Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Saturday, January 18, 2025

President Trump Official Inaugeration Portraits have been unveiled.

Sorry for not posting sooner, have been busy in "Meatspace"  as they say.



I shamelessly snagged this from "Red State", while working....I can see the liberals heads exploding over this.


AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Trump-Vance Transition Team just released the official inauguration portraits of Donald Trump and JD Vance. They're sure to send leftists already dreading Trump's return to the White House scurrying for a change of pants.

Advertisement

Well, one portrait will, anyway.

"In just four days, Donald J. Trump will be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States and JD Vance as the 50th Vice President of the United States — and their official portraits are here," the team said in a statement.

And man, if you needed evidence that 47 isn't messing around, this is it. This portrait is as based as you'll ever see.

Just look at that thing. Trump should coin the look "red steel."

We have to give Vance his due as well. Considering we're transitioning away from a yellow bus, Venn diagram, coconut tree-obsessed master of the word salad, it's nice to see an actual adult heading to the role of Veep.

Vance, much as he is viewed in the grander scheme of things, comes off in his official portrait as slightly less rough around the edges. Can't wait to see what his presidential portrait looks like in 2028.

Now, we'd be remiss if we didn't mention that Trump's official portrait bears an uncanny resemblance to the pose in his infamous mugshot a little over a year ago.

Advertisement

What's impressive is that, at the time of the mugshot, Democrats genuinely thought they had the man down. He was going to prison, and there was no longer any fear of Trump in the White House.

Here we are less than 18 months later, and Trump has the same look on his face. Only this time, it's others who should be fretting about prison time while Democrats wonder if they'll ever hold the White House again.


Amazing: Speed Painter at Rally Whips Up Trump Portrait in 180 Seconds—but His Message Is Even Better


That mugshot, by the way, is one of two photos that ultimately helped define Trump's resilience and propel him to a second term. The other, of course, being the image of him standing up and shouting "Fight!" after the Butler, Pennsylvania, assassination attempt in July.

It's incredible the difference in vibes coming from Trump's official inauguration portrait compared to the famous official painting of Obama sitting in a chair, arms crossed, in front of hedges for some unknown reason.

It's almost certain that if you showed Trump's portrait to the Obama portrait, Barack and his little chair would start fading back into the bushes, Homer Simpson-style.

Advertisement

The newly released portrait of Trump goes hard. No doubt about it. It's right on par with another portrait by artist Scott LoBaido.

LoBaido generated a speed painting at the Madison Square Garden rally weeks before the election that had the crowd astonished. Watch it to the end. You won't regret it.

The serious demeanor captured in the newest official portrait reflects Trump's readiness to tackle the challenges of his second term. It's going to be no easy task trying to fix everything that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris broke over the past four years.

But the look on his face indicates he's ready to roll up his sleeves and Make America Great Again.

Sunday, January 5, 2025

President Carter's bungling made the United States look like a "Paper Tiger "

 

I was in High school in Alabama when the Hostages were seized in 1979 and how impotent the United States appeared to be.  We as a nation was humiliated by the seizure of the Embassy  against all international Law.  We were further humiliated when "Desert One" happened, it showed how poor shape the United States Armed forces were in after Vietnam and the resulting "Hollow Army" as it was called.  I remembered the shame we felt as a nation when the hostage rescue failed from a myriad of reasons and plain bad luck, Murphy ran amuck with the planning and execution of the mission.  I remembered President Jimmy Carter on national TV apologizing for the failure of the mission. 
I had a lot of bad things to say about President Jimmy Carter, but he took full responsibility for the debacle which shows good character.  After this Jimmy Carter asked congress to massively increase the Military budget.  After the 1980 elections when President Ronald Reagan pushed for even a bigger increase in the budget because of the poor state of the U.S Armed Forces.  Back in 1980 I as a kid supported Jimmy Carter because he was from my State of Georgia.  Jimmy Carter was a good man but a poor president and his economic policies were a disaster. When 1984 rolled around, I was 18 years old, just turned 18, and voted for "President Reagan" in the 1984 Elections.

I shamelessly clipped it from "The Federalist"

Kevin Hermening was a 20-year-old sergeant with the Marine Security Guard protecting the U.S. Embassy in Tehran when all hell broke loose. On Nov. 4, 1979, Iranian students serving the Islamic Revolution stormed the compound and held more than 50 American citizens — including Hermening — hostage. 

“We had 12-gauge shotgun and .38 caliber revolvers, and that was it,” Hermening told me this week during an interview on the “Vicki McKenna Show.” “We were way outnumbered.” The U.S. acting ambassador and the attaches gave the orders to the Marine security forces to lay down their weapons, the Wausau, Wisconsin, financial services professional said.  

“There was nothing that was going to be done to shoot our way out of it,” Hermening recalled of the chaotic day, now 45 years in the world’s rearview mirror but still so present in U.S. foreign affairs. 

The Marine and 51 others would spend the next 444 days as hostages of an unholy war that made the world’s greatest superpower look like a chump on the world stage (The revolutionaries released 13 hostages in the opening weeks of the Iran Hostage Crisis, including all of the women taken as well as the black captives — billed as “oppressed minorities” by the Iranian oppressors).

As fond to fawning remembrances of James Earl Carter flow from the pages of the corporate press following Sunday’s passing of the 39th president, many of the glowing obituaries are leaving out or glossing over some critical details. While Jimmy Carter in many ways may have been a good man, he was an absolutely lousy president.

Hermening, 444 days a hostage, has a decidedly different take on the former president than the sanguine scribes in the accomplice media. He remembers an incompetent commander-in-chief, the leader of the free world who led with his heart instead of his head. And the world, Hermening said, has suffered much because of it ever since. 

‘A Gun to Their Heads’

It was cool and drizzly on the day the embassy fell, Hermening told Disabled American Veterans in a post published on Nov. 1, 2023. He said he had been at the embassy working on plans for the upcoming Marine Corps birthday ball. 

A riot was brewing outside. 

“Looking out onto the front grounds, I saw hundreds of Iranians already gathering and thousands more smashing through and eventually opening the front gate,” he told DAV.org. 

The hostages were routinely terrorized by the Islamic revolutionaries. Iranian jihadists had months before ousted the West-backed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, who had fled in January that year. The leadership gap was filled by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the exiled Shi’a religious leader who had returned from Paris to lead the terror-steeped Islamist revolution fueled by deep-seated hatred for the United States —  and the West in general.

The American Embassy hostages were often awakened in the night with a gun to their heads. Their captors would pull the trigger of the unloaded weapons in mock executions, the DAV.org post recalled. 

“Army Col. Charles Scott, chief of the Defense Liaison Office at the embassy, was beaten severely during an interrogation, and three of his teeth were broken off at the gum line — injuries that went untreated until after they were released,” the publication noted. 

‘Warned for Months’

Over the past 45 years, Hermening has often pondered the failures of the Carter administration and the weak president behind the foreign policy disaster. 

“The problem is that back in Washington, D.C., the reports being given to the president of the United States were severely flawed, because the State Department officials in Tehran were giving the information of how unstable it was,” Hermening told me in the radio interview.  

The White House disregarded the intelligence from the ground. Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to receive medical care in the United States despite now-declassified documents out of Tehran warning that the embassy would be seized and the Americans inside would be taken captive if the Carter administration allowed the Shah refuge in the United States. 

“Iran experts inside the State Department had warned for months that to do so would create huge problems for U.S. policy and even endanger diplomats in Iran but Carter’s senior advisers one-by-one lined up in favor of admitting the Shah,” a retrospective on the hostage crisis from the National Security Archive at George Washington University states. The shah, after all, was an old pal and a very well-paid ally in the Cold War against communism. 

More incredulously, Hermening said, was that the “delusional Department of State” about a week before the seizure of the embassy was authorizing family members of diplomats and senior military officers to come to Tehran. 

‘Wrong-Headed Approach’

As the weeks dragged into months, Carter’s Pentagon planned a rescue mission. The botched operation, launched on April 24, 1980, ended with the deaths of eight U.S. service members and not a single hostage rescued. It arguably was one of the more impotent moments in U.S. military history, undertaken by a notoriously weak administration. 

Hermening and his fellow hostages would be held by their terrorist captors for another nine months. They were finally released on Jan. 20, 1981, the day Carter’s successor, Ronald Reagan, was sworn into office. 

“As he and Reagan sat uncomfortably with one another in a limousine on the way to Reagan’s inauguration, Carter got a call from National Security Agency Director Bobby Ray Inman telling him that the hostages would not be allowed to leave Iran until after Reagan was sworn in,” presidential historian Tevi Troy recently wrote in a column for City Journal. “The Iranians would not give Carter even the small victory of seeing the hostages released on his watch.”

Some insist the hostages are alive because Carter placed their lives above America’s image in a Cold War world. Hermening said that’s conjecture at best. One thing he said he’s sure of all these years later is that the Democrat’s weakness has cost the United States dearly. 

“…[Y]es, of course, I’m glad I’m here. I’m glad I’m alive. I’m glad we returned home, save the eight heroes who perished [in Operation Eagle Claw] during the aborted rescue mission in April of 1980,” the former hostage said. “But President Carter put the interests of 50 people ahead of the interests of the entire country, and that is the wrong-headed approach.” 

“I understand the humanitarian side of that, but it’s not great leadership because we have been seen as a "Paper Tiger" by the most radicalized elements of the Middle East and their followers across the globe now for 45 years. And it started with President Jimmy Carter’s failed leadership in Washington,” Hermening continued. 

A Legacy of Foreign Policy Fecklessness

As Troy noted in his remembrance of Carter, one of the 39th president’s primary weaknesses was that “he had a hard time distinguishing between friends and enemies.” 

“Perhaps this fault explains why, after he left the White House, Carter gained a reputation as an ex-president for coddling dictators, whether in Haiti, Syria, or North Korea,” the historian wrote. 

The Iran hostage crisis emboldened despots around the world, particularly the communists. Soviet Union-backed Marxists seized power in Africa and Asia as the U.S. weakly watched. Reagan would ultimately win the Cold War and bring back respect for the lone-standing world power through strength, but the worldview damage from the Carter years lives on. 

The Algiers Accords, brokered with and without the Carter administration, freed the hostages, but they also pushed the U.S. to stay out of Iran’s business — even when Iran has rattled its sabers at what it has vilified as “the Great Satan.” And the U.S. signed off on a special tribunal to resolve disputes over frozen Iranian assets.  One of the big payouts arrived in the final year of the second term of President Barack Obama, whose naive foreign policy was often drawn from the book of Carter. Remember the pallets of cash, including the $400 million ransom for the release of American prisoners, Obama’s team secretly airlifted to Tehran?  

The Wall Street Journal reported in August 2016:

Revolutionary Guard commanders boasted at the time that the Americans had succumbed to Iranian pressure. “Taking this much money back was in return for the release of the American spies,” said Gen. Mohammad Reza Naghdi, commander of the Guard’s Basij militia, on state media.

Biden’s Hero

Hermening said he finds it interesting that Carter, who died Sunday at 100, lived long enough to see his legacy as the “worst president our country ever had” eclipsed by the presidency of the soon-to-be departing President Joe Biden. The 46th president’s Iran Hostage Crisis moment came in the first year of his presidency amid the catastrophic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, in which 13 U.S. service members were murdered in a terrorist attack. The House Foreign Affairs Committee Republicans’ report, “Willful Blindness: An Assessment of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Chaos that Followed,” found, among other failures, that “the Biden-Harris administration prioritized the optics of the withdrawal over the security of U.S. personnel on the ground.”

As one of his last acts of a dismal presidency, Biden has called for a national day of mourning for his hero, Jimmy Carter. The federal government will be closed on Thursday, Jan. 9, the same day as Carter’s funeral. As the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted this week in a Carter-Wisconsin connection piece, Biden, a young senator in 1976, was the “first elected official outside Georgia to endorse Carter for the presidency that year.” 

“I think Carter is the guy who can win,” Biden said at a campaign stop in Madison, according to the publication. He described the Georgia peanut farmer as “a good old boy who understands what’s happening in the industrial states.”

In his message to Congress on the death of the 39th president, Biden mused that Carter’s “commitment to a more just world was at the heart of his foreign policy,” He of course mentioned nothing of the debacle in Iran, the hostages, or America’s badly damaged image because of Carter’s foreign policy weakness. 

Hermening, one of the hostages Biden failed to note, said Carter and some of his successors never understood the fundamentals of good foreign policy, that  “you don’t have to use your power, you just have to let people know you’re willing to use it.” 

“And they knew that President Carter was not really willing to use it, much like we’ve seen happen quite often over the last 40 years,” the retired Marine sergeant told me. 

Monday, December 30, 2024

"THe Top 10 Legacy Media Hoaxes this election year"

 


I shamelessly clipped this off "Bongino Reports".  I have repeatedly been told and honestly believe that the legacy media signed their death warrant this past election cycle, when they were soo in the tank for the present administration and the shamelessly mouthpieces reading scripts straight from the DNC printing presses, it kinda burned a lot of people.


CNN reporting on a baseless story about Trump.
Image CreditCNN/YouTube

In no particular order, here are the biggest hoaxes and misinformation campaigns run by corporate media hacktivists this year.

Americans who have lived through Donald Trump’s political career are no strangers to legacy media disinformation. From the Russia collusion hoax to the “very fine people” Charlottesville lie, the litany of dishonest info ops from left-wing activists masquerading as journalists is too long to count.

And despite Americans’ waning trust in their ability to report news accurately and fairly, these Democrat Party yes-men show no signs of stopping.

Like years before it, 2024 saw no shortage of media hijinks. Whether it was their coverage of the 2024 presidential campaign or participation in Democrats’ war on the Supreme Court, America’s propaganda press maintained its ethically bankrupt reputation.

So, in no particular order, here are the biggest hoaxes and misinformation campaigns run by legacy media hacktivists this year.

1. Bloodbath

Taking Trump’s remarks out of context is one of legacy media’s favorite pastimes — and March’s “bloodbath” nontroversy was no exception.

Speaking to rallygoers in Ohio, the former and soon-to-be president warned that the U.S. automobile industry would face an economic “bloodbath” if Democrats won the White House in 2024. Media acolytes quickly jumped on the former president’s comments, which they distorted to make it appear as if Trump was threatening a literal bloodbath if he lost his reelection bid.

Left-wing outlets such as NBC News, CBS News, The New York Times, and others ran headlines using this dishonest framing.

“Trump says country faces ‘bloodbath’ if Biden wins in November,” a March 16 Politico headline reads.

2. War on SCOTUS

While Democrat mouthpiece ProPublica kickstarted a media war on the Supreme Court last year with smear attacks on Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, The New York Times took its hysteria to a whole new level.

In May, the outlet fabricated a controversy about an upside-down American flag flown at the Virginia residence of Alito and his wife, which the outlet claimed was a symbol adopted by “some” “Stop the Steal” protestors on Jan. 6, 2021. Justice Alito told the paper that he “had no involvement whatsoever” in flying the flag, but that it was placed there by his wife to protest a neighbor’s profane yard signs.

Despite claims of ethics violations from so-called “experts,” The Federalist’s Legal Correspondent Margot Cleveland — who researched judicial ethics rules as a law clerk for years — noted that the Gray Lady’s “effort to smear Justice Alito as unethical based on the flag incident cannot withstand scrutiny” and “[t]he calls for Alito to recuse from [Jan. 6-related] cases have no basis in sanity.”

America’s “newspaper of record” wasn’t done attempting to tarnish Alito, however. A few days later, the Times ran another hit piece against the justice over an “Appeal to Heaven” flag flown at one of his homes. While well-known and originating from the Revolutionary War, the Times attempted to gin up controversy over the flag by claiming it represents “a push to remake American government in Christian terms.”

3. Hiding Biden’s Cognitive Decline

If you’re looking for an example of how the media interfere in our elections, look no further than their concentrated effort to hide Joe Biden’s cognitive decline.

When videos showcasing Biden’s senility went viral on social media over the summer, media hacktivists adopted the White House’s baseless claim the clips were “cheap fakes.” Only after the president’s disastrous, lie-filled debate performance against Trump did the media realize they could no longer hide this massive scandal from the public.

Of course, their subsequent acknowledgment of Biden’s faltering health clearly had nothing to do with the republic’s well-being and everything to do with their concerns it could harm Democrats’ prospects of holding the White House in November.

4. Project 2025

It didn’t take long for the media to make The Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025” their go-to bogeyman during the 2024 campaign.

Developed to provide a conservative roadmap for the incoming Trump administration, the plan became the subject of hyperbolic articles and Democrat speeches designed to brainwash voters into believing it would destroy the country as we know it if Trump were to get elected. In actuality, Trump has repeatedly said he was not affiliated with Project 2025, and the proposal recommends policies conservatives have supported for decades.

5. What’s a Border Czar?

After Democrat oligarchs orchestrated a silent coup to replace Biden with Kamala Harris on the 2024 ticket, the media jumped into action to cover up the vice president’s myriad failures — including her role as “border czar.”

To hide Harris’ incompetence from voters, left-wing journos pretended Biden never tapped her to oversee the invasion at the U.S.-Mexico border. Left-wing rags like Axios went as far as to claim Harris “never actually had” the “border czar” moniker — despite the outlet repeatedly referring to her as such in previous articles.

6. Trump’s Arlington Cemetery Visit

Obviously seeking to tarnish Trump ahead of the November election, anti-truth NPR ran an anonymously sourced hit piece attacking the former president for — wait for it — visiting Arlington National Cemetery at the request of Gold Star families.

The smear campaign was aimed at fomenting a controversy about Trump’s team taking photos and videos of the former president’s visit alongside the loved ones of those killed during Biden’s disastrous 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal. The media hoax didn’t sit well with the Gold Star families, who blasted Kamala Harris, Democrats, and, by extension, their corporate press allies for attempting to politicize the event.

7. Show Me the Garbage!

Legacy media propagandists had their hands full in the closing days of the 2024 election after Biden referred to the tens of millions of Americans who support Trump as “garbage.”

Amid fears that the president’s remarks could hurt Harris’ electoral prospects, the “democracy dies in darkness” crowd rushed to cover up the scandal. While Politico’s Johnathan Lemire employed the media’s classic “Republicans pounce!” framing, NPR’s David Folkenflik decided to play doctor and mind reader for a day, telling his X followers he “listened to [Biden’s comments] several times” and came away with the conclusion that the president’s supposed “stutter” problem is to blame.

8. Trump’s Liz Cheney Comments

One of the biggest media-driven hoaxes concocted this year was the manipulation of Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney.

While speaking at an event days before the Nov. 5 election, Trump critiqued Cheney’s obsession with overseas military adventurism. The former president referred to Cheney as a “radical war hawk” and defended the troops forced to fight in the never-ending conflicts neocons like Cheney would never personally partake in.

“Let’s put her with a rifle, standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it … when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘Gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy,’” Trump said.

In the wake of Biden’s “garbage” smear, the media rushed to distort Trump’s comments to make it appear as if he was calling for Cheney to be executed via firing squad. The disinformation operation represented a clear attempt to smear Trump ahead of the election and boost Harris’ prospects.

9. What Assassination Attempts?

If you watched and read nothing but legacy media, there’s a good chance you’d know little to nothing about the two assassination attempts against Trump this year.

After a longtime Democrat donor allegedly tried to kill the incoming president on his Palm Beach golf course in September, left-wing propagandists at NBC News and The Washington Post downplayed the attempted murder as nothing more than an “incident.” Outlets like Time magazine whitewashed the suspect’s history of donating to Democrats, characterizing him in a tweet as a “58-year-old with unclear political ideology.”

[RELATED: Corrupt Media Obsess Over Luigi Mangione After Memory Holing Trump’s Would-Be Assassins]

Such dishonest propaganda isn’t surprising, however. It’s the same playbook these media hacks — who spent years leading an “assassination prep” campaign with horrific smears and lies directed at Trump — deployed when initially “covering” the first assassination attempt against Trump in July.

10. The Atlantic’s Hitler Hysteria

In a last-ditch attempt to salvage Kamala Harris’ flailing presidential bid, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg — who ran the debunked 2020 “suckers” and losers” smear — published an anonymously sourced October hit piece with claims that Trump said he wanted “the kind of generals that Hitler had.” It also contained accusations that Trump expressed anger about paying for the funeral services of a murdered Army soldier.

[RELATED: Debunked Atlantic Hit Piece Gives Kamala Pretext To Justify Political Violence Against Enemies]

To the media, it didn’t matter that the soldier’s sister blasted Goldberg for his anti-Trump fabrications, or that numerous former Trump administration officials debunked the bogus claims. What mattered was regurgitating The Atlantic’s slanderous hatchet job, which they did with no questions asked.