Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Thursday, August 13, 2026

Buy Guns and lots of ammo

 

I am concerned for 2 reasons, for the unholy alliance between the islamist and the socialist, they both hate the west and the United States.  My fear is that there will be enough idiots that will fall for the promise of "Free shit" and they will vote in their destruction.  Once you go commie, you can't vote for a "redo", you have to shoot your way out.

       And the 2nd thing is the islamist, they are following the same playbook they did in Beirut and Lebanon, Beirut in the 50's and the 60's was called the "Paris of the Middle East" before the islamist came, used the levers of government against the people and fomented a civil war.  The same islamist that got kicked out of Jordan and Syria for destabilizing their governments, and they got the boot so they settled in southern Lebanon and got "their candidates elected and started pushing their own agenda.  Kinda what I am seeing Dearbornistan and in certain parts of Texas.

     I shamelessly clipped this from "Townhall" in the opinion section.


Buy Guns and Lots of Ammo
AP Photo/Charles Krupa

There is only one way that the story can end.

One of our frequent activities when visiting my folks in Vegas was to get to a gun range. And while we enjoyed many of the private ones in the area, our favorite was the Clark County Shooting Complex. We found the staff there very professional, super safety-conscious, and very patient with people, as Rambo described himself, who have fired a few shots. Every trip involved at least one visit to the shooting range. My kids were shocked when they saw rifles at Walmart and when we did our bullet shopping there when ammo was cheaper than at the gun range.

Advertisement

People should use their constitutional right to own guns and ammo. They should be proficient in the use of their guns, and they should obviously take great care to keep all weapons safely stored. Why should Americans get more guns if they already have nearly 400 million today? Because there is only one way that this story is going to end.

Oftentimes we can see a disaster a mile off. You have a friend with a very abusive boyfriend. They don’t break up immediately, but when your friend says that they parted ways after six months, it is no great surprise to you. Sometimes we see a guy driving like a lunatic and are not shocked to see his vehicle doing an accordion impression somewhere further down the interstate. Every form of government includes the seeds of its own destruction. The same is true for dictatorships and democracies. We have witnessed in our lifetimes the end of the USSR and the fall of strongmen like Saddam and Assad. Repression and violence against citizens may work for many long years, but the resentment grows, and at some point, a dictator might either find the end of a noose or a one-way ticket out of his country. The same problem exists with Western democracies.

One has to always recall that Adolf Hitler came to power through elections. He was tasked by Germany’s president to form a government after his Nazi Party had the strongest showing in the 1933 vote. Once he took power, he ended all other parties and became the de facto dictator of Germany and later much of Europe. It took a horrific war and tens of millions dead before Hitler killed himself in his bunker. Germany and the world were devastated but better off with his end.

Now let’s look at the modern West, including the U.S. Since Western countries refuse to follow the example of the Saudis or Emiratis and ban the Muslim Brotherhood, the future is already written on the wall. Governments will not find the will or legal basis to deny entry to untold numbers of Muslim pseudo-asylum seekers. Boats keep coming to Europe and the locals take in the non-assimilating foreigners instead of sinking the dinghies or turning them back. Whereas a religious Christian or Jew looks to practice his faith without governmental interference, many Muslims who come to the West see spreading Sharia to their new countries as an integral part of their Islamic faith. Whereas Jews might build a new Synagogue or Christians might set up a new university, Muslims will look at how to get political power to end the government and freedoms we take for granted. And there is no political will or simple legal way to stop this process. Let’s imagine that the U.S. stops all immigration from Muslim countries, something that Donald Trump proposed in 2016 and was labeled a racist for even suggesting. And let’s go further and imagine that the U.S. ejects every Muslim foreigner who has overstayed his visa or otherwise violated U.S. law. Well, that would be quite a start. But what about Dearborn? Or what about new Muslim cities springing up in places like Texas? If Muslims simply wanted to live their religious lives without any goals of taking over and making Sharia the law of the land, I would wish them well. But as we see on a daily basis, many Muslims in the U.S. and Europe are by no means shy about stating that their goal is to plant the flag of Sharia where the Stars and Stripes or Union Jack has stood until this day.

Advertisement

Just as Hitler and his comrades knew how to game the system to reach the top and then pull up the ladder, Muslims in Western lands with Qatari and Muslim Brotherhood funding and support wish to gain political power so as to make Sharia law inevitable. Why was an Indian fellow arrested for refusing to sell Halal food in his British restaurant? Why is the current Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate from Michigan campaigning with a fellow who said that the U.S. deserved 9/11? Just as Bin Laden and his terrorists used U.S. flight schools and lax security in airports and on planes in order to pull off their mass murder of American citizens, Muslim Brotherhood-funded organizations take advantage of university and other systems to push forward their goals of making Islam appealing and not so scary — you know, with its stonings and throwing gays off of tall buildings. Qatar has pumped billions of dollars into K-12 and universities for the express purpose of making Sharia inevitable in the U.S. via the education of its future leaders. One already sees people screaming at some random Jews that they are baby killers and genocidal, though the attacked are not Israelis and have absolutely no connection to Bibi Netanyahu, the state of Israel, or the IDF. The brainwashing is working, with all Jews now being called evil murderers. Churches in the West are going up in smoke, with arson implicated in many cases. Why would that be?

So, there would appear to be no political will or simple legal arrangement to stop Muslim arrivals or effect enough Muslim assimilation to prevent the march of Sharia. And that’s where the guns and ammo come in. I don’t know if it will be in a decade or two, but there will come a time when a Muslim leader, backed by a Muslim city council or state legislature, will try to make Sharia replace the laws of the land as we have understood them for 250 years. And while most people considered the threat of an overbearing government coming from leftists yearning to be Stalins and Maos, leftists don’t reproduce. The threat to We the People and One Nation Under God will come from the growing Muslim population with its focus not on living religious lives in a pluralistic United States but rather gaining enough power to impose Sharia law on everybody, Muslims and everyone else. And that’s when people will react. That’s when they will realize that their future will not be the same as their past. Non-Muslims will become second-class citizens, but they will be armed citizens. The state, as in Weimar Germany, does not have the tools to stop the march of a totalitarian movement parading as being just like everybody else. And that’s where the armed and trained citizen will come in. It’s a lousy prediction, but governments are feckless while the Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar are not.

When Americans travel overseas or even go to live there, we do not try to impose our ways on the locals. I was once asked to speak at an anti-government rally (as a terror victim), and I refused because I did not believe that it was the right of an American citizen to get up and criticize the local Israeli government. Muslims in Europe are clear that they don’t want alcohol, dogs, or improperly dressed women in their areas. Those areas will grow to country-sized swaths of the map. May it never happen in the U.S.

Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.




           This one is from my "Stash"

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

"The 9.pm Security Routine"

 

One of the things that I do is that I have double cylinder locks on my doors in my house and the key is hanging near the door, because I have glass by the handle, I don't want anybody busting the glass and turning the interior lock and opening the door.  I also have lights all over the place. along with camera's watching the entrances to the house and garage.  Nothing is foolproof, just making it more difficult to get in.



In The Safety Trap by security expert Spencer Coursen, he describes a case where a wealthy client of his kept the key fobs for his luxury vehicles near the front door. A thief was able to quietly enter this man’s home, grab a fob, and drive off with a car. 

The owner was in his bedroom the whole time, oblivious to the fact that he was getting robbed right underneath his nose. 

This rich guy called Spencer for a consult on installing a sophisticated security system to avoid another brazen theft. 

“Was the front door locked?” Spencer initially inquired regarding the theft. 

“Well, no . . .” responded the client.

“Why not try locking your doors first before we spend a lot of money on a security system?” Spencer asked.

While this “Well duh!”-inducing story probably makes you think “I’d never be so dumb,” chances are, you are sometimes that dumb. Dimes to donuts, you do sometimes leave your doors unlocked, even when you’re sleeping.

That’s because you haven’t routinized the locking of your doors. You just do it willy-nilly, making yourself re-remember to do it each night. And sometimes your memory fails you.

Spencer says that a surprising number of burglaries occur because the homeowner left a door or window unlocked. It’s a small mistake, but it can be a costly one.

Burglars are criminals of opportunity. The easier it will be to burglarize your home without getting caught, the more likely they are to commit the crime. If you make burgling your house a bit more difficult, you reduce the likelihood of your house getting hit.

There are lots of ways to make your home a less desirable target for criminals, including these 8 low-tech methods.  

But according to Spencer, one of the easiest, most bang-for-your-buck things you can do to improve your home security is simply performing a set security check before you turn in for the night. He calls this the “9 p.m. routine,” though you can do it at whatever time works for you. The important thing is to simply be consistent. 

It only takes five minutes and requires doing the following things: 

  • Make sure all home doors are shut and locked.
  • Make sure all home windows are shut and locked.
  • Draw the blinds.
  • Ensure outside lights are on (to make this easier, install a solar timetable light switch).
  • If you park a car outside, double-check that the vehicle is locked and valuables are removed. (I’m always surprised by the number of people on my Nextdoor feed complaining that a gun was stolen from the glove compartment of their car. When asked if the car was locked, the answer is often no.)
  • If you have a home security system, enable it.

Many of you are already doing your version of the 9 p.m. routine. Consider this some friendly encouragement to keep it up.

But as Spencer noted, many people don’t do something as basic as locking their doors and shutting their windows. If this is you, take this as your nudge to start your own nightly security check.

Your home is your sanctuary. Develop this simple habit that can keep it that way. 

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

"When Everything is Fascism, nothing is"

 Y'all notice our friends on the left side of the aisle, they call everything the GOp does as either "NAZI" or "Fascism", not knowing the real meaning of the world except what their college professors told them.


   SO we deal with know it all people like this that have no real knowledge except "book knowledge" and what they regurgitated from their leftist professors.   it does get old.    


    I without shame clipped this from Michael Smith(Again)




If I hear that America is sliding into fascism one more time, I’m going to puke.
Maybe I’m just hopelessly old-fashioned, but I still believe words are supposed to mean things. Fascism is a real thing. It has a history, an ideology, identifiable characteristics and some exceptionally ugly examples from the twentieth century. It does not simply mean that the president said something obnoxious, enforced a law you dislike, criticized a newspaper, deported someone, imposed a tariff, fired a bureaucrat or exercised an executive power differently than the last guy did.
Yet here we are.
“Fascism” has become less a political classification than a particularly nasty synonym for “authoritarian,” and authoritarian increasingly means “someone on the other political team using government power in a way I don’t like.”
When everything is fascism, nothing is.
That is not an argument that fascism is meaningless. Quite the opposite. It is an argument that a useful word has been abused to the point that its use in contemporary American politics often tells us more about the person saying it than the person being described.
The accusation against Donald Trump is particularly revealing because so much of the case rests not upon an objective description of a political system but upon interpretations of what Trump says and predictions about what he might eventually do. He attacks judges and newspapers. He calls people enemies. He talks incessantly about America and American interests. He wants immigration laws aggressively enforced. He pushes presidential authority as far as he thinks the law permits, just like his predecessors did.
From this collection of facts comes a remarkable progression of reasoning. Trump says things associated in someone’s mind with authoritarian leaders. Therefore Trump thinks like an authoritarian and he intends to become an authoritarian. So, America is becoming authoritarian. Somewhere along the way, “authoritarian” becomes “fascist,” and suddenly Mussolini is lurking behind the Resolute desk.
That is a lot of inference masquerading as evidence.
It becomes even more problematic when we remember that executive aggression did not begin on January 20, 2017. Barack Obama famously said he had a “pen and a phone” when Congress would not give him what he wanted. His administration used executive discretion to reshape immigration enforcement. Joe Biden attempted enormously consequential policy changes through executive authority, including student loan cancellation, only to have the Supreme Court tell him he lacked the authority he claimed. Both administrations were accused of weaponizing federal institutions against political opponents, fairly in some cases and unfairly in others.
Trump himself was investigated, surveilled, impeached twice, prosecuted by federal and state authorities, removed from a state presidential ballot until the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the decision, and subjected to legal theories that his supporters understandably regarded as politically motivated.
None of that proves Obama or Biden was a fascist. It proves something much less exciting and much more important: the American presidency has accumulated enormous power, and Americans have developed an astonishing ability to discover the dangers of executive authority approximately five minutes after the other party takes control of it.
If authoritarianism is what actually concerns us, perhaps we should stop looking for black shirts and start measuring something we can measure. Here’s an idea, how about we pay attention to what people say they are going to do and objectively judge what they have done? Sound good? That test produces a rather different picture from the one presented in most discussions of “fascism.”
Consider the Democratic Socialists of America.
There is no need to decipher secret hand signals, analyze dog whistles, read smoke signals, or hire a panel of cable-news psychologists to tell us what DSA members secretly believe. They have a website. They publish a program. They do interviews on FOX News.
The DSA openly advocates replacing capitalism with socialism and transferring substantial economic power from private ownership to collective control. Its political program calls for abolishing the United States Senate and Electoral College, replacing the presidency with an executive chosen by and subordinate to Congress, replacing the Supreme Court with a judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress, and bringing major corporations and important industries under public ownership.
I am not claiming that makes every DSA member a Stalinist or that the organization proposes loading political opponents onto trains. It explicitly describes its project as democratic socialism and rejects authoritarian socialism. Some of its proposed constitutional changes could even be accomplished legally through the amendment process.
But that misses the point.
I do not have to speculate about whether DSA wants to fundamentally remake the American constitutional order. They tell me they do and they have the Democrat Party by the short and curlies.
That is an important difference.
The Constitution is deliberately frustrating. That is one of its greatest virtues. It divides power precisely because the Founders understood something about human beings that utopians perpetually forget: people do not become wiser, kinder or less self-interested when handed political authority.
The Senate frustrates majorities. The Electoral College frustrates national majorities. The presidency frustrates Congress. Congress frustrates presidents. Courts frustrate both. States frustrate Washington. Individual rights frustrate everybody.
It is supposed to work that way, inefficiency is a feature, not a bug. It gives the nation time to take a breath before taking a leap.
Our constitutional system begins with distrust of concentrated power. Socialist political philosophy begins from a very different premise because achieving collective economic outcomes necessarily requires somebody to possess sufficient authority to produce those outcomes. You cannot collectively control resources, production and distribution without a mechanism capable of telling individuals what they may own, produce, sell, buy or retain.
That doesn’t automatically produce Stalin. It does create a question that deserves considerably more attention than whether Donald Trump used an adjective reminiscent of Mussolini.
Who controls the controllers?
This is why I find our national obsession with fascism increasingly unserious. We have turned political analysis into a game of psychological interpretation. Trump’s words are examined for evidence of what he secretly intends to do tomorrow while explicit proposals to dismantle or subordinate institutions limiting political power are treated as ordinary policy disagreements because the people proposing them use the word “democratic” before “socialist.”
Maybe we should reverse the process.
Stop telling me:
- What you think politicians secretly believe. Tell me what powers they claim and why that is different from prior presidents.
- Somebody “sounds authoritarian.” Show me what restraints on governmental power he wants removed.
- What Trump might someday do and apply the same scrutiny to what every political movement openly says it intends to do.
And for heaven’s sake, stop calling everything fascism.
There are perfectly adequate words for unconstitutional, abusive, illiberal, authoritarian, dishonest, corrupt, stupid and dangerous. They don’t all mean the same thing, which is precisely why we have different words for them.
The Constitution also gives us a remarkably simple test that requires none of these ideological labels. Just ask who has the power, where did it originate, what are its limits, and what happens if it is abused?
Those simple questions don’t care whether the president is Donald Trump, Joe Biden or Barack Obama. They don’t care whether the politician calls himself a Republican, Democrat, democratic socialist or something else entirely. They require neither mind-reading nor historical cosplay.
The questions require evidence and if the evidence someday demonstrates that the American right is attempting to dismantle constitutional government, I’ll call it what the evidence supports. If the evidence demonstrates that the American left is doing it, the standard cannot suddenly change because its intentions are supposedly benevolent.
That is the whole point of constitutional government.

Monday, August 10, 2026

Monday Music "Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood" by Santa Esmerelda

    I was driving to work early Monday morning a couple of weeks ago and I happen to stop on the "Studio 54" channel of Sirius/XM, it plays a lot of dance and Disco, hence the channel location of "54" like the famous "Studio 54" in New York during the Heydays of Disco, well anyway I heard this sone and I stopped and listened to it because I heard it before somewhere and it took a couple of minutes to figure it out.   


                                                               Fixed it


  YES!    I heard it during the fight scene between Uma Thurmond and Luci Liu.  I always liked the Kill Bill Vol1 because of the Revenge and Payback angle in the movie.  Fun fact, the Yellow Tracksuit Uma Worn is in homage to Bruce Lee Track Suit in "Game Of Death

    


The Animals did a version in the 1960's and I actually heard it on my "60's Gold" channel on my Sirius/XM a week later, Funny That.

The Animals' lead singer Eric Burdon would later say of the song, "It was never considered pop material, but it somehow got passed on to us and we fell in love with it immediately."

The song was recorded in November 1964. The band became a trans-Atlantic hit in early 1965 for their rendition of the song, rising to No. 3 on the UK Singles Chart, No. 15 on the U.S. pop singles chart, and No. 4 in Canada.

Cash Box described it as "a striking combination of R&B and English-rock touches." This single was ranked by Rolling Stone at No. 322 on their list of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time.

During Animals concerts at the time, the group maintained the recorded arrangement, but Burdon sometimes slowed the vocal line down to an almost spoken part, recapturing a bit of the Simone flavor.

At the South by Southwest festival in 2012, Bruce Springsteen credited the song as the inspiration and the riff for his 1978 song "Badlands".

       Now This is the version I heard on Channel 54


A disco version of the song by the group Santa Esmeralda, which took the Animals' arrangement and transformed it with disco, flamenco, and other Latin rhythm and ornamentation elements, also became a hit in the late 1970s. Their version of the song was first released in summer 1977 as a 16-minute epic that took up an entire side of their Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood album, which was picked up for greater worldwide distribution by their label at the time, Casablanca Records. The 12-inch club remix was extremely popular, reached No. 1 on the U.S. Billboard Club Play Singles chart and in some European countries as well. Though, the single peaked at No. 4 on the Hot Dance/Disco-Club Play chart. Their 7-inch single version peaked at #15 on the Billboard Hot 100 in the U.S., which is coincidentally the same number at which The Animals version peaked.

Instrumental sections of this version were used in the pilot for the US game show Bullseye, live telecasts of the PBA Tour on USA Network from 1982 to 1984, and in the 2003 Quentin Tarantino film Kill Bill: Volume I, in the background during the final duel between The Bride (Uma Thurman) and O-Ren Ishii (Lucy Liu).

Saturday, August 8, 2026

"Democrats want to close the prisons.....except for people like you"

 


I shamelessly clipped this from Townhall.com , I "bolded the last paragraph because it is very important.   This was supposed to go up yesterday, but work got in the way....


Democrats Want to Close the Prisons, Except Not for People Like You
JANIFEST/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The current trend of Democratic Socialists of America goobers going on Fox and proudly coming out for all the weird and stupid things they support is akin to the phenomenon of a few years ago where you had furries publicly and proudly proclaiming their bizarre identity, except the people pretending to be cartoon foxes and wombats were less embarrassing. As dumb and creepy as it is to dress up as an anime marsupial and admit that their furry fetish tops “sincere people” and “long walks on the beach” on their list of turn-ons, at least the furry strange-os didn’t murder 100 million people over the last century. Of course, it’s probably only because their costumes don’t provide opposable thumbs to hold the guns.


It’s both amusing and horrifying to watch these DSA out n’ proud people in action. It’s pretty clear they never got the memo: you’re supposed to hide the most insane parts of your agenda so normal people can be suckered in. It’s like being inside a Trojan horse, which probably has a slightly different meaning to these perverts; you want to come across as someone vaguely relatable and then only reveal your true self when you come to power. But it’s hard for them to resist the limelight. They’ve never been in the limelight before. Look at these goofs. They are a hapless collection of weirdos, losers, and mutations, the kind of people who, in a civilized society, would’ve been bullied in middle school and high school into something near normality. Along the way, our society made the mistake of celebrating freaks, and now we’re overrun by them. Worse, in some places, we’re going to be run by them.

And that’s a problem. Socialism is bad. It’s strange that you have to say it, but people seem to forget most of the 20th century when socialism, the fantasy ideology of the evil, the envious, and the cruel, was both put into practice and thoroughly repudiated. The heaps of the dead are testimony to its inevitable result. They try to get around the truth of history by claiming that true communism has never been tried—yeah, I know there is supposed to be a difference between socialism and communism, but that’s like the difference between syphilis and AIDS; one is an inevitable gateway infection for the other, and you certainly don’t want either. But based on the world’s experience with this political pathology, true communism probably means 200 million dead. Maybe even more

Some people who, for whatever reason, cannot accept the fact that other

 people are just plain evil will try to whitewash Marxism by arguing that

 it’s merely bad policy. See, it doesn’t work, they tell you, as if that’s the

 reason you don’t want to put it into practice. But it’s an inhuman and

 anti-God ideology that twists and perverts human nature to elevate lies

 and murder over truth and justice. As these creeps demonstrate,

 socialism is simply a means for losers to take from productive people

 what they’re too lazy and stupid to generate on their own. That’s why

 you never see one of these Marxists looking forward to the revolution

 where they get to be the guy digging the sewer line or manning a

 garbage truck; no, after the revolution, the cadres are going to be the

 ones composing genderfluid poetry or doing interpretive dances in their

 gardens, conveniently forgetting that the gardens wouldn’t be theirs,

 nor would anything else.

No, the evil of socialism is not a bug, but rather a feature. Remember, it’s

 driven by hate—hate of the normal, hate of the smarter, hate of the

 better, hate of your parents who just didn’t get you. And every single

 time it’s put into practice, we see the same thing. Since everything in

 socialism goes against human nature, you need an apparatus of

 repression designed to force people to accept what nature rejects.

 There’s not a socialist country without thuggish police. There’s not a

 socialist country where you can speak freely. There’s not a socialist

 country where you are free because your freedom defeats the whole

 purpose of socialism, which is ensuring your submission to the cadres.


We could go through all their policy prescriptions, from open borders to

 amnesty to free everything for everybody, thanks to the people like you

 who have to work to generate this bounty while the cadres are busy

 playing their lutes. Socialism is not about making lives better or creating

 prosperity or security or any of those things. It’s about jerks living out

 their personal psychodramas while they get off on making you

 miserable.

Nothing demonstrates that more than the idea of defunding the police

 and getting rid of prisons. After all, you wicked normal people deserve

 to have thugs, junkies, murderers, rapists, and other Democrat

 constituencies turned on you to make you pay for the crime of being

 you. You need to understand the deep hate that lives within all these

 people, and that’s why, in every single leftist sector of society, you see

 the actual criminals not merely being ignored but being idolized. The

 DSA types would free these barbarians for the express purpose of

 allowing those barbarians to hurt you, because you deserve to be hurt.

 You deserve to be killed. You deserve to be raped. Why? Because these

 freaks don’t like you and it amuses them to see you in pain.

But there’s a practical side to it too. The old Soviet Union understood it.

 Regular criminals were victims of society, and you, being the foundation

 of society, need to be victimized in return. If you were a regular

 criminal, you were treated infinitely better than someone who

 committed a real crime, that is, a political crime. If you opposed the

 regime, then you were a real criminal.


So all this stuff about closing the prisons is just nonsense. Same with

 defunding the police. The DSA types have no intention of ending prisons

 or ending the police. They just intend to change the target demographic

 from actual criminals to people like you who stand up and demand your

 rights. In the socialist paradigm, the only real crime is opposing the

 socialists. And they would not hesitate to lock you up or murder you if

 you get in their way.

Now, some people point to the social contract by which we give up our

 natural right to seek justice from those who wrong us in favor of the

 procedures we set up through our democratic government. This allows

 prosecution and punishment to be taken away from what are sometimes

 called vigilantes and given to our properly constituted government. And

 these folks critique the DSA prison-closing/police-defunding agenda by

 pointing out that we could just become vigilantes and do the justice

 dispensing ourselves. But of course, that would never happen, because

 the socialists would see vigilantism as an actual crime. Exercising power

 outside of the socialist structure is unforgivable. Oh, you can rape and

 molest and murder to your heart’s content, but cut into the party’s

 action? That’s when the gloves come off. That’s when the underfunded

 secret police are set upon you and haul you off to the unclosed gulag

 with the other uppity kulaks.



Socialism isn’t a bunch of 1960s ethnically homogeneous Swedes paying

 55 percent in taxes to live moderately comfortably in clean and safe

 Stockholm. It’s Los Angeles in 2026 where a hobo is crapping on your

 lawn. It’s London in 2026 where you get arrested for tweeting

 unapproved things. It’s Spain in 2026, where a zillion Third World

 barbarians without shirts jump the border and run past cheering 20-

something lefty girls in a grand de-reconquista.

We’ve actually been spoiled when it comes to defeating socialism. In the

 1980s, Ronald Reagan smashed the big socialist enchilada without firing

 a shot. The USSR collapsed under its own weight, but that was in large

 part because there was a counterexample, the glorious United States of

 the ’80s, a beacon to the rest of the world demonstrating that there was

 something better. But now, the socialists are hitting everything at once.

 They don’t want a counterexample hanging around out there. They don’t

 want people to know that there’s an alternative and to be able to

 peacefully undo their color revolution. We were spoiled, because we

 defeated socialism without much bloodshed in the big scheme of things.

But this time, we may not get off so easily. Socialists don’t always just

 give up. Chile overthrew the communists by throwing a bunch of them

 out of helicopters. The Spanish Nationalists defeated a communist-run

 revolution through years of fighting. Once the DSA-types get power, do

 you think they’ll just give it up if we ask nicely? Understand what kind of

 America these DSA types want. Understand that they will use the

 engines of government, including the courts and law enforcement,

 against you. Understand that there will still be crimes; it’s just those

 crimes will be saying what you think, praying how you want, and owning guns.


The last part is key. The last part is your backstop against perpetual

 tyranny. The last part is why they want you disarmed. So, buy guns and

 ammunition, because once the suckers and saps vote us into socialism,

 there is no voting our way back out of it.