The civil disobedience continues.....in the blue zone

There is a Movement in the blue states(The states in the northeast corridor) that are overwhelming "blue" I.E Vote Democrat no matter what.  There are a lot of pissed off people and they flat out will not register their firearms with the state that is demanding that they do so. The states pushed through these edicts after the new-town shooting hoping to capitalize on the emotions to run through their disarmament schemes on the citizens.   The states in question being Connecticut and New York  are giving firearm owners a "second chance" to register their EBR(Evil black Rifles) and hundreds of thousands of people will not do it.  I think the states in question will try to raid a few houses whose people were "late" in registering them to make "examples" out of them in defying the edicts of the state.  After a few are killed or their house is ransacked and their pet is gunned down."In the name of officer Safety..Of course"  the other people will start fighting back and I am not sure that the state police will be so froggy to jump through the next door.  This is a massive civil disobedience going on and many people are pissed.

      many others are leaving the state as have several businesses moved to more gun friendly areas of the country.   People have asked me why am I such a 2nd amendment zealot.  I reply, " I have seen the Nazi Death camps" and what happens when the state can by imperial fiat shove people into a cattle car and send them off to be killed and they have no recourse because the state had the guns and the people didn't have any.

If you are not sure what those are...Those are the scratches made by fingernails of the people that were stuck in the "Showers" and were trying to get out.   When you see this stuff, it leaves an indelible impression.
     The following article is from the jpfo.org. they are a jewish 2nd amendment organization, that has scads of research and other material in support of the 2nd amendment. 


They're burning registration forms! They're rallying by the thousands. They're pledging civil disobedience. They're swearing to resist, to disobey, even if it makes them felons. They're angry, they're defiant, they've had it and they aren't going to take it any more.
Who are they? No, they're not 1960s draft resisters. They're not anti-nuke activists or scruffy Occupy Wall Street protestors. Heck, chances are some of them actually work on Wall Street.
They are the gun owners of the bluest blue states. They're the respectable men and women of the mid-Atlantic region. They're people who have, in the past, submitted to the rules even when they didn't like them -- or at least kept their mouths shut about their non-compliance.
But not any more.
The spate of pointless blue-state legislation against "assault weapons" and standard-capacity magazines that followed the Newtown school shooting sought -- as usual -- to punish millions of people who didn't commit the crime by registering or outright banning firearms that just happen to look scary to hoplophobes.
This time it didn't work.

• In New York, where owners of "assault weapons" have until April 15 to register them, thousands burned registration paperwork instead.
• In Connecticut, the December 31, 2013 register-or-surrender deadline passed -- and was resoundingly ignored by an estimated 85 percent of its intended targets. (And that's despite the fact that, unlike New York, where it's a misdemeanor, failure to register is a felony in Connecticut.) TheBlaze.com reported, "...officials and some lawmakers are stunned."
• In New Jersey, as a particularly ridiculous bill loaded with unintended consequences moved through the legislature, lawmakers had to face a nine-year-old competitive shooter who threatened to move out of state. (Not to mention a tongue-in-cheek campaign by the New Jersey Second Amendment Society to send gun magazines to some bigoted politicians.)
• Meanwhile, 19 states and 34 congresspeople, and the NRA sued New Jersey over one of its existing bad gun laws.
• Rhode Island gun-rights activists have so far managed to keep a host of ugly bills bottled up on committee while frustrating one state senator so badly he spewed an obsenity at a Second Amendment supporter. They also elected themselves some hopefully more rights-friendly politicians, too.
• While individual Maryland gun owners have been quieter about the "merely bad" law inflicted upon them, Maryland-based Beretta objected enough to announce it would be expanding -- in Tennessee

In some cases, anti-gun legislators ended up shooting themselves in the foot. In the months after Newtown, some Delaware politicians hoped to pass "reasonable" victim-disarmament legislation. But when a staffer mistakenly introduced a bill that revealed their real intention, they had to withdraw the bill and slink away. Their intended victims were onto them -- and could prove it.
Rage and resistance continue to build. A rally in Connecticut on April 5 drew as many as 5,000 gun owners, some lawfully bearing arms. (David Codrea was its keynote speaker.
As New York's registration deadline looms, "hardly anyone is signing up."
It seems people have not only had it with absurd, pointless gun laws. They may have finally grasped that registration leads to confiscation.
Taken one-by-one, these developments don't seem to mean much. Taken together, they're an absolutely remarkable record of resistance -- with more to come.
In old Hollywood movies and before that, in even older novels there was a phrase: "The natives are restless." This phrase usually turned up just before said natives went on a rampage against clueless "civilized" people. At that moment in the movies, you'd hear the sound of beating drums and angry hubub in a language that none of the "civilized" people could comprehend.
Well ... the natives (of formerly complacent blue states) are getting restless indeed. And too many clueless anti-gun politicians are still failing to comprehend the language of gun rights.
Just as in those old movies, this is not likely to end well for those who seek to dominate "the natives."

The New APP for marking "Dangerous Gun Owners"

This is rich....Some company is making an APP where you can *narc* on your neighbor if you believe that he is a "Gun Nut".   Talking about doing the work for STASI the ATF,FBI,CIA,IRS,DHS,NSA and other alphabet federal and state agencies that want you to squeal on your neighbors.  Wonder if they will get extra food rations in the Obama economy for pimping out their neighbors.   Have a dispute with your neighbor, call the federal government and say that the person that you don't like is an "extremist" and pop a cold one, relax in the lawn chair and watch your neighbor's house get tossed, their dogs shot and if they are lucky, they will only be splayed out in their yard.  If they are unlucky, they will be on the way to the morgue because of the propensity of the local law enforcement to do a "hard knock" on people that they might have a problem with.  If I sound like I am bashing the police..I am not, I remember when "Police Officer" meant "Peace Officer".  Well that shows my age I guess.  I don't care for the militarization of the Police.  I see tragedy happening if this APP gets off the ground.  Even though the designers say that they have "safeguards" to prevent "abuse"...Yeah right.....You believe that?  Well I have some oceanfront property in Nebraska I will sell you.  You can watch the sun rise in the west sitting on your balcony while sipping some Starbucks.  Small bills, non-sequential numbers if you please.  I remember something during my research a while back on the Stasi the East German security police.  1 out of 7 "Osties" spied on their neighbors for either money, usually extra rations or privileges.  I can see the same thing happen here.  What happened to our freedom, people are willing to give up our birthright for some extra government cheese.

An App For ‘Marking Dangerous Gun Owners’ Ready For Abuse By Anti-Gun Crowd

July 10, 2013 by Sam Rolley

Geo Gun Marker, a smartphone app created by Walkingtools, which describes itself as “a loose confederation of software and related art or education projects,” allows users to electronically log the locations of “potentially unsafe guns and gun owners.”
A description of the app, available at the Google Play store, reads as follows:

Geolocate Dangerous Guns and Owners with the Gun Geo Marker. Geolocation means marking dangerous sites on the App’s map so that you and others can be aware of the risks in your neighborhood.
The Gun Geo Marker operates very simply, letting parents and community members mark, or geolocate, sites associated with potentially unsafe guns and gun owners. These locations are typically the homes or businesses of suspected unsafe gun owners, but might also be public lands or other locations where guns are not handled safely, or situations where proper rights to own or use any particular type of firearm may not exist. Electronically marking these locations can help others in the area learn about their geography of risk from gun accidents or violence. No matter what your safety concern with firearms might be, you should feel free to use this tool to provide the most accurate information you can such that others can make their own safety decisions.

The app states that it is to be used to electronically log the location of only “potentially unsafe guns and gun owners”— but judging by the gun control proposals pushed by anti-gun zealots throughout the Nation over the past several months, it’s obvious that there is no way of knowing who classifies what as a dangerous gun or gun owner.
Never fear, the app makers offer some guidelines. 
Here’s who they say you shouldn’t mark:

• Hunters or gun enthusiasts who safely store and properly enjoy their weapons in the field, or at local firing ranges for recreational purposes.

• You should not be concerned merely because your neighbors are a member of any national gun advocacy organization. The actual threat – just to cite the best known org – that the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its kin present to you and your children is political.

• Finally, there is at least one particular situation in which you should certainly not use the Walkingtools Gun Geo Marker. If you have direct, personal knowledge or even a suspicion that guns are being used in context of organized criminal activity, then it may be extremely risky for you to mark related locations. You should forget about the Walkingtools Gun Geo Marker in all such cases, and instead consider getting appropriate law enforcement agencies involved in the situation.

The last point is one that seems to negate the need for the app in the first place: if someone is using a gun in a dangerous (criminal) manner, call the police.
Here’s who the app makers want marked:

• Note that while people who keep loaded firearms in their home should not necessarily have their location marked as a gun owner of concern, studies do show conclusively that guns in the home greatly increase the chances of death by gunfire for the owner, family members and visitors. This is especially the case with guns kept unlocked and loaded for “personal safety.”

• First time gun owners or others who may not have not taken basic gun safety training, or who were not raised in a culture of gun safety, represent a real and present danger to their community, themselves and their family members. Their locations may be marked at any time. Bear in mind that these people are most often well meaning, thus as a concerned neighbor you might very well be able to educate them and therefore avoid marking their location.

• A more obvious category of dangerous neighbor is someone who frequently displays or brandishes weapons, or those reveal their gun ownership status during normal conflict resolution. Such people are potentially a very serious concern, and the home or business locations of potential high conflict gun owners should be marked only when feasible. The same goes for any neighbor whose children speak frequently of their parent’s gun ownership, or who talk about guns as a potential tools for conflict resolution.

• There are many locations, such as remote public or private lands where the discharge of firearms is legal. If you frequent such a location, you are likely a gun owner yourself and moreover, you probably have a strong interest in re-establishing safety standards at these sites.

And here are some options for marking gun threats in the app:

• “Possible unlocked/loaded/unsafe storage”

• “Possible insufficient training”

• “Guns and unsupervised children”

• “Guns and substance abuse”

• “Possible medical related concern”

• “Neighborhood talk, unsafe”

• “Possible high conflict, armed neighbor”

• “Possible out of place, large arsenal”

• “Documented/frequent unlawful discharge”

• “Possible illegal weapons on premises”

• “Possible prohibited persons”

• “Possible anti-government/terror threat”

• “Other concern (describe)”

Perhaps a better—and less obviously made for and by people who dislike guns— version of the app would simply let people mark the locations of potentially dangerous people? Of course, an even better option would be for folks to mind their own business and focus on their own self-preservation and family protection without resorting to an app designed to spread gossip about gun owners.