Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Showing posts with label airports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label airports. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

The Airports and Airlines quickly goto"Mask Optional"after courtruling

 People are soo tired of "Mask Mandates", I heard of cheering on airplanes when pilots announced the rulings while in the middle of the flights.  The CDC is pushing for the DOJ to reinstate the mandates, I guess we are not "worthy enough" yet.

Reagan National Airport
s

The U.S. airline industry has quickly adapted to a recent decision by a Federal judge in Florida determining the mask mandate exceeds the authority of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 

In a decision handed down on April 18, judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle concluded the mandate violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The court remanded the mask mandate to the CDC for further proceeding. 

Initially, there was confusion whether the judge’s ruling would take immediate effect, but the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) quickly stated it would no longer enforce mask use on public transpiration and at transportation hubs. 

After TSA announced its decision, U.S. airlines followed suit and stated that masks for passengers and employees would be optional going forward. Many airports have also dropped masks requirements, but not all have opted to rescind the mandate. 

Both the TSA and White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki noted that the CDC continues to recommend that people wear masks in indoor public transportation settings. 

Psaki called the court’s decision disappointing and noted the Justice Department (DOJ) would make any determinations about litigation. So far, the DOJ has not responded to the judge’s decision. 

Prior to Judge Mizelle’s decision, the administration opted to extend the mask mandate from April 18 to May 3. 

 

 

Thursday, August 1, 2013

TSA......again...in the news....for misconduct.....again.....


I ripped this off from ABC news via Yahoo.  As an airline employee I get a benefit of "free flying"  provided that there are empty seats where you have to go.  if the plane is full....guess what...you wait for the next plane and hope you get lucky.  I have flown a lot with Delta Airlines and our "flying benefits" are very generous compared to most airlines.  My family flys free, my Mom and Dad and my stepparents also fly for free.  Like I said, very generous allowances.  And when I fly, the gate agents and the air crews have been very good.   We at Delta know what days NOT to fly....around holidays...Monday, Friday and Sunday are difficult to fly for us.  Paying passengers get on first, and they are usually flying to and fro on those days so catching a flight is difficult.  People have said that the sky's are not so friendly as they used to be.  And from what I have seen, I tend to agree.  I believe that TSA has a lot to do with that.  After getting manhandled by the TSA trying to board, peoples temper gets short.  I have meet some very friendly and professional TSA people, they are a credit to their organization and a pleasure to deal with .  That being said, I have met some real pricks, those that what I call      " Badge Heavy".  They view their job and what authority they have as an excuse to hassle people...just for sport.  And most people will not complain...if they do, they get singled out  " for additional screening" and they miss their flight and the airlines will not refund their tickets because they were held up at security.  It is a no win for them...so they bide their time and grit their teeth, then when they get on the airplane, they are already pissed and lash out at either another passenger or at the aircrew.   I have been hassled by TSA and I dare not make a scene, for all they have to do is notify my employer and I am gone, history, outta here.  So I grit my teeth and deal with it.  My son has flown with me many times on the day trips that I take him on and so far he hasn't been hassled, that would be my Rubicon.   But I am not surprised that TSA has been busted again for misconduct.  When you work for the Feds, you have job security and it is difficult to fire a dirt-bag.  The civil service procedures are lengthy for a reason, to prevent employees from being disciplined for whistle-blowing or for not assisting in political patronage of certain groups...The IRS seems to be exempt from this belief however.  For this reason it is difficult to get rid of the dirt-bags.  In the meantime, they abuse the flying public.

Transportation Security Administration officers were cited for more than 9,600 cases of misconduct from 2010 to 2012, according to a new government report that shows agency employees often received light punishments for sneaking prohibited items past scanners or napping on the job.
The report, released Tuesday by the Government Accountability Office, found nearly 2,000 cases of screeners who were sleeping, not following procedures or allowing relatives to bypass security checkpoints. More than 3,000 screeners showed up late, not at all or left the job without permission, GAO reported.
In one instance of misconduct, a security officer left a checkpoint to help a relative check in and then came back with the family member's bag and allowed it to go around security. A TSA supervisor saw the misconduct and insisted the bag be screened, according to the report.
The bag contained "prohibited items" after it was finally screened. The report did not elaborate on the nature of the items in the bag. The screener was eventually suspended for seven days.
TSA Workers Allegedly Stealing From Passengers and Sleeping on Duty
The report also cited 56 cases of theft during the three-year span. In an undercover investigation by ABC News in 2012, 10 iPads were left at airport security checkpoints throughout the nation with a history of theft. Nine out of ten were returned, but one TSA officer, who was later fired, denied he stole an iPad when ABC News tracked the device to his home in Orlando.
But the report suggests the TSA is doing a poor job tracking the offenses and is not always handing out the punishment it should. The GAO's evaluation of TSA's 2012 data shows that 50 percent of the workers accused of sleeping on the job received less than the lowest penalty called for by TSA policies.
Forty-seven percent of the cases that GAO analyzed resulted in letters of reprimand, 31 percent resulted in suspensions of a definite duration and 17 percent resulted in the employee's removal from TSA.
"I get worried about this because in the history of air terrorism, employee security has been the one gap that has been the hardest gap to cover," aviation security expert Jeff Price.
The Top 20 Airports for TSA Theft
Following the report, the TSA released a statement saying, it holds their workers to "the highest ethical standards" and has "zero tolerance for misconduct."
"TSA concurs with GAO's four recommendations to ensure that the agency establishes a process to verify that TSA staff at airports are in compliance, and is already working to implement these recommendations," the agency added.
There are more than 56,000 screeners at the nation's airports, most doing their jobs, but the GAO's report points out the persistent and ongoing problem with those who are failing to comply with federal regulations.
Two subcommittees of the House Homeland Security Committee will hold a hearing later today to examine how the TSA responds to reports of misbehavior and unethical conduct by its employees.
TSA Deputy Administrator John W. Halinski will represent the agency on Capitol Hill.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

TSA approves private screeners in Orlanda

I work in the aviation field and I do fly as a perk of my employment, that being said, I believe the biggest reason for the people having problems with the airlines is the TSA, after getting prodded, xrayed and herded like cattle and felt belittled by the heavy handed tactics of the TSA, after getting stuff confiscated, or out right stolen, people board airplanes already in a surly mood so it doesn't take much for anything on the airplane to set people off.  Think about it...you can't lash out at the TSA, they can capriciously decide to not let you board just to prove who has the bigger dick,  so you take it out on the airline employee that works for a private company.  A private company that is responsible for customer service whereas with the TSA customer service is not a factor. they are by God a professional federalized union workforce that contributed money to the democrats so customer service....they will keep you form boarding the airplane....Customer service...?..Yeah right.
    I hope this is a trend that continues.....

Posted at 06:00 AM ET, 06/18/2012

TSA tentatively okays private screeners in Orlando

The Transportation Security Administration has given preliminary approval to a plan that would allow Orlando Sanford International Airport to use private security screeners.
Eye Opener Screeners employed by private companies are already used at 16 airports under the agency’s Screening Partnership Program. Republicans have pressed for greater use of private screeners and welcomed last week’s announcement.
“I hope this opens a new era of reform for TSA operations, not only at Orlando Sanford but across the nation,” said Rep. John L. Mica (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. “It’s critical that TSA get out of the business of running a huge bureaucracy and human resources operation and refocus its attention on security, analyzing intelligence, and setting the highest risk-based security standards. TSA needs to focus on going after terrorists — not little old ladies, veterans and children.”
Democrats and the union representing TSA officers, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), have opposed privatization of the workforce that screens people and luggage at the nation’s airports.
In February, AFGE President John Gage told Congress: “The mission of corporations is to make profits from the shareholders and that is in direct conflict with the single focused mission of air travel security for Americans.”
At a House hearing earlier this month, TSA Administrator John Pistole rejected an assertion by Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Ala.), chairman of the Homeland Security transportation subcommittee, that TSA “could reduce its ranks by 30 percent to 40 percent and still be able to do the job just as effectively.”
Said Pistole: “No, I don’t agree with that. That’s a huge number.”
TSA said the Orlando plan for private screeners will not become final until the agency approves “a proposal that does ‘not compromise security or detrimentally affect the cost-efficiency or the effectiveness of the screening of passengers or property at the airport.’  There will be no immediate change to operations or the federal workforce” at the airport.
federaldiary@washpost.com