Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Tuesday, October 13, 2026

"The Last Voyage of the South Vietnamese Navy"

 

This is on my scheduler thingie

I originally posted this in 2018 and decided to repost it because the story to me was worth retelling.

I remembered reading about this back in the 1980's, I was studying the Vietnam war extensively since it was the most recent war we had been in and I know the effect that war had on my Dad and how it effected our family and how the war affected America and it took Desert Storm to get past the "Vietnam Syndrome".    I had recalled reading in one of the SOF magazines about the voyage to the Philippines to escape the fall of South Vietnam.  I still believe that we won the battles but lost the war at home due to the anti-war movement, the rules of engagements our troops had to deal with the artificial restrictions from the politicians and the yes men that inhabited the puzzle palace.  I have blogged extensively about the Vietnam war and I guess I am adding to the count.




The USS Kirk carried out one of the most significant humanitarian missions in U.S. military history. Yet the story went untold for 35 years. Correspondent Joseph Shapiro and producer Sandra Bartlett of NPR's Investigative Unit interviewed more than 20 American and Vietnamese eyewitnesses and participants in the events of late April and early May 1975. They studied hundreds of documents, photographs and other records, many never made public before — including cassette tapes recorded at the time by the ship's chief engineer.
Shapiro first learned of the Kirk from Jan Herman, historian of the U.S. Navy Medical Department, who says the Kirk's heroics got lost because, as the Vietnam War ended, Americans were bitterly divided over the war's course and cost. There was little interest in celebrating a mission that saved the lives of 20,000 to 30,000 refugees. Herman is working on a book documenting the story and a film documentary, which was shown when the Kirk crew met for a reunion in Springfield, Va., in July.

On April 30, 1975, North Vietnamese troops entered the deserted streets of Saigon. Tanks crashed through the gates of the presidential palace and soldiers hoisted the yellow and red flag of the Viet Cong.
Just hours before, the last Americans had been evacuated, rescued and flown on Marine helicopters to U.S. Navy aircraft carriers waiting off the coast.
The Vietnam War was officially over. Now those Navy ships were steaming away from Vietnam.
There was one exception. That night, the captain of a small destroyer escort, the USS Kirk, got a mysterious order to head back to Vietnam.

Paul Jacobs, the captain, received the directive from Adm. Donald Whitmire, commander of the evacuation mission — Operation Frequent Wind. He was aboard the USS Blue Ridge, the lead ship of the Navy's 7th Fleet.
The Kirk reached Con Son Island, off the southern coast of Vietnam, on May 1, 1975. There, it was met by 30 South Vietnamese navy ships and dozens of fishing boats and cargo ships — and as many as 30,000 Vietnamese refugees. Hugh Doyle
Jacobs recalls Whitmire's surprise message: "He says, 'We're going to have to send you back to rescue the Vietnamese navy. We forgot 'em. And if we don't get them or any part of them, they're all probably going to be killed.'"
The Kirk was being sent to an island off the Vietnamese mainland — by itself. And there was one more odd thing, the admiral told Jacobs: He'd be taking orders from a civilian.
Richard Armitage came aboard the Kirk late at night, wearing a borrowed sport coat. Years later, Armitage would become second in command to Colin Powell in the Bush administration's State Department. But on that last day of April 1975, he was on a special assignment from the secretary of defense. He'd just turned 30 that week.
Armitage recalls coming aboard the ship and quickly being escorted to the officer's mess where he met with Jacobs and Commodore Donald Roane, commander of the flotilla of Navy destroyers.
"Commodore Roane said something like, 'Young man, I'm not used to having strange civilians come aboard my ship in the middle of the night and give me orders,' " Armitage recalls. "I said, 'I am equally unaccustomed, sir, to coming aboard strange ships in the middle of the night and giving you orders. But steam to Con Son.' And so they did."

The Kirk and its crew of about 260 officers and men were ordered to Con Son Island, about 50 miles off the coast of South Vietnam and not yet occupied by the North Vietnamese. Con Son was the site of a notorious prison. Now, its harbors were the hiding place for the remnants of the South Vietnamese navy.

Armitage had come up with the plan for them to gather there.
Armitage, a graduate of Annapolis, had been a Navy intelligence officer, assigned to Vietnamese units. He gained respect for the South Vietnamese as he worked alongside them and became fluent in the language. Then he resigned his commission and left the Navy in protest when the Nixon administration signed the Paris peace accords. That 1973 agreement between all warring parties in Vietnam ended direct U.S. military involvement in the war. Armitage felt the U.S. had sold out the South Vietnamese.
But as it became clear that the South Vietnam government was about to fall, a Pentagon official asked Armitage to fly back to Vietnam with a dangerous mission. His assignment: to remove or destroy naval vessels and technology so they wouldn't fall into the hands of the Communists.
In 1975, Richard Armitage was a 30-year-old civilian charged with a dangerous mission: to remove or destroy South Vietnamese naval vessels and technology so they wouldn't fall into the hands of the Communists. Later, Armitage would serve as deputy secretary of state from 2001 to 2005, under Secretary of State Colin Powell in the administration of George W. Bush.  Courtesy Richard Armitage
A few weeks before Saigon fell, Armitage had shown up at the office of an old friend, Capt. Kiem Do, deputy chief of staff for the South Vietnamese navy. Together, they came up with the secret plan to rescue the Vietnamese ships when — as was becoming clear would happen — the South Vietnamese government surrendered.
Do remembers warning Armitage that they'd be saving more than ships.
"I told him, I said, 'Well, our crew would not leave Saigon without their family, so therefore there will be a lot of people,' " Do recalls.
He says Armitage remained silent. "He didn't say yes; didn't say no. So I just take it as an acknowledgement," Do says.
Armitage didn't tell his bosses at the Pentagon there would be refugees on those ships. He feared the American authorities wouldn't want them.
Neither Do nor Armitage, though, could predict how many refugees would turn up in Con Son.

The Kirk steamed through the night to Con Son and reached the island just as the sun came up on May 1. There were 30 South Vietnamese navy ships, and dozens of fishing boats and cargo ships. All of them were packed with refugees, desperate to get out of Vietnam.

A boat brings Vietnamese refugees to the Kirk near Con Son Island. The U.S. ship undertook one of the greatest humanitarian missions in the history of the U.S. military.  Hugh Doyle
The ships "were crammed full of people," says Kent Chipman, who in 1975 was a 21-year-old machinist's mate in the ship's engine room and today works at a water purification plant in Texas. "I couldn't see below deck, but above deck the people were just as tight as you could get, side by side."
There was no exact count of how many people were on those ships. Some historical records say there were 20,000 people. Other records suggest it was as many as 30,000. Jan Herman, a historian with the U.S. Navy Medical Department, who is documenting the story of the Kirk, uses the higher number.
"They were rusty, ugly, beat up," says Chipman. "Some of them wouldn't even get under way; they were towing each other. And some of them were actually taking on water and we took our guys over and got the ones under way that would run."
One cargo ship was so heavy it was sinking. People below deck were bailing out the water with their shoes.
Stephen Burwinkel, the Kirk's medic — in the Navy known as a hospital corpsman — boarded that ship to check on the sick and injured. He saw a Vietnamese army lieutenant helping passengers leave the sinking ship, crossing to another ship, over a narrow wooden plank. As people pushed to get off the sinking ship, one man knocked a woman who stopped in front of him. She fell off the plank and into the ocean.
The woman was quickly rescued. But Burwinkel worried that the others on the ship would panic. He says the lieutenant acted quickly.
"This Vietnamese lieutenant did not hesitate, he went right up the back of that guy, took his gun out and shot him in the head, killed him, kicked him over the side. Stopped all the trouble right then and there," Burwinkel recalls. The shooting was shocking, he says, but it very likely prevented a riot.

After fixing what could be fixed on the seaworthy vessels and transferring people from the ships that would be left behind, the Kirk led the flotilla of naval ships, fishing boats and cargo ships toward the Philippines.
The USS Cook, another destroyer escort, like the Kirk, helped out as the ships were leaving Con Son. The Cook's crew provided rice, and its corpsman helped Burwinkel and his assistant from the Kirk attend to the sick and injured, too.
As the flotilla headed out to sea, on the way to the Philippines, other Navy ships came in and out of the escort, according to Herman. Among those other ships were the USS Mobile, USS Tuscaloosa, USS Barbour County, USS Deliver and USS Abnaki.
But it's clear from the daily logs from the Kirk and the other ships that the crew of the Kirk took the lead.
"For me, the Kirk was ideal," says Armitage, who moved from the Kirk to the Vietnamese navy's flagship. "It could communicate with the rest of the U.S. fleet. They would go with us across to the Philippines and would be able to rescue any of the folks who might be in harm's way. Some had been wounded. Some were pregnant. All were sick after a while. And we needed a way to take care of those folks."
The Kirk's sailors kept busy providing food, water and medicine to people on the South Vietnamese ships.
The South Vietnamese fleet follows the USS Kirk to Subic Bay in the Philippines. The Kirk's final mission at the end of the Vietnam War was to bring the remnants of the South's navy to safety in the Philippines.  Hugh Doyle
Burwinkel spent his time moving from ship to ship treating the sick and injured. With thousands of people — many of them babies and children — he had to work almost nonstop.
"When they gave me the meritorious service medal over all this, I quite frankly referred to it as my 'no-sleep' medal," says Burwinkel, who made a career in the Navy and is now retired and living in Pensacola, Fla. "I would go out there and do my thing and at dark we would come back to the Kirk and try to get a little bit to eat and make some rounds — gather my wits about me, resupply myself and get ready for the next day."
Last Sovereign Territory Of The Republic Of Vietnam'
Of the some 30,000 refugees on vessels escorted by the Kirk over six days, only three died.
But as the flotilla approached the Philippines, the Kirk's captain got some bad news. The presence of South Vietnamese vessels in a Philippine port would present the government in Manila with a diplomatic predicament.
The Philippine government wasn't going to allow us in, period, because these ships belonged to the North Vietnamese now and they didn't want to offend the new country," Jacobs, the captain, recalls.
The government of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos was one of the first to recognize the Communist rulers now in control of a single Vietnam, and Jacobs was told the ships should go back.
Armitage and his South Vietnamese friend, Capt. Do, came up with a solution that Marcos had to accept.
Do recalls the plan: "We will raise the American flag and lower the Vietnamese flag as a sign of transfer [of] the ship back to the United States, because during the war those ships are given to the Vietnamese government as a loan, if you want, from the United States, to fight the Communists. Now the war is over, we turn them back to the United States."
There was a frantic search to find 30 American flags. Two officers from the Kirk were sent aboard each Vietnamese ship to take command after a formal flag ceremony.
Rick Sautter was one of the Kirk officers who took command of a Vietnamese ship.
"That was the last vestige of South Vietnam. And when those flags came down and the American flags went up, that was it. Because a Navy ship is sovereign territory and so that was the last sovereign territory of the Republic of Vietnam," he says.
"Thousands and thousands of people on the boats start to sing the [South Vietnamese] national anthem. When they lower the flag, they cry, cry, cry," Do remembers.

On May 7, the ships flying American flags were allowed into Subic Bay.
For the refugees, it was just the beginning of their long journey, which took them to Guam and then resettlement in the United States.
For the sailors of the Kirk, ending the Vietnam War by rescuing 20,000 to 30,000 people was very satisfying.
"This was the high point of my career and I'm very proud of what we did, what we accomplished, how we did it," Jacobs says. "I felt like we handled it truly professionally and that was kind of a dark time."

Armitage says he "envied" the officers and men of the USS Kirk. The ship had not seen combat on its tour to Vietnam. But it ended with the rescue of tens of thousands of refugees, one of the greatest humanitarian missions in the history of the U.S. military.
Says Armitage: "They weren't burdened with the former misadventure of Vietnam."
This article originally appeared on NPR.org, September 1, 2010 by Joseph Shapiro & Sandra Bartlett.  Here's the original link to this story:

Monday, October 12, 2026

Monday Music "Take On Me" By A-ha

 

 this was the first "cd" that I saw.  My roommate in AIT at Fort Devens had bought a CD player for $400 at the PX.  The sound quality was incredible compared to the cassette and LP's that were prevalent at the time.    The video was also awe inspiring.  It was cutting edge the way they combined "real life" and the sketches.    We would watch video's in the day room before we would march to class.  MTV was very popular for all of us "young soldiers".  I saw Whitney Houston for the first time when she sang " How will I know"   a good song.  I also saw level 42 and a few others for the first time on MTV in the day room.  Like I have said in the past, I woould associate music with certain times and places in my life.


    
"Take on Me" is a song by the Norwegian synthpop band A-ha. Written by the band members, the song was produced by Alan Tarney for the group's debut studio album Hunting High and Low, (1985). The song combines synthpop with a varied instrumentation that includes acoustic guitars, keyboards, and drums.
The original "Take on Me" was recorded in 1984 and took three releases to chart in the United Kingdom, reaching number two on the UK Singles Chart in November 1985. In the United States, the song was the only A-ha song to ever reach the top position of the Billboard Hot 100 in October 1985, due in no small part to the wide exposure of its memorable and cutting-edge music video on MTV, directed by Steve Barron. The video features the band in a pencil-sketch animation method called rotoscoping, combined with live action. The video won six awards and was nominated for two others at the 1986 MTV Video Music Awards. In 2013, both Cuban-America born rapper, Pitbull, along with American recording artist, Christina Aguilera, took a heavy sample of the song and for their hit song, "Feel This Moment", which, although not a cover version, charted at number five in the UK Charts and number eight in the US Billboard Hot 100 while they charted number one on both the dance charts in both of the respective countries.

Lead singer Morten Harket and actress Bunty Bailey in a scene from the music video, which features them in a pencil-sketch animation / live-action combination called rotoscoping

The first release of "Take on Me" in 1984 includes a completely different recording, and was featured in the first video, which shows the band singing with a blue background. The second video was directed by Steve Barron, and filmed at Kim's Café and on a sound stage in London, in 1985. The video used a pencil-sketch animation / live-action combination called rotoscoping, in which the live-action footage is traced-over frame by frame to give the characters realistic movements. Approximately 3,000 frames were rotoscoped, which took 16 weeks to complete.
The video's main theme is a romantic fantasy narrative. It begins with a montage of pencil drawings in a comic book style representing motorcycle sidecar racing, in which the hero, played by Morten Harket, is pursued by two opponents, one of whom is played by English actor Philip Jackson. It then cuts to a scene in a cafe, in which a young woman, played by Bunty Bailey (Harket's girlfriend at the time), is seen drinking coffee and reading the comic book in a coffee shop. As the girl reads, the waitress brings her the bill. The comic's hero, after winning the race, seemingly winks at the girl from the page. His pencil-drawn hand reaches out of the comic book, inviting the girl into it. Once inside, she too appears in the pencil-drawn form, as he sings to her and introduces her to his black-and-white world which features a sort of looking-glass portal where people and objects look real on one side and pencil-drawn on the other.
Meanwhile, back in the restaurant, the waitress returns to find that the girl is not there. Believing that the girl has left without paying the bill, she angrily crumples and throws the girl's comic book into a bin. This makes Harket's two opposing racers reappear, armed with a large pipe wrench and apparently aggressive. The racers smash the looking glass with the pipe wrench, evidently trapping the girl in the comic book. Harket punches one of the thugs and retreats with the girl into a maze of paper. Arriving at a dead end, he tears a hole in the paper wall so that the girl can escape as the menacing opposing racers close in on him. The girl, now back in the real world and found lying beside the bin to the surprise of restaurant guests and staff, grabs the comic from the bin and runs home, where she attempts to smooth out the creases to learn what happens next.


The next panel shows Harket lying seemingly lifeless, and the girl begins to cry. But he wakes up and tries to break out of his comic-book frames. At the same time, his image appears in the girl's hallway, seemingly torn between real and comic form, hurling himself repeatedly left-and-right against the walls as he attempts to shatter his two-dimensional barrier. (This scene is largely patterned after a climactic scene in the 1980 film Altered States). He escapes from the comic book by becoming human and stands up. Smiling, the girl runs towards him and he embraces her. The video story is effectively concluded in the intro sequence of its successor, "The Sun Always Shines on T.V.".
At the 1986 MTV Video Music Awards, the video for "Take on Me" won six awards—Best New Artist in a Video, Best Concept Video, Most Experimental Video, Best Direction, Best Special Effects, and Viewer's Choice—and was nominated for two others, Best Group Video and Video of the Year. It was also nominated for Favorite Pop/Rock Video at the 13th American Music Awards i
n 1986.

Friday, October 9, 2026

"Did Churchill and Hitler Ever Meet?

 This was a "Quora" question, and yes it "almost" happened, but Hitler did a "No-show".  I thought it was an interesting question.


In late summer 1932, Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler nearly dined together at a Munich hotel, until one blunt question caused Hitler to stand Churchill up.

At the time, Churchill was in his "wilderness years"—out of power and holding no official government office. He was traveling through Germany researching a biography of his ancestor, the Duke of Marlborough, and settled into Munich's Hotel Regina.

Adolf Hitler (left), Hermann Göring (center), and Ernst 'Putzi' Hanfstaengl (right) in Berlin in 1932. Hanfstaengl served as Hitler's foreign press chief and attempted to arrange the dinner meeting with Churchill. Photo by Deutsches Bundesarchiv is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 de.

Also staying at the Hotel Regina was Ernst "Putzi" Hanfstaengl, an eccentric, Harvard-educated German-American who served as Hitler's foreign press chief. Hanfstaengl recognized Churchill and introduced himself. Eager to bridge a connection between the rising Nazi leader and the famous British statesman, Hanfstaengl mentioned that Hitler was coming to the hotel that evening and suggested they meet for dinner. Churchill agreed.

Later that day, while having drinks with Hanfstaengl, Churchill probed his new acquaintance about the Nazi party's aggressive policies. Churchill remarked that he could understand being angry with people who have done wrong, but asked, "Why is your chief so violent about the Jews? ... What is the sense of being against a man simply because of his birth? How can any man help how he is born?"

Hanfstaengl, recognizing the danger of bringing such a critical stance to his boss, rushed off to relay the conversation to Hitler, hoping the Nazi leader would still see political value in the meeting. Instead, Hitler refused to join him. He reportedly dismissed the invitation entirely, asking, "What part does Churchill play? He is in opposition and nobody attends to him."

Hitler never appeared, standing Churchill up. The two men never crossed paths. Churchill later wrote in his memoirs that this near-miss in Munich was the only time he ever came close to speaking with the man he would eventually lead Britain against in the Second World War.

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

"Cellphone and Laptop Battery Catch Fire in airplane"

 

I get news from commercial airplane incidents from a 3rd party source.  No, I am NOT picking on American Airlines, this could have happened to any of them.   The crew did a bang up job handling it quickly and professionally, hats off to them.  I will see if I can get a more detailed report in several months.    I grabbed this for educational purposes only.

I pulled this from the FAA Website.

(This is a summary. Find full details in the FAA’s PackSafe webpages.)

Lithium batteries, which power everyday devices, can catch fire if damaged or if battery terminals are short-circuited.
Devices containing lithium metal batteries or lithium-ion batteries, including – but not limited to – smartphones, tablets, cameras, and laptops, should be kept in accessible carry-on baggage. If these devices are packed in checked baggage, they should be turned completely off, protected from accidental activation, and packed so they are protected from damage. Requirements vary based on the type of device and size of battery, and on the air carrier’s restrictions.

Spare (uninstalled) lithium metal batteries and lithium-ion batteries, portable rechargers, electronic cigarettes, and vaping devices are prohibited in checked baggage. They must be carried with the passenger in carry-on baggage and remain accessible. Smoke and fire incidents involving lithium batteries can be mitigated by the cabin crew and passengers inside the aircraft cabin.

If carry-on baggage is checked at the gate or planeside, spare lithium batteries, portable rechargers or power banks, electronic cigarettes, and vaping devices must be removed from the baggage and kept with the passenger in the aircraft cabin. Even in carry-on baggage, these items should remain accessible and be protected from damage, accidental activation and short circuits. Battery terminals should be protected by manufacturer’s packaging or covered with tape and placed in separate bags to prevent short circuits.

Damaged, defective, or recalled lithium batteries, or recalled devices containing lithium batteries, must not be carried in carry-on or checked baggage as they are likely to be a safety concern by overheating or catching on fire.

When in doubt, leave it out.

Check the FAA’s Pack Safe website for the rules on carrying different types of battery-powered devices, such as luggage trackers, mobility aids, or personal electronics, and other dangerous goods in baggage.

   On our planes we have special bags above the first aid/AED kits for the "runaways"  The crew places the device in the bag and seal it to cut off the oxygen and handle it in a similar manner.   



American A319 at Atlanta on Sep 29th 2026, laptop and cell phone caught fire

Last Update: October 2, 2026 / 19:51:22 GMT/Zulu time

Photo of American Airlines N749US, Airbus A319

American Airlines N749US, Airbus A319 (Photo credit: TDelCoro / Flickr / License: CC BY-SA 4.0)

Incident Facts

Date of incident
Sep 29, 2026

Classification
Incident

Airline
American Airlines

Flight number
AA-1400

Departure
Miami, United States

Destination
Atlanta, United States

Aircraft Registration
N749US

Aircraft Type
Airbus A319

ICAO Type Designator
A319

An American Airlines Airbus A319-100, registration N749US performing flight AA-1400 from Miami,FL to Atlanta,GA (USA), was descending through 15000 feet towards Atlanta when the crew declared emergency reporting a laptop and a cell phone had caught fire in the cabin. Cabin crew contained the devices in a galley cart, the flight crew requested emergency services to meet the aircraft in case the device re-ignited. The aircraft landed on runway 09R about 15 minutes later.

The aircraft returned to service about 10 hours after landing.


Tuesday, October 6, 2026

"The Camp Of The Saints" Parisian Edition

 

I'm sure y'all have seen the pics and video's of the rioting and looting and other mayhem of the activities going on in Paris.  I saw a bunch of migrants chasing a French police women and I felt bad for her because I was having images of the captives from October 7 From Israel.  The French Prime Minister could call in the troops and tell them to put down the rioters with extreme prejudice (shoot them, as a warning to chill the Fvck out) but he don't have the stones or the backbone to do it,  he might be called a meanie.  So his capital burns and the citizens are attacked by the recent arrivals and nothing is done.  It will be covered up as in the past.  Same as it is done in other western European countries.  Poland and the Eastern European nations have the right idea.

   For those that are interested, "Amazon has the book"   And no, I get nothing out of the plug.  I ain't that smart to figure that out yet.   

      And yes I shamelessly ripped this off from Michael Smith.


I don’t care if I am called a racist, a bigot or a xenophobe for this for one primary reason: I don’t care what color a savage is, my concern is what the savage does when he encounters a permissive, free, civil society, one far more productive, successful, and far softer than the savage is programmed to accept.
I am as concerned about how that permissive, free, civil society reacts when it comes into direct contact with the savage.
There are savages of all colors, races, ethnicities and national origin – both foreign AND native born. It is a description of an ethos and culture, one that rejects moral and intellectual advancement and invokes the idea embodied in the ancient right of conquest, that anyone has a right to something they have the power and the will to take.
Might makes right. I keep what I conquer. Only the strong survive, the weak are to be subjugated or destroyed.
Our peaceful existence (rooted in Western civilization) has been a relative aberration of history, mankind has been significantly more visceral and violent in the past – and we have taken the peace and security for granted for so long, we no longer recognize the risks to it - or even understand how to fight the enemies of it – and as I have said many times, there are no innocent bystanders this time around, the fight is coming to us, the same way it is coming to the people of Paris.
Here is something I believe is an irrefutable truth: any civilization that ceases to believe it has a moral right to exist will eventually become incapable of defending its existence.
There is no better illustration than these two stories, one from Sweden, where a woman was raped by an Iraqi asylum seeker on a train and initially resisted involving police because she felt sorry for him, fearing he would be deported, and the other from Germany in which the rape victim allegedly concealed her attacker’s refugee/ethnic identity because she feared appearing to perpetuate racism.
The global left has been doing two things for the past 50 years, 1) they have been working to delegitimize the moral right to exist for every country in the West and 2) they have been allying with savages, in some cases bribing them with welfare programs to act as mercenaries to fight in their stead when countries refuse to defend their people and culture.
I’ve been urging people who haven’t read The Camp of the Saints (Le Camp des Saints), the 1973 dystopian novel by French writer Jean Raspail, to look it up, get a copy, and read it.
Because the 53-year-old novel is playing out in real time in Paris.
The plot begins in India, where an enormous fleet of decrepit ships sets sail for Europe carrying roughly one million impoverished migrants. The flotilla eventually heads toward the Mediterranean coast of France.
The French government knows it is coming and possesses the military capability to prevent the landing. The real conflict of the novel, however, isn’t military. It is moral and psychological.
As the fleet approaches, France becomes paralyzed by arguments over humanitarianism, racism, colonial guilt, Christianity, human rights, and Western responsibility for global poverty. Journalists, intellectuals, clergy, activists, and political figures increasingly portray resistance to the migrants as immoral. Government officials fear that using force will make France guilty of atrocities.
Raspail depicts this as a kind of cascading loss of confidence. Soldiers ordered to defend the coast begin questioning whether they have the moral authority to do so. Civilians evacuate southern France. Political leaders hesitate. Institutions that theoretically exist to defend the country become incapable of acting because the society no longer agrees that defending itself is morally legitimate.
Eventually the migrant fleet lands essentially unopposed. The French state begins to collapse, and similar migrations occur elsewhere. By the end, Raspail presents Western civilization as being overwhelmed less because it lacked military or economic power than because it lost the will to preserve itself.
If that sounds familiar, it should. We have been witness to about three decades of exactly that plot.
The enduring influence and notoriety of Camp of the Saints is largely because of its prophetic foretelling of mass migration, the resulting European demographic change, and the conflicts that arise.
Critics regard it as racist, xenophobic, and dehumanizing because Raspail frequently portrays the migrants collectively and grotesquely rather than as fully developed individuals – but as they say, “if the shoe fits, one must wear it.”
It isn’t racist because, as I noted, savagery isn’t dependent upon race. It is cultural.
I think it was Ann Coulter who said that in the fight between the civilized man and the uncivilized man, side with the civilized man.
There is an interesting connection to the line of thought I’ve been exploring around Popper’s paradox of tolerance because The Camp of the Saints is essentially an extreme fictional thought experiment asking what happens when a society decides that virtually every act of self-preservation is morally suspect.
Its deeper question isn’t simply “What happens if millions of “migrants” and “refugees” are imported?”
The real question is what happens when a civilization can no longer articulate why it is entitled to say no to the invasion that is being sponsored by its own governments.