program and pay Indonesia’s share. 

In October 2022, an unnamed Polish military official told Aerospace DAILY that the country was interested in purchasing KF-21s and had requested a working meeting with KAI to share technical information. The official added that Poland was also interested in the South Korean-made Cheonryong air-Launched cruise missile and Hycore hypersonic scramjet missile that would be mounted on the KF-21.

Poland became the largest customer of South Korea’s defense systems in 2022 after it entered a multibillion deal to acquire 180 K2 main battle tanks, 212 K9 self-propelled howitzers and 48 FA-50 light fighters.

MBC says that PGZ and the Polish government will soon deliver a letter of intent (LOI) to the South Korean government and DAPA to jointly develop the KF-21. But DAPA said it has yet to receive the LOI and will review it according to its procedures when it arrives.

 

Tuesday, May 9, 2023

Busy...Busy....Busy...

 Got Home Late last night, and had to immediately get ready for work, We had fun in Florida, but it was a long drive and I didn't have anything ready for the blog.

I will have something up on Wednesday.


Monday, May 8, 2023

Monday Music "Africa" by Toto

I am still running "my favorite" songs thing, for the moment, I haven't settled on a new theme yet.  We are still in Florida, and will be returning today.  I try to avoid traveling on Sundays if possible( because EVERYONE Else is) kinda thing and the revenueers are more vigilant ;)

I remembered this song hitting in 1982 while I was a sophomore in high school.  When the song first came out, I didn't care for it much.  But the song kinda over the fullness of time grew on me.  Now I like hearing the song, partly because it reminds me of my high school time and the optimism of the Reagan era.
    



"Africa" is a hit single by rock band Toto, and is one of the band's most recognizable songs. It was included on their 1982 album Toto IV, and reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 chart in February 1983 and number three on the UK Singles Chart the same month. The song was written by the band's keyboardist/vocalist David Paich and drummer Jeff Porcaro.


The initial idea for the song came from David Paich. Jeff Porcaro explains the idea behind the song: "... a white boy is trying to write a song on Africa, but since he's never been there, he can only tell what he's seen on TV or remembers in the past."
David Paich said: "At the beginning of the '80s I watched a late night documentary on TV about all the terrible death and suffering of the people in Africa. It both moved and appalled me and the pictures just wouldn't leave my head. I tried to imagine how I'd feel about if I was there and what I'd do."
Musically the song took quite some time to assemble, as Paich and Porcaro explain:
"On 'Africa' you hear a combination of marimba with GS 1. The kalimba is all done with the GS 1; it's six tracks of GS 1 playing different rhythms. I wrote the song on CS-80, so that plays the main part of the entire tune."

"So when we were doing 'Africa', I set up a bass drum, snare drum and a hi-hat, and Lenny Castro set up right in front of me with a conga. We looked at each other and just started playing the basic groove. ... The backbeat is on 3, so it's a half-time feel, and it's 16th notes on the hi-hat. Lenny started playing a conga pattern. We played for five minutes on tape, no click, no nothing. We just played. And I was singing the bass line for 'Africa' in my mind, so we had a relative tempo. Lenny and I went into the booth and listened back to the five minutes of that same boring pattern. We picked out the best two bars that we thought were grooving, and we marked those two bars on tape...Maybe it would have taken two minutes to program that in the Linn, and it took about half an hour to do this. But a Linn machine doesn't feel like that!"

The music video was directed by Steve Barron. In the video, a researcher in a library (portrayed by band member David Paich) tries to match a scrap of a picture to the book from which it was torn out. As he continues his search, a black female librarian (Jenny Douglas-McRae) working at a desk takes occasional notice of him, while a native in the surrounding jungle begins to close in on the library. When the researcher finds a book entitled Africa, the native throws a spear, toppling stacks of books. Africa falls open to the page from which the scrap was torn, but a lantern lands on it and sets it on fire, after which the librarian's eyeglasses are shown falling to the floor. The scenes are inter-cut with shots of a spinning globe and the band performing atop a stack of hardcover books, in which Africa is the topmost.
This video also features Mike Porcaro on bass, replacing David Hungate, who had already left Toto before the video was made.
 

 

Sunday, May 7, 2023

"Martyrdom In The West Look Like"

 I'm on a mini Vacation, Its my 28th Anniversary, and the Spousal Unit wanted to get away so I didn't get a chance to blog yesterday.  She is a good women so I try to make time for her because we have been through a lot together and she is the center of my world.  We are in Florida and I will post a few things when I get back about some of the places we went to and of the beach, My Brother and my SIL live down here so it is easy to "drop in" and they do the same when they are in my neck of the woods.

     I got this off GAB.com, I post there, you can find me there at "Gab"  I am not there as much as I am here, Blogger is my main platform.  I am also on "Mewe" but that is another story.   I got this one from Gab, and there are some stuff that I do agree with the author and some things I don't.  The derogatory comments about the United States is one of the biggies, sure the .gov is hostile toward Christians, but the framework of laws can be used to protect us, whereas in other places there is no such legal protection and the Christians are at the mercy of whomever is in charge.  The Author brings up the subtle harassment of Christians and it is prevalent in society, all you have to do is look at what ever comes out from Hollyweird, if there is a bad person, it is invariably white, male, and Christian.  It is boilerplate.  I have commented to the spousal unit about that.  She sees the better angel of peoples nature and she doesn't agree with me because she is a really good person and I have seen the bad of society, the bad of people and have had bad things happen to me, I am much more jaded and cynical.  The Author does bring up some things I do agree with though and it has gotten worse in the past 20 years, Christians are the only group besides White males that you can openly mock safely in todays world and not worry about the twitter and outrage mobs going after you, Doxxing you and trying to get you fired.  In todays world it is like the powers that be is trying to push Christianity(unless they supported Liberal causes like whatever the pet cause of the left is for the day) and Judaism(unless they are openly liberal, and support the right causes) into the Darkness, but any other religion...No problem..."I used to say on my Blog" especially when obungler was president the "Unofficial" religion of the United States was islam, because .gov would go after anybody that said anything unkind about that religion.  


    Here is the article I got from Gab a couple of months ago and it got buried in my emails....hey, I get a lot of emails, I wanted to post it a lot sooner, but it didn't happen.   I am posting this without my mouse...somehow it and my mousepad vanished...I hope I left it at home, using the touchpad sucks, LOL

 

Martyrdom in Trashworld

The Psychological and Social Persecution of Christians in Current Year

By Pastor Andrew Isker

Most American Christians have been told their entire lives to be ready to give their lives for Jesus Christ. But the enemies of Christ in the modern globalist world are not going to feed you to lions or burn you at the stake. Instead, if you are a Christian in modern trashworld, your martyrdom will be psychological. Not only will this psychological torment happen to you, it already has begun.

Like many young Christians who first discovered the history of the Christian faith, I was inspired by the stories of martyrs. How could you not be filled with enthusiasm and passion hearing the examples of men and women who gladly went to their excruciating deaths, refusing to deny their Lord? Being thrown to lions, set on fire, beaten, tortured, imprisoned, and starved. I read Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing the history of Christian martyrs from the early church to the Reformation, and was filled with awe. After all, how could you not be?

Next, I read Tortured for Christ, by Richard Wurmbrand, the founder of Voice of the Martyrs, who spent 14 years imprisoned and tortured by Communists for his Christian faith. Wurmbrand was held in pitch-black and soundless solitary confinement for three years. He was regularly beaten and tortured and had the flesh from his feet torn off down to the bone. After being released once and told not to preach Christ, he immediately resumed his work in the underground church, preaching and teaching God’s Word, undeterred and without concern for what he had just experienced. And less than three years later, he was arrested and imprisoned again, only ending with a ransom being paid for his amnesty in 1964.

Stories like these that show the devotion of faithful Christians give us heroes to emulate. Of course, the second you begin to apply the lessons of Christian martyrs in our age, malicious people, often within the church, will attack you. College campuses are a window into the future 15 years down the road (or maybe five or ten—the pace has quickened considerably). When I was in college nearly 20 years ago, I began to see the growing hostility to the Christian faith.

At my four-year state university, professors would openly mock the Christian faith in class. It was never even tangentially related to the subject matter they were teaching. They despised evangelicals especially and blamed them for that iteration of “literally Hitler,” George W. Bush. When I spoke up and said, “I am a Christian, I disagree with you and don’t appreciate how you talk about what I believe,” I was met with derision from the professors and my classmates under the professor’s sway. When I would discuss such things with other conservative, evangelical Christians, some were sympathetic and shared similar experiences, while others would scoff and say, “that’s not real persecution. you have a ‘martyr complex.’”

It was at that point, despite not having a framework to articulate it, that I realized the battle lines that would be drawn over the next 15-20 years, not only within the culture at large but within the church. Only very recently, with the “Three Worlds of Evangelicalism” model of Aaron Renn, did the hostility to the Christian faith in our culture and the tepid response to it by many evangelicals begin to make sense. In that model, Renn outlines “positive, neutral, and negative worlds” where the larger culture views Christianity as something generally good (how the culture viewed Christianity until the 1990s), then something neither good nor bad (from the 90s until the mid-2010s), then finally something that is bad and low status (from the mid-2010s to the present). When I was in college, what Renn calls the “Negative World” had already arrived. If you were a Christian, you were unequivocally low-status. People would think you are an uncool loser, even if you came from money, wore the proper clothing, were good-looking, or possessed anything else that would give you social status; your Christian faith negated all of that.

After the Obergefell decision and definitely after the “mostly peaceful” summer of 2020, my experience in college in the early 2000s—Negative World—had finally arrived for everyone else. Now, simply being a Christian who believes the Bible is true and who desires to live a life according to the commands of Jesus Christ, is something which is a clear impediment to pursuing a “normal life.” A successful career, finding a spouse, and gaining the respect of your friends and neighbors, all of these become much more difficult to attain if you are a Christian living in Trashworld. Then, as now, the Christians devoted to collaborating with the enemies of Christ will say, “that’s not real persecution.” Of course, it is not the same as Richard Wurmbrand having the flesh of his feet torn off or Saint Bartholomew being skinned alive. No one would dare claim such a thing. Nevertheless, it is a real thing that is happening to us. You wouldn’t say to someone who just broke their leg and was on the ground writhing in pain, “get over yourself. I know someone in hospice with stage four cancer and has way more pain than you.” Only a monster would behave that way.

The fact is, outside of a few exceptional cases, the kind of martyrdom experienced by Christians in the past is not likely to take place here. That is not how the demonic Regime operates. Such overt, direct persecution that came at the hands of First Century Jews, Romans, medieval governments, French Jacobins, Bolsheviks, and Jihadists is not the kind of martyrdom we face. The demons that rule over us are not so direct and confrontational, not so masculine. No, the demons that rule over us are passive-aggressive and rely upon psychological and social manipulation to torment us.

Our persecution is and will increasingly be much more subtle and feminine. The difference between persecution then and now is like the difference between being bullied by Biff Tannen in Back to the Future and being bullied by the antagonists from Mean Girls. Rather than being brutalized, tortured, or murdered, you will be socially ostracized, you will be cut off from participation in the mainstream economy, your children will be taken from you and brainwashed, and all the while, the Christians who collaborate with the Regime will tell you “it isn’t happening.”

What makes modern persecution so insidious is that it doesn’t seem like it is happening, especially compared to the overt brutality prior Christians experienced. It is important to remember the words of the Apostle Paul that “all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived” (1 Timothy 3:12-13 NKJV). If you are a Christian, you will suffer persecution for your faith. There is no way around it. That persecution isn’t always going to come in the form of men with swords or guns at your door ready to torture and kill you. But if you are a faithful man in a godless world that rages against its Creator, you are the tangible, flesh and blood representative of that Creator it is raging against. You are going to suffer. The suffering you are going to face and many of us already face is the social exclusion and intense, unremitting psychological torment of a godless society that is almost designed to get you to apostatize from Christ. There are myriad vectors and mechanisms it employs. It will use your family to pry you away. It will use corporate financial power to dangle incentives for you to compromise just a little bit. It will rob you of your children, and then hold them hostage against you. Every message, from every corner of the world is a constant, 24/7 stream of that preaches the oh-so-subtle message of: “if you believe in Jesus Christ, if you believe the Bible is true, you are a loser and we hate you. You have no place in our society. We hope you kill yourself.” That is the subtext of every form of popular culture that Trashworld pumps out. You are not being killed and tortured, but your mind, soul, and spirit absolutely are. Trashworld has perfected a kind of persecution that is even worse than lighting you on fire or feeding you to a starving lion. It has industrialized a kind of persecution of the Christian that 1. doesn’t look “like persecution,” 2. when it is successful makes it appear as if the apostate one day woke up and freely chose to just stop believing in Jesus, and 3. therefore causes Christians to not have their guard up when they face it, leaving them totally vulnerable to its pernicious effects.

But what is the answer to this problem? It is to understand that you are at war against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places, no less than the saints of old. is to bear this suffering with dignity and resolve just as the heroic martyrs of the early church did. It doesn’t matter what faithless collaborating Christians say; they already have their reward. Just as St. Paul said we will suffer for pursuing a Christian life, fake Christians are going to mock us when that suffering comes. But those with eyes of faith understand we pursue a golden crown from the hands of our king. And though the scars of our persecution cannot be seen with eyes, it is a kind of suffering for the sake of the Lord Jesus Christ, one we should count as joy, having been found worthy to bear it. That is the perspective ancient Christians had of their suffering for the sake of Christ, and that is how we should view it as well. Whatever affliction we bear is adding to the suffering of Christ. Remaining faithful to Christ and losing out on career opportunities is a genuine sacrifice. Sacrificing a much more comfortable life so you can protect your children from those who seek to do them harm is a very real sacrifice. Being called a bigot, racist, homophobe, fascist, and every other slur because you refuse to bend the knee to anyone but He Who Rules at His Father’s Right Hand is a very real indignity and is very much worth it.

The Bible describes the suffering of Christians as filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions (Col. 1:24). It may not seem like it at all, but by suffering in this way, you are conquering. Just as the blood of Christ’s people spilled out does not fall on deaf ears but cries out to heaven, so also does the anguish and terror you experience for the sake of steadfastly holding to Christ. Your duty as a Christian is to band together with those who bear Christ’s name and build real, flesh-and-blood communities impervious to the terror of the “Negative World.” Christ’s enemies are forcing us to band together, which is what we must do. We must build our own society with our own economy within the one that is collapsing before our eyes. “Negative World” is not the end of the story. There have been “Negative Worlds” many times before, and they have all been overcome by the victory of Jesus Christ. So too, will the negative world of the Globalist American Empire.

 

Friday, May 5, 2023

Preliminary Report from the Waterbomber crash in Australia

 This was supposed to "drop" yesterday, but somehow I got the scheduler thingie off by a day.


   I clipped this off my 3rd party news I get in my email.

Boeing 737 firefighting tanker

Credit: Gene Blevins/ZUMA Wire/Alamy

SINGAPORE—The pilots of a Coulson Aviation Boeing 737-300 firefighting tanker tried to pull the aircraft out from a retardant drop before accelerating the engines, resulting in the aircraft clipping a ridgeline and then crashing. 

Both pilots survived the Feb. 6 incident in Western Australia. 

In a preliminary report released by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), the aircraft—call signed Bomber 139—was carrying out its third sortie for the day to suppress bushfires at Fitzgerald River National Park. The 737 was guided by two airborne observers, known as bird-dog aircrafts, to the drop site. 

Bomber 139 commenced the first drop at 400 ft., only releasing three-quarters of the tank, with the engines running at 70% N1, which is defined as the rotational speed of the engine’s low-pressure compressor. 

Following the checklist for the second drop, the co-pilot said the drop speed would be performed at 118 kt. During the second drop, the aircraft descended through 400 ft. at about 110 kt. with engines at 30%, or at high idle.

The captain started to advance the throttle levers two seconds before the aircraft’s rate of descent peaked at about 1,800 ft./min. and started to pitch the nose up. The pitch preceded the acceleration of the engines, which the ATSB said in their report resulted “in a reversal of the rate of descent, but also a decay of the airspeed.” 

By that time, at a radio altitude of about 28 ft. with the flaps at 40 deg., an increasing aircraft nose-up pitch attitude resulted in the angle of attack exceeding 20 deg., which triggered the stick shaker. 

The aircraft struck the ridgeline at an elevation of 222 ft., with the engines at 85-89% N1. The ATSB said Bomber 139 “only attained a positive rate of climb just before impact with terrain.” The agency said the co-pilot reported that “their focus of attention was likely on the airspeed indicator and radio altimeter” at the time.

After making contact with the ridgeline, the aircraft cleared a line of foliage before colliding with the ground a second time, stopping about 577 ft. from its initial point of contact. 

Chart

Accident sequence distances and elevations. Credit: ATSB

Following the collision, the pilots issued an all-stations mayday call and exited the aircraft via the pilot’s left-side window.

The ATSB will continue investigations focusing on communication procedures between the 737 and the bird-dog. Its probe will also examine the pilot’s crew resource management as well as the standards and safety margins for the 737 retardant drop.

As part of immediate measures, Coulson Aviation issued an operations bulletin to increase its minimum drop height from 150 ft. to 200 ft. and increase the target drop airspeed from 133 k


                                                 I pulled this off "youtube"


                                                 This was off a News Report.

Wednesday, May 3, 2023

Addendum to a prior post "The Public Prosecutor files an appeal in the AF 447 Case"

    I had "Blogged" about this one last week, and now there is an addition to the story...

      I don't know how I feel about this one, The Pilots messed up, not the plane or the airline, unless the pilots were representing the airline kinda logic.  I don't know what the end results is unless is a lot of money involved and the anger of the families wanting "their pound of flesh" no matter the cost.


Air France Flight 447 tail section

PARIS—France’s public prosecutor has launched an appeal 10 days after a Paris court verdict cleared Air France and Airbus of involuntary-manslaughter charges over the 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447. 

Flight AF447, an Airbus A330-200, was en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris on June 1, 2009, when around 4 hr. after takeoff and amid stormy weather, it crashed into the Atlantic killing all 228 passengers and crew on board.   

Lawyers representing the families of some of the 228 victims had been calling for a trial for many years. The court process that finished April 17 had begun in late 2022. The court found that while errors had been made by both Airbus and Air France, “no certain link of causality” could be established.   

The questions surrounding responsibility for the crash center on the pilots’ actions in the minutes before the accident and on their reactions to the faulty readings that were displayed as a result of problems with the aircraft’s pitot tubes. 

In July 2012, following a two-year search for the aircraft’s flight data recorders, an investigation by France’s Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses (BEA) concluded the flight crew had become disorientated and reacted incorrectly to faulty readings from the pitot tubes, which had become blocked by ice. 

French pilots’ union SNPL France ALPA said it was “profoundly relieved” at the announcement of an appeal.  

“The public prosecutor’s appeal will allow the Court of Appeal to examine once again the responsibilities of Airbus and Air France in this tragedy, guaranteeing the victims’ loved ones access to a second hearing, which is a fundamental right,” the union says. 

Air France declined to comment on the news that there would be a new appeal. Airbus says it “takes note” of the decision but has no further comment at this stage.

 

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

South Vietnam's Thermopylae

 I remembered reading about this several years ago, and the last stand of the ARVN Army.  The General was one of the two best general the ARVN had, the other was "Ngo Quang Truong",   I remember reading an article in a book about the Vietnam war I read in high school ( bought a copy in the 90's) when it discussed the ARVN Soldiers and the quote was "When they were lead well, they fought well"

   I took a picture off the page, here is the full page it is referring to.




I have known since the 80's that the democrats were the original apologist for the Soviet Union, they would take the side of the Soviets over the American issues.  I guess they would rather be "Red than dead".  The stuff continues, from my history it was the democrats that shafted the South Vietnamese when they wanted help and aid against the North Vietnamese and this culminated in the "Easter offensive" where the North overran the South and South Vietnam ceased to exist as a country.

 It was the Democrats that had all the hearings against the U.S. in the Vietnam war with the "Winter Soldier" where Flipper A.K.A. John Kerry made a bunch of lies against the U.S. Military because it was politically expedient for his budding career as a politician.  I always commented that to the democrats, it is Party First, then self, followed by Gaia and the country is the last priority.    President Nixon Promised the South that we would support them with supplies when we signed the "Paris Peace Accords" but Richard Nixon resigned rather than get impeached and President Ford pardoned him which was the right thing to do for the country, but he had no political capital to push the issue and the democrats were emboldened by this and since most of the democrats supported North Vietnam and protested American involvement in the war and actively supported the North with supplies and money and positive media coverage.When the South needed supplies and munitions for their military, it was voted down by the democrats and President Ford didn't have the political stroke to make it happen.

    I got this article from "Vietnam Cherries" a postings about the Vietnam War, I wish I could have asked my Dad about this since in the past I would have asked him about Vietnam War stuff because he was a Vietnam War Veteran.

The last major battle of the Vietnam War was fought at Xuan Loc, only 37 miles east by northeast of Saigon. In April 1975 the town was the eastern anchor of South Vietnam’s final line of defense against the North Vietnamese rush to the capital. That line ran west through Bien Hoa, just north of Saigon, to Tay Ninh, near the Cambodian border. Once it broke, Saigon was doomed—and with it the Republic of Vietnam itself.

When the North Vietnamese Army attacked Xuan Loc (pronounced Swan Lock) on April 9, the communists and almost everyone else expected the Army of the Republic of Vietnam’s 18th Division to collapse like a house of cards, as had so many other ARVN units during the NVA’s massive Spring Offensive of 1975. But ARVN forces under Brig. Gen. Le Minh Dao fought fiercely in a last-ditch effort to save their country. By the time Xuan Loc did fall 12 days later, most of the world was amazed at how well the ARVN had fought, and the NVA had paid a far steeper price than it expected. Indeed, the valiant stand at Xuan Loc by heavily outnumbered ARVN soldiers echoes the famed sacrifice of King Leonidas’ 300 Spartans facing Xerxes’ Persian masses at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. Greece. The Persians then marched south and captured Athens.

Xuan Loc, the capital of Long Khanh province, had always been a strategically sensitive place. The town sat astride the French-built Highway 1, near the junction with Highway 20. From Xuan Loc, Highway 1 ran almost 40 miles east until it reached the South China Sea, where it turned north and went up the coast past the Demilitarized Zone and on to Hanoi.

From March 1967 to January 1969 the U.S. 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment’s Blackhorse Base Camp was some 4 miles south of Xuan Loc. During that time, Highway 1 was relatively secure from Xuan Loc west toward the northern edge of Saigon. But since 1962 the road east to the coast had been shut down completely, as it ran through the heart of the May Tao “Secret Zone,” a mountainous area where the Viet Cong 5th Division was based and U.S. intelligence hadn’t penetrated. From November 1967 to early 1968, Operation Santa Fe, conducted by the U.S. 9th Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade, the 1st Australian Task Force and the ARVN 18th Division, attempted to open Highway 1 to the coast. Although the road was eventually opened, the VC 5th Division mostly avoided contact as it positioned itself for the Tet Offensive in late January 1968.

During the war, North Vietnam launched three major offensives against South Vietnam. The Tet Offensive of 1968 and the Easter Offensive of 1972 were military failures. The 1975 Spring Offensive would succeed. By that time, all U.S. forces were out of Vietnam, and legislation passed by Congress in June 1973 prohibited the use of government funds for military operations in Southeast Asia without congressional approval.

In 1975 North Vietnam, which had organized its army divisions into four corps, committed all four to attacks on the South. The NVA force in South Vietnam totaled 270,000 troops, 1,076 artillery pieces and mortars, 320 tanks and 250 other armored vehicles.

After successful probes in early 1975 in the northern sector of the South Vietnamese III Corps Tactical Zone (a military region encompassing Saigon and provinces to the north), the NVA on March 8 launched Campaign 275, directed at Ban Me Thuot, a provincial capital in the Central Highlands, part of the II Corps zone. The ARVN held out for eight days. When Ban Me Thuot fell, Pleiku and Kontum, also in the Central Highlands, were outflanked and cut off from the south. NVA forces quickly drove toward An Khe and the coast—effectively cutting South Vietnam in two. The NVA then took the northern I Corps zone cities of Hue and Da Nang, which fell on March 29.

VIETNAM (South). Da Nang. 1975. A soldier of the North Vietnamese army guards discarded US helicopters, after the city was occupied by the Communists.

ARVN units in those areas had quickly collapsed during the relentless NVA advance. They abandoned their positions and joined tens of thousands of panic-stricken refugees trying to escape to the south, bringing widespread looting and destruction in their wake. By the end of March, the NVA effectively controlled the entire northern half of South Vietnam.

Ignoring frantic pleading from South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu, the United States would not intervene, despite security guarantees given to Saigon in the January 1973 Paris Peace Accords. Even if the president wanted to provide military support, the War Powers Act, enacted in November 1973, severely restricted his ability to commit U.S. forces on his own.

The NVA, meanwhile, positioned its forces for the Ho Chi Minh Campaign, the final phase of the conquest of South Vietnam. The North Vietnamese IV Corps advanced on Xuan Loc from the northeast, while the NVA II Corps converged on the town from the northwest. The ARVN 18th Infantry Division was essentially all that stood in their way.

Earlier in the war, the 18th Infantry Division had the reputation as one of the ARVN’s worst units. That changed rapidly in March 1972, after 39-year-old Dao assumed command. Dynamic and aggressive, he was one of the best officers in the ARVN. Unlike so many other ARVN senior officers, whose careers had been built on family, social and political connections—even on bribery and corruption—Dao advanced on sheer ability. Despite the youthful good looks and large dark sunglasses that gave the impression he was just another playboy from the elite, privileged class of South Vietnamese, Dao had an inner core of steel and one of the finest tactical minds on either side of the Vietnam War.

The general eschewed a palatial villa in favor of a modest two-story house close to where his troops were billeted. During the battle, Dao spent much of his time moving among his frontline troops rather than issuing orders from a secure command post bunker. He insisted that all his officers maintain close contact with subordinates at least “two levels down.” It was an unorthodox style of leadership in an army characterized by a rigid class stratification between officers and enlisted men. Dao’s troops repaid their commander with unstinting devotion and loyalty.

Before the fight at Xuan Loc, Dao defiantly told foreign journalists: “I am determined to hold Xuan Loc. I don’t care how many divisions the communist will send against me. I will smash them all! The world shall see the strength and skill of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam.”

Dao and his commanders prepared well. First, they evacuated the soldiers’ families to the relative safety of the huge logistical base at Long Binh, close to Saigon, enabling the men to focus on the fight because their families were out of immediate harm’s way. Dao also had the foresight to establish two fully functional alternate divisional command posts. 

Refugees from Da Nang and other areas overrun by the NVA arrive by boat at Vung Tau, a port near Saigon, on April 3, 1975. (The Asahi Shimbun via Getty Images)

After studying the approach routes the communists had used to attack Xuan Loc during the 1968 Tet Offensive, Dao moved his 36 divisional field artillery pieces to positions where they could mass their fire into a triangular kill zone on the western side of the town. He placed his guns in reinforced revetments, stockpiled with ammunition, and had them adjusted for pinpoint accuracy on enemy artillery positions and all potential routes of attack. He sent infantry patrols to occupy key pieces of high ground the NVA could use as artillery observation posts.

One of the most important pieces of high ground was Nui Soc Lu, known as Ghost Mountain, astride Highway 20 and just outside the northwestern edge of Xuan Loc’s defensive perimeter.

Dao positioned two long-range 175 mm M107 self-propelled guns at Tan Phong, his first alternate command post, near the southern edge of Xaun Loc’s defensive perimeter. He had his communications and intelligence troops monitor all known NVA radio frequencies, and he studied the intercept reports daily.

In addition to the 18th Division’s own 43rd, 48th and 52nd Infantry regiments and the 181st and 182nd Field Artillery battalions, Dao’s attached forces included troops from South Vietnamese militia organizations—four Regional Force battalions and two Popular Force companies.

The NVA’s IV Corps, commanded by Maj. Gen. Do Van Cam, whose nom de guerre was Hoang Cam, moved toward Xuan Loc with its 6th, 7th and 341st Infantry divisions, supported by two armored and two artillery battalions, an anti-aircraft artillery regiment, two combat engineering regiments and a signals regiment. Cam’s forward command post was at Nui Chua Chan mountain, outside the eastern end of the Xuan Loc defensive perimeter. The NVA attackers numbered some 20,000, the ARVN defenders about 12,000.

To disrupt the NVA deployment, Dao sent a battalion-sized blocking force from the 52nd Infantry Regiment north along Highway 20 on March 28. For two days those troops held off the NVA 341st Division. By April 1, however, the South Vietnamese soldiers were pushed back to the Xuan Loc perimeter. They brought with them several prisoners of war, and interrogations revealed that many of the 341st Division POWs were barely 16 years old and largely untrained, although all were carrying modern Soviet bloc weapons.

The battle for Xuan Loc started at 5:40 a.m. on April 9 with an intense artillery barrage. The NVA gunners’ well-targeted very first shell hit Dao’s house and exploded in the bedroom. It was followed by 2,000 more rounds. At 6:40 a.m. the barrage ended, and NVA tanks and infantry moved against the town from three directions. When the shooting started, Dao was in Long Binh, where he had gone the previous day to coordinate logistical support for his division. Alerted to the attack in a phone call from his chief of staff, Dao left by helicopter for Xuan Loc. En route, he received situation reports by radio from regimental commanders.

The communists were certain Dao’s troops would break and run as soon as the artillery barrage lifted, but the ARVN soldiers held their ground. The NVA’s 7th Division carried out the main assault, attacking from the northeast without tank support. It was slowed by eight belts of barbed wire and minefields, then pummeled from the air by the South Vietnamese air force A-37B Dragonfly attack planes and F-5E Tiger fighters.

Later that morning the North Vietnamese reinforced the 7th Division with eight T-54 tanks. ARVN soldiers destroyed three of them but lost seven of their own M41 Walker Bulldog tanks. The attack from the northeast finally stalled, but not before the 7th Division overran Dao’s main command post. The general, however, had already shifted his divisional headquarters to the alternate command post at Tan Phong.

The NVA 341st Division, attacking from the northwest, entered Xuan Loc and captured an ARVN communications center, along with a local police station. But the untrained North Vietnamese teenagers could not exploit their initial gains. They were driven back by the ARVN 52nd Regimental Task Force, supported by a South Vietnamese C-119 gunship.

The 6th Division made the only significant NVA gains. Attacking from the south, its troops interdicted Highway 1 east of the Dau Giay intersection with Highway 20, cutting off Xuan Loc from Saigon. When the battle’s first day ended, the NVA had suffered about 700 dead and wounded, the ARVN 18th Division fewer than 50. 

The battle seesawed back and forth for the next two days. At 5:27 a.m. on April 10, NVA artillery opened up with a 1,000-round barrage. The NVA 7th and 341st divisions attacked in their respective sectors but were driven back repeatedly by ARVN counterattacks, sometimes in hand-to-hand fighting. The communists lost five more tanks. Dao ordered two battalions to attack two 341st Division regiments that had reached the heart of the town, and many of the teenage NVA troops broke in panic, scattering into Xuan Loc’s sewers and ruined cellars. Some captured later had not fired a single bullet from their 72-round basic load.

Meanwhile, fighter-bombers in South Vietnam’s 3rd and 5th Air divisions, operating from the Bien Hoa and Tan Son Nhut air bases on the outskirts of Saigon, flew more than 200 sorties in support of the besieged garrison. That night, North Vietnamese artillery fired 2,000 rounds into Xuan Loc, but Dao’s gunners kept up an effective counterbattery fire.

Early in the morning of April 11, NVA artillery opened fire with a 30-minute barrage. The 7th and 341st divisions then resumed their attacks, but again without success. IV Corps commander Cam, who had led a battalion of Viet Minh independence fighters against the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, later wrote: “This was the most ferocious battle I had ever been involved in! My personal assessment was that, after three days of battle, even after committing our reserves, the situation had not improved and we had suffered significant casualties.”

Cam estimated that during the battle’s first three days his 7th Division had suffered 300 casualties, and the green teens of the 341st Division 1,200. Virtually all of the NVA’s 85 mm and 75 mm artillery pieces had been knocked out by ARVN counterfire. 

South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu, here in an undated photo, had praised the defense of Xuan Loc, but just days later, on April 21, he resigned to escape the encroaching enemy. (Corbis via Getty Images)

Despite Dao’s strong defense of Xuan Loc thus far, the South Vietnamese Joint General Staff knew it had to reinforce him. The 11th Armored Brigade was committed from the west on April 11 to clear Highway 1 to the Dau Giay intersection, but the brigade’s 322nd Armored Regiment lost 11 tanks and could not dislodge the NVA.

The 1st Airborne Brigade, taking off from Bien Hoa in 100 UH-1B Huey helicopters on April 12, landed near the Bao Dinh rubber tree plantation south of Xuan Loc. CH-47 Chinook transport helicopters brought in the brigade’s supporting artillery and 93 tons of ammunition. On their return to the base, the choppers evacuated wounded 18th Division troops and local civilians in the last large-scale helicopter operation of the war.

Two marine battalions were ordered to form blocking positions between Xuan Loc and Bien Hoa, while ranger, infantry and artillery battalions provided reinforcements against an NVA attack toward Dau Giay. Meanwhile, the air force continued to pound the NVA, dropping several huge 15,000-pound BLU-82 “Daisy Cutter” bombs from C-130 Hercules cargo planes.

By the end of the fourth day, NVA dead totaled close to 2,000. Col. Gen. Tran Van Tra, the NVA officer who commanded the Viet Cong and the southern region, assumed personal control of the battle on April 13, and IV Corps was reinforced with additional troops, tanks and artillery. That same day, Dao was hit in the arm by artillery shell fragmentation. Tra shifted the NVA’s main thrust away from the center of Xuan Loc. He ordered the 6th and 341st Infantry divisions to concentrate instead on hitting Dau Giay, the linchpin of Xuan’s Loc’s defenses, from the north and the south, while establishing blocking positions to the west along Highway 1.

In Saigon, Thieu declared that Dao’s successful defense of Xuan Loc had ended the long string of communist successes and the ARVN had “recovered its fighting ability.” He spoke too soon. The NVA reinforcements included the 95B Infantry Regiment, one of North Vietnam’s elite units, which had been in the Central Highlands.

Tra quickly recognized the mistake of the original attack strategy: The NVA had not been interdicting South Vietnamese aircraft taking off from Bien Hoa. Communist gunners shifted their targets from Xuan Loc and began shelling the air base with heavy rocket and artillery fire on April 15. Almost immediately the 3rd Air Division at Bien Hoa was forced to suspend flight operations. NVA commandos infiltrated the base and blew up part of the ammo dump.

The South Vietnamese tried to shift air support operations to the 4th Air Division, flying out of Binh Thuy Air Base in the Mekong Delta, a switch that in the end didn’t matter. That same day, the NVA 6th Infantry Division and 95B Infantry Regiment captured Dau Giay. During the next two days the 6th Division beat back all ARVN attempts to retake Dau Giay. Simultaneously, the 7th and 341st Infantry divisions relentlessly hammered the defenders all around Xuan Loc, inflicting especially heavy losses on the 1st Airborne Brigade.

Xuan Loc was now cut off from reinforcement by land. Air support from Bien Hoa was drastically reduced. And the North Vietnamese II Corps was moving down from the northwest. The capture of the town was inevitable. Yet, the fierce and skillful ARVN resistance had shaken the NVA and disrupted the schedule for a final assault on Saigon. Hanoi postponed a planned April 15 attack to allow more forces to converge from the north and finally overrun Xuan Loc.

On April 17 the Senate Armed Services Committee rejected President Gerald Ford’s request for $722 million in emergency support for Saigon. On April 20, South Vietnam’s Joint General Staff ordered Dao to evacuate Xuan Loc and withdraw to Bien Hoa to establish a new center of resistance.

The withdrawal began that night under cover of heavy rainfall. In a skillfully coordinated maneuver, Dao’s troops pulled out by echelon, south through the rubber plantations, along the dirt-road Route 2. The 1st Airborne Brigade acted as the rear guard. NVA troops, taken by surprise, could do little to disrupt the withdrawal.

Unlike so many other ARVN generals who had flown out by helicopter during the 1975 communist offensive, Dao marched out on foot with his troops. In the early morning hours of April 21, the NVA scored its only success against the withdrawal when it destroyed the rearguard 3rd Battalion, 1st Airborne Brigade, near Suoi Ca hamlet. Later that day Hanoi’s troops moved into the deserted Xuan Loc, then little more than a pile of rubble.

A North Vietnamese T-54 rolls past the South Vietnamese Joint General Staff building on April 30, 1975, the day of South Vietnam’s surrender. (ADN-Bildarchiv/Ullstein Bild via Getty Images)

In Saigon, Thieu resigned as president and was replaced by Tran Van Huong. The air force, however, still had one final blow to strike. On April 22 a C-130 dropped a 750-pound CBU-55 fuel-air bomb, approaching the explosive power of a nuclear bomb, on the headquarters of the 341st Division. The bomb sucked the oxygen out of the air and killed an estimated 250 NVA soldiers in the only time a CBU-55 was used in Vietnam.   

South Vietnam’s 18th Division had suffered 30 percent casualties in defense of Xuan Loc. Its attached Regional Force and Popular Force units were virtually wiped out. The division spent three days at Bien Hoa preparing for the final defense of Saigon. On April 23 Huong promoted Dao to major general. The 18th Division was in defensive positions near the National Military Cemetery close to Bien Hoa when Saigon surrendered on April 30.

Dao wanted to keep on fighting. Dressed in civilian clothes, he made his way south into the Delta, trying to reach Can Tho, the ARVN headquarters for the IV Corps Tactical Zone. Before he got there, however, the corps commander, Maj. Gen. Nguyen Khoa Nam, and his deputy, Gen. Le Van Hung, committed suicide. Dao surrendered on May 9 and spent the next 17 years in brutally repressive “re-education camps.” In May 1992 he was one of the last four senior ARVN officers freed. Dao arrived in the United States in April 1993. 

Throughout the war Americans asked themselves how the North Vietnamese could fight so well and the South Vietnamese could not. The Battle of Xuan Loc indisputably proved the ARVN could fight. The key was leadership. The ARVN’s great weakness was that it never had enough generals like Dao, who at Xuan Loc went head-to-head with far more experienced NVA generals, Do Van Cam and Tran Van Tra. Le Minh Dao was the Leonidas at South Vietnam’s Thermopylae.

Retired Army Maj. Gen. David T. Zabecki is editor emeritus of Vietnam magazine.

 This feature originally appeared in the April 2020 issue of Vietnam magazine.