"The Right To Be Left Alone"

 I got this post from a guy named Shane Vaughn on farcebook, I went ahead and read the caselaw mentioned in his story.  what it involved was the anti-abortion people being overzealous.  But now you have all these far left groups pushing their pet causes, BLM or no ICE, or what have you and they are doing the same thing.  This is something for us to remember if we get pushed into that situation, our first instinct is to..

   But the police and the courts might get pissy, so you use the courts to sue the crap out of the protestors, sure the lice ridden vermin don't have any money, but the NGO that sponsored the protest that disturbed you is flush with Soros or USAID cash...so you sic a shark of a lawyer on them with a contingency clause.    They like lawfare, use their playbook against them, they are the ones that started the dance, they are the ones that disturbed you with their bullhorns, whistles, signs and any property damage they caused.....just a thought.

Folks, let me teach you something today that your civics teacher never told you — and the courts hope you never find out or else their dockets will fill up with lawsuits.....

You have TWO rights that live in direct tension with each other. Both are real. Both are protected. And most Americans only know about one of them.

The first one everybody knows: the right to speak. The First Amendment. Say what you want. Protest. Preach. Picket. Knock on doors. Shout from the rooftops. America was built on it.

But here's the one nobody talks about.

The Supreme Court — in a case called Rowan v. Post Office back in 1970 — said this, and I want you to read it slowly:

"The right to be left alone is one of the most cherished rights known to man."

One of the most cherished rights known to man.

The Court didn't stop there. They said — and this is the part that should shake you — no one has the right to press even a good idea on an unwilling recipient.

Not a bad idea. Not a dangerous idea. A GOOD idea. If you don't want to hear it, you have the right not to be forced to.

Then came Frisby v. Schultz in 1988. The Court said targeted picketing — showing up at someone's home, their unavoidable space — can be restricted. Why? Because a captive audience has rights too. The Court called it the captive audience doctrine. If you cannot leave, you cannot be forced to receive.

And in Hill v. Colorado in 2000, the Court upheld buffer zones — spaces where people trying to enter a location cannot be cornered into confrontation. The reasoning? You should not have to abandon your right to be somewhere just to escape someone else's speech.

Now here is where Professor Toto connects the dots for you.

We live in an age where everybody thinks their right to speak trumps your right to be left alone. Social media mobs. Protesters at private homes. Activists who will follow you to your car. Ideologues who show up where they know you cannot leave.

They'll scream "First Amendment!" at you while violating your most cherished right — the right to simply be left alone.

The First Amendment protects your right to speak.

It does NOT give you the right to force your speech on someone who cannot escape it.

Most Americans do not know the difference.

Now you do.

And Now You Know... THE BEST of the Story.

Barrel is kinda Hot......

     To many in America, this might be a reality, we have decided if the time comes and the .gov colossus decides to finally implement the confiscation of firearms to further their goals of a "Utopia over the hill" if all the old nasty guns are gone and the government can act..."In our best interest" of course because "Our Betters" know what is best for us old nasty serfs.  This is feudalism and this was what ruled Europe during the middle ages, before the rise of the merchant class(read middle class) and the magna carta helped check the power of the royalty.  We as western based peoples have been raised to believe that the individual is sacrosanct, and that the government is to help you not rule you.  Now we have people in government that believe that they should be our rulers, the government is the master and the people are the servants
      This is anathema to a free people. The West is based on Greco-Roman principles of law and individuality , our system is built this way.  In other areas of the world, it matters what race, tribe,family you belong to, and you as an individual are subservient to that goal.   This ties in our individual right of self defense against tyranny,

   This is what happned when a western based society stripped the God-Given rights of self defense from their citizens all in the name of "Public safety".  the Gestapo was able to exterminate 6,000000000 Jews plus other "undesirables".  With no means of defending themselves people were

      I remember the Warsaw rebellion in history class, before they sanitized it for later generations, the German had crowded the Jews into the ghetto and were planning on killing them off because the Soviets were almost to Warsaw.  the Jewish residents of the ghetto had stolen rifles, made home made rifles and other weapons and when the SS came for them, they made a fight of it.  the Jews had nothing to lose, if they lost, they would go to Treblinka, Auschwitz and other places and exterminated.  They forced the Germans to fight for each house and blocks. the resources that the Germans had to expend against the ghetto was resources that they had to pull away from the Soviets.  Stalin showing his gratitude, stopped his armies outside of Warsaw and let the Jews fight, he wanted to make sure in the post German era, there would be no resistance to his plans to set up a puppet government in Poland answerable to the Kremlin.
     If they came for me, they would have a fight, I would rather die as a free man standing for my beliefs than die on my knees as a slave.  this is the difference between us and many others.  We believe in our God-Given rights and will not go into that long night quietly.