Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Showing posts with label spying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spying. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

Operation "Monopoly", The American attempt to spy on the Soviet Embassy.

 I am still using my "old" laptop,   I haven't  ordered the new one yet, I need to, but just pulling the trigger and spending the money that I really don't want to. Does that makes sense?   Also My Dads Memorial service is tomorrow, so I may not be back online tomorrow, depends on how I feel.  I will be glad for the closure if nothing else.  My brother came back from Astan so we were able to plan the memorial service.

      I remembered when the Soviets got this primo real estate compliments of the Carter State Dept and people were really pissed especially after the Russians had bugged and infiltrated our embassy so effectively and made us look like chumps.

 


 

The U.S. and U.S.S.R. were no strangers to spying on each other, as they had been playing a cat-and-mouse game of espionage since the beginning of the Cold War. Operation Monopoly, where the U.S. tried to literally undermine the Soviet embassy, was one of the more audacious attempts on the American side.

Since the 1920s, the Soviets had spies integrated in many facets of the U.S. military and politics. WWII was a particularly busy time for Soviet intelligence agencies, as they were under direct orders from Moscow to gather as much information as possible on U.S. and British war plans, as well as any advances they were making in technology.

In fact, Soviet spies were embedded so deep that they were aware of the U.S.’ most secretive plans, like the Manhattan Project, leading to the Soviet development of the atomic bomb, and sparking the Cold War

 

This continued after WWII, but the two superpowers were now capable of mutual destruction, forcing them to use more inventive ways to get the upper hand over each other. One of the most critical points of attention was their embassies. This was a place where important and top secret conversations were made by the enemy on their own soil. Naturally, eavesdropping on embassies became a priority for both the Soviets and the U.S.

A replica of a bugged US great seal on display at the National Cryptologic Museum in 2005 

A replica of a bugged U.S. great seal on display at the National Cryptologic Museum in 2005

One of the earliest known forms of this was “The Thing” in 1945. The Thing was a listening device planted within a wooden plaque of the Great Seal of the U.S., which was given to the American ambassador at the time by the Soviet Union, as a gesture of the friendship the nations established during WWII. The ambassador hung it on the wall of his office, not knowing it was secretly listening. The device was remotely powered by electromagnetic energy from an outside source to keep it hidden.

It was accidentally discovered six years later in 1951 by a radio operator in the British embassy.

In 1964, the U.S. discovered 40 bugs in their embassy, and in 1984, they realized their typewriters were secretly transmitting what they typed to the Soviets.

In the 1970s, the Soviets were planning to build themselves a new embassy in Washington, on a plot of land selected by the State Department. Much to the dismay of U.S. intelligence services like the FBI, CIA, and NSA, the land chosen for them was on the second-highest point in Washington, giving the Soviet embassy a prime location to spy on the White House.

Knowing this, U.S. secret services planned to bug the new embassy from top to bottom to listen for important information and to detect if the Soviets were spying on them.

Before Soviet architects arrived, the FBI ordered the trees around the construction site to but cut down and any evidence like sawdust and tree stumps removed. This was to provide an unobstructed view of the location. Next, the FBI secretly purchased a three-bedroom house situated quite literally across the road so they could observe the embassy around the clock.

Russian Embassy in Washington                                           Russian Embassy in Washington

 

However, the main event was Operation Monopoly, a plan to dig a tunnel straight under the Soviet embassy. This tunnel would allow U.S. intelligence services to tap into and listen to Soviet communications and calls.

The FBI selected a contractor, and work began while the embassy was under construction. The FBI had to exercise extreme caution to keep the tunnel a secret, by carefully removing dirt, and adding high-tech monitoring equipment as they went.

Where did the tunnel begin? This is still a matter of debate, with many people claiming to know, suggesting it’s in places like the FBI-owned house across the road, while others believe it begins in an even closer house on Fulton Street. A local espionage enthusiast has monitored this house for years and has never seen anyone come or go, even during holidays like Halloween.

The workers involved in Operation Monopoly had to work tirelessly to keep a constant ingress of water out. As well, despite having detailed plans of the embassy’s layout, they were not sure where the tunnel was in relation to the building.

The Soviets were highly experienced at counter-espionage, having perfected it over the previous decades. This made it incredibly hard for the Americans to successfully spy on the embassy. The Soviets used thick slabs of marble on the walls instead of a conventional marble-epoxy-marble method, to prevent bugs from being placed in the glue.

They also would check every window frame and sheet of metal for bugs before they were placed in the building. On top of this, they bored 30–40 feet deep holes around the site to check for tunnels.

Robert Hanssen is believed to have compromised Operation monopoly 

Photo double agent Robert Hanssen, who started working for the FBI and then defected to the KGB while pretending to work for the FBI

The embassy’s construction-to-use lasted from 1977 to 1994, and in this time, the U.S.’s repeated and extremely expensive attempts to tunnel under and monitor the embassy had failed. Thanks to this obvious lack of success, they suspected there may have been a traitor in the project in the early 1990s, and began an investigation.

It was discovered in 2001 that there was indeed a rat in the ranks, an FBI agent named Robert Hanssen, who was sending top secret information to the Soviets in exchange for money.

He revealed U.S. double agents to the KGB, some of whom were eventually executed, and also revealed the plans about the multi-million dollar and decades-long tunnel project under the Soviet embassy.


 

 Hanssen had revealed the existence of the tunnel in 1989, long before 1994 when the embassy was fully occupied, meaning the Soviets were never at serious risk of having important information secretly recorded. This also means the U.S. continued tunneling for years without knowing the plan was exposed, making it a complete waste of time and resources

When the tunnel “officially” became known to the public in 2001, the Russian government pretended to be shocked about the incident, which was something they had actually known about for over 10 years.

Operation Monopoly was clearly a complete failure, and it shows the extent of the lack of trust between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. during the Cold War, and how that distrust continued long after the supposed “end” of the Cold War in the early 1990s, with the collapse of the Berlin Wall. As a result, somewhere in Washington, an underground tunnel with an unknown beginning or end still sits there today

 

Friday, January 22, 2021

The Left is Ramping up Their Stasi 2.0

 I Know quite a bit about the  STASI The East German Ministry of State Security that basically 1 out of 7 "Osters" spied on their neighbors, some willingly, most unwillingly because they got scarfed up in other "security" dragnets and were forced to spy on their neighbors or go to the East German Version of a "Gulag" or you would just "Vanish".  The KGB were not as efficient as the East Germans were in setting up a police state, I guess something was said for Teutonic efficiency.   But Apparently there is a movement out there for people to start "snitching" on their neighbors, I am sure that there will be a central number they can call for extra EBT credits or help in paying down their student loan debt for snitching on their neighbors especially if it bears fruit.  I can see what this will do to the National Trust, you won't know if your kids will squeal on you or if your niece, nephew , your kids who has been indoctrinated by that university that now believes that all conservatives are "Evil" and must be purged and their belongings seized for redistributions for "Reparation's" or something along that line.  You think I am bullshitting?  I remember in the 1930's that the Red Pioneers and the Little Octobrist would spy on their parents and the kids would report to the local commisar if the parents had any religious items in the house or anything relating to the Rominov's so the parents could be denounced in front of the Kolkhoz  and the items would be smashed and the parents would have to apologize to the community for betrayal of the new communist ideals and the kids would stand proud watching their parents being humiliated because to the children were already being taught, that the state was mother, the state was father and the state was all powerful.  This is the endgame for the Modern leftist if they get their way.  Unfortunately for them, a lot of us know our history but unfortunately there isn't as many as before and the history that I know isn't being taught anymore.  This stuff I have taught on my own as my background on the Soviet Union to know how they fight and how they think.  That was how I was an effective analyst for my job.  I would go farther into the books and the knowledge than was normal for my rank.  The Running joke was to really understand the culture was to understand Shakespeare in Russian.  I still speak German after all these years and I still know some Russian, and I play hell with the phone scammers ;)  You gotta amuse yourself somehow.

   I saw this on Breitbart and it gave me the chills of my time in Germany when I was attached to Berlin and I saw how the Stasi played in the 1980's and thinking that this was coming to the United States. 


#TrumpsNewArmy
Twitter/@donwinslow
8:59

Many on the left are promoting a recent video created by novelist and left-wing activist Don Winslow, which calls upon citizens to become cyber detectives to monitor and report fellow citizen Trump supporters to authorities while comparing the work of this “army of citizens” to that which led to the capture of al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden.

“On January 20, Donald Trump will become the Commander-in-Chief of a different army,” the slightly over two-minute clip begins. The words “This army” are then displayed as Trump supporters in Washington, DC, flash on the screen.

The threat addressed is described as emanating from “radical” conservatives who live among us. The clip continues:

The greatest threat facing America today comes from within: radical extreme conservatives, also known as domestic terrorists. They’re hidden among us, disguised behind regular jobs. They are your children’s teachers. They work at supermarkets, malls, doctor’s offices, and many are police officers and soldiers.

The video, which has received over 3.5 million views since, then claims that the president will begin a civil war once out of office and that ordinary citizens must “fight back.”

“In the years ahead, Trump will lead his army of domestic terrorists. He will encourage and incite violence,” the clip states. “He will start a civil war.”

“We have to fight back,” the clip continues. “In this new war, the battlefield has changes. Computers can be more valuable than guns. And this is what we need now more than ever: an army of citizen detectives.”

The narrator then reiterates the clip’s bold call.

“I’m proposing we form a citizen army,” he says. “Our weapons will be computers and cell phones. We who are monitoring extremists on the internet and reporting their findings to authorities.”

Outrageously, the clip then compares this “army of citizens” against Trump supporters to the monitoring and discovery of arch-terrorist Osama bin Laden.

“Remember, before the Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden he had to be found,” the clip continues. “He was found by a CIA analyst working on a computer thousands of miles away.”

Concluding with a call to action, the clip calls upon viewers to understand that the success of this “army” is in their hands.

“It’s up to you,” the video concludes, adding the hashtag “#TrumpsNewArmy.”

The hashtag has seen tens of thousands of tweets since.

Winslow, the producer of the clip, is a bestselling author of nearly two dozen crime and mystery novels as well as a screenwriter and has been the recipient of many prestigious awards.

His thriller The Death and Life of Bobby Z (1997) was turned into a film starring Paul Walker and Laurence Fishburne. Winslow also wrote the adaptation of Savages into a film of the same name, with Oliver Stone directing.

He has been a continual critic of the Trump administration.

In October, Winslow produced a Joe Biden campaign ad narrated by left-wing actor Jeff Daniels which took aim at President Trump in an effort to flip Michigan blue.

Winslow added several messages when publicizing the new clip, clarifying just how far he seeks to go.

Winslow called for a “citizen army patrolling the Internet” ready to expose, identify, notify law enforcement and notify employers.

“I’m calling for an AN ARMY OF CITIZEN DETECTIVES to FIGHT #TrumpsNewArmy of white supremacy. Will you help? Will you spread word?” he wrote.

“This video is a CALL TO ACTION,” he reiterates.

“No one in #TrumpsNewArmy should be given a pass,” he wrote in one tweet while clarifying in another that members of “Trump’s New Army” include Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Josh Hawley and GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert.

Many on the left have already begun promoting the clip and encouraging viewers to sign on.

“America or Trump,” wrote Pulitzer Prize-winning senior art critic and New York Magazine columnist Jerry Saltz. “An army of citizens prepared to root out and arrest #TrumpsNewArmy in their new cause of Civil War and Right Wing Domestic Terrorism.”

“How many domestic terrorists will T**** inspire to violence against Americans in the next year?” asked Miami-based Huffington post columnist Grant Stern. “Probably a lot. #TrumpsNewArmy.”

“ARREST EVERY TRAITOR,” wrote former Congressional candidate from Florida Dr. Dena Grayson.

“Spread. This. Everywhere,” wrote liberal radio host Chip Franklin.

“The domestic terrorists are standing back (again) and standing by (again),” wrote Emmy-winning marketing director Ryan Bell. “#TrumpsNewArmy will continue to be a danger to our nation after he is no longer president.”

“Another powerful and poignant video from @donwinslow America it’s up to us!” wrote Author/activist and Huffington Post contributor Ariaa Jaeger. “If you want democracy participate in ensuring it succeeds! Please RT.”

“Spread #TrumpsNewArmy by @donwinslow far and wide,” wrote former Editor-In-Chief and co-founder of Hill Reporter James Kosur.
“What happens to #Cult45 when their Dear Leader blows them off to focus on his prosecution in New York?” asked Hill Reporter contributing writer Tara Dublin. “#TrumpsNewArmy is a #DipshitMilitia of losers who thought their whiteness would protect them, and NOPE #MAGAIsOver.”

“It is up to ALL OF US, in this together,” wrote filmmaker Adam Rifkin.

Faux conservative anti-Trump Lincoln Project senior adviser for veterans affairs Fred Wellman called to turn in the “insurrectionists and racists.”

“Don is right. It’s up to us,” wrote Wellman.

“Do you love this country? Fight for it,” he added. “We can’t let these insurrectionists and racists take it from us. Turn them in. Fight for our democracy. #TrumpsNewArmy”

Anti-Trump activist Majid M. Padellan (a.k.a Brooklyn Dad Defiant), with a Twitter following of over 840 thousand, was among the strongest supporters of the initiative.

“#TrumpsNewArmy is VILE. And we KNOW who they are,” he wrote. “They are our teachers. They are our neighbors. They are our police officers. They are EVERYWHERE. EXPOSE THEIR TREASON.”

“[Trump’s] ‘army’ is still here, hiding amongst us,” he added. “They are traitors. They are evil. And they MUST be rooted OUT.”

Referencing the September 11 terror attacks, Padellan reiterated the need to “expose” the “terrorists.”

“After 9/11, we were told: ‘If you see something, say something,’” he wrote. “We have TERRORISTS in our midst. Some of us KNOW these people. It is our patriotic DUTY to expose them. Save a life. Say something. Expose #TrumpsNewArmy.”

“Spread this new gem by @donwinslow far and wide,” wrote ReallyAmerican.com, a Super PAC “dedicated to defending Truth, Democracy, Social Justice, and Environment” and fighting “to End the Nightmare of the Trump Presidency and right-wing rule.”

But not everyone commended the clip’s message.

“This video is diabolical, painting millions of citizens, not only as disloyal to the nation–but as literal terrorists–as it attempts to draft the rest into fighting their neighbors in a civil war the filmmakers clearly desire,” wrote podcaster Bret Weinstein.

“I stand with all patriots against this madness,” he added.

“You are delusional,” replied DJ Brian Dawe. “Once again… your blanket stereotyping of all Trump supporters and conservatives in general is some Hitler vs the Jew shit.”

“You should be at least temporality disabled by Twitter for inciting violence, but there is a clear double standard on this platform,” he added.

“This is so dangerous it’s hard to sum up in a tweet,” responded producer and director Robby Starbuck. “It puts a target on the head of every conservative, calls for war and propagandizes to form a vigilante group that would narc on neighbors.”

“If Hitler or Stalin we’re alive today, they’d proudly use your video,” he added. “Sick and evil.”

“Hey, @jack @TwitterSafety… found actual incitement of violence in case you’re interested in enforcing your own rules at any point,” quipped Twitter user Eric Spencer.

The notion of associating Trump supporters with terrorism is not novel to Winslow’s initiative.

Last week, Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) stated during PBS’s impeachment coverage that President Trump had “radicalized” his supporters the same way the late terrorist leader Osama bin Laden had.

Thursday, July 11, 2013

The New APP for marking "Dangerous Gun Owners"

This is rich....Some company is making an APP where you can *narc* on your neighbor if you believe that he is a "Gun Nut".   Talking about doing the work for STASI the ATF,FBI,CIA,IRS,DHS,NSA and other alphabet federal and state agencies that want you to squeal on your neighbors.  Wonder if they will get extra food rations in the Obama economy for pimping out their neighbors.   Have a dispute with your neighbor, call the federal government and say that the person that you don't like is an "extremist" and pop a cold one, relax in the lawn chair and watch your neighbor's house get tossed, their dogs shot and if they are lucky, they will only be splayed out in their yard.  If they are unlucky, they will be on the way to the morgue because of the propensity of the local law enforcement to do a "hard knock" on people that they might have a problem with.  If I sound like I am bashing the police..I am not, I remember when "Police Officer" meant "Peace Officer".  Well that shows my age I guess.  I don't care for the militarization of the Police.  I see tragedy happening if this APP gets off the ground.  Even though the designers say that they have "safeguards" to prevent "abuse"...Yeah right.....You believe that?  Well I have some oceanfront property in Nebraska I will sell you.  You can watch the sun rise in the west sitting on your balcony while sipping some Starbucks.  Small bills, non-sequential numbers if you please.  I remember something during my research a while back on the Stasi the East German security police.  1 out of 7 "Osties" spied on their neighbors for either money, usually extra rations or privileges.  I can see the same thing happen here.  What happened to our freedom, people are willing to give up our birthright for some extra government cheese.




An App For ‘Marking Dangerous Gun Owners’ Ready For Abuse By Anti-Gun Crowd

July 10, 2013 by
Geo Gun Marker, a smartphone app created by Walkingtools, which describes itself as “a loose confederation of software and related art or education projects,” allows users to electronically log the locations of “potentially unsafe guns and gun owners.”
A description of the app, available at the Google Play store, reads as follows:
Geolocate Dangerous Guns and Owners with the Gun Geo Marker. Geolocation means marking dangerous sites on the App’s map so that you and others can be aware of the risks in your neighborhood.
The Gun Geo Marker operates very simply, letting parents and community members mark, or geolocate, sites associated with potentially unsafe guns and gun owners. These locations are typically the homes or businesses of suspected unsafe gun owners, but might also be public lands or other locations where guns are not handled safely, or situations where proper rights to own or use any particular type of firearm may not exist. Electronically marking these locations can help others in the area learn about their geography of risk from gun accidents or violence. No matter what your safety concern with firearms might be, you should feel free to use this tool to provide the most accurate information you can such that others can make their own safety decisions.
The app states that it is to be used to electronically log the location of only “potentially unsafe guns and gun owners”— but judging by the gun control proposals pushed by anti-gun zealots throughout the Nation over the past several months, it’s obvious that there is no way of knowing who classifies what as a dangerous gun or gun owner.
Never fear, the app makers offer some guidelines. 
Here’s who they say you shouldn’t mark:
  • Hunters or gun enthusiasts who safely store and properly enjoy their weapons in the field, or at local firing ranges for recreational purposes.
  • You should not be concerned merely because your neighbors are a member of any national gun advocacy organization. The actual threat – just to cite the best known org – that the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its kin present to you and your children is political.
  • Finally, there is at least one particular situation in which you should certainly not use the Walkingtools Gun Geo Marker. If you have direct, personal knowledge or even a suspicion that guns are being used in context of organized criminal activity, then it may be extremely risky for you to mark related locations. You should forget about the Walkingtools Gun Geo Marker in all such cases, and instead consider getting appropriate law enforcement agencies involved in the situation.
The last point is one that seems to negate the need for the app in the first place: if someone is using a gun in a dangerous (criminal) manner, call the police.
Here’s who the app makers want marked:
  • Note that while people who keep loaded firearms in their home should not necessarily have their location marked as a gun owner of concern, studies do show conclusively that guns in the home greatly increase the chances of death by gunfire for the owner, family members and visitors. This is especially the case with guns kept unlocked and loaded for “personal safety.”
  • First time gun owners or others who may not have not taken basic gun safety training, or who were not raised in a culture of gun safety, represent a real and present danger to their community, themselves and their family members. Their locations may be marked at any time. Bear in mind that these people are most often well meaning, thus as a concerned neighbor you might very well be able to educate them and therefore avoid marking their location.
  • A more obvious category of dangerous neighbor is someone who frequently displays or brandishes weapons, or those reveal their gun ownership status during normal conflict resolution. Such people are potentially a very serious concern, and the home or business locations of potential high conflict gun owners should be marked only when feasible. The same goes for any neighbor whose children speak frequently of their parent’s gun ownership, or who talk about guns as a potential tools for conflict resolution.
  • There are many locations, such as remote public or private lands where the discharge of firearms is legal. If you frequent such a location, you are likely a gun owner yourself and moreover, you probably have a strong interest in re-establishing safety standards at these sites.
And here are some options for marking gun threats in the app:
  • “Possible unlocked/loaded/unsafe storage”
  • “Possible insufficient training”
  • “Guns and unsupervised children”
  • “Guns and substance abuse”
  • “Possible medical related concern”
  • “Neighborhood talk, unsafe”
  • “Possible high conflict, armed neighbor”
  • “Possible out of place, large arsenal”
  • “Documented/frequent unlawful discharge”
  • “Possible illegal weapons on premises”
  • “Possible prohibited persons”
  • “Possible anti-government/terror threat”
  • “Other concern (describe)”
Perhaps a better—and less obviously made for and by people who dislike guns— version of the app would simply let people mark the locations of potentially dangerous people? Of course, an even better option would be for folks to mind their own business and focus on their own self-preservation and family protection without resorting to an app designed to spread gossip about gun owners.