Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Showing posts with label mob rule. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mob rule. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

"ACME Voting" or the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

 

Another scheme to circumvent the U.S. Constitution...Color me shocked....THis is pure Mob rule, especially because the democrats like the illegals on the voter rolls


   Something like that......So Each state is responsible for policing its own rolls, but during covid there were a lot of shenanigans with mail in ballots and several battleground states including mine flipped, especially in a couple of counties around our state capital of Atlanta that always seems to have issues with voter integrity and it always seems to fall in the democrats favor...funny that.  So they are pushing for this voter compact because they don't believe that its "fair" that all these hick voters derail the urbal socialist paradise that is around the corner if only the "bitter Clingers" would get with the program and accept the urban technocrats as their "betters" because because of their education, and breeding they are better to rule decide what is best in everybody's interest....The university professors told them so.

   I clipped the following post off farcebook   The preceding cartoon came from my "stash"




The Acme Rocket Aimed at the Electoral College The Democrats have found another way to lose the argument and still reach for the trophy.
By Francis Gauthier
That is the plain truth behind the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. It is not some harmless civics reform dreamed up by clean-handed patriots sitting around a schoolhouse stove. It is a political shortcut. A back door. A way to keep the Electoral College standing in the front yard like an old New England barn while quietly gutting the beams from the inside.
And if New Hampshire is foolish enough to shrug at it, we may wake up one morning and discover that presidential candidates no longer need to care what a taxpayer in Claremont, Newport, Berlin, Colebrook, Franklin, or Laconia thinks.
They will care what Los Angeles thinks.
They will care what New York City thinks.
They will care what Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Houston, Seattle, and the big political machines think.
The rest of us? We can wave from the stone wall while the campaign bus rolls by on its way to a donor breakfast and a television studio.
That is the story. Everything else is wrapping paper.
The Democrats are the Wile E. Coyotes of politics. They no longer seem interested in winning elections the old-fashioned way — by persuading enough Americans across enough states that their ideas are worth trusting. Instead, they keep going back to the Acme catalog of political contraptions.
There is always another gadget in the crate.
“Push Grandma off a cliff.”
Russian collusion.
Laptop disinformation.
Cemetery voter outreach.
Mail-in balloting.
Election season instead of Election Day.
And now comes their latest shiny contraption: the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, or NPVIC.
They call it reform.
I call it the Constitutionally Illiterate and Unbelievably Naïve Conspiracy — CIUNC.
It even sounds like something hitting the bottom of a canyon.
The Trick in the Toolbox
The compact works like this: states that join agree to give all their presidential electors to whoever wins the national popular vote, even if that candidate loses inside their own state.
Read that again, slowly.
A state could vote one way, and its electors could be handed to the other candidate because voters somewhere else outnumbered them.
That is not local self-government. That is outsourcing your state’s voice to a national crowd.
The compact does not kick in until member states control 270 electoral votes — enough to decide the presidency. So it sits there like a loaded spring under the porch steps, waiting for enough states to step on it.
Supporters say this is perfectly fair. Every vote equal, every person heard, one national total, nice clean arithmetic.
But politics is not just arithmetic. Neither is a republic.
A republic is structure. Balance. Restraint. The Founders knew something modern political consultants work very hard to forget: raw majority power can crush smaller communities flat. That is why America was built as a union of states, not one giant national blob with fifty administrative regions and a federal logo slapped on top.
New Hampshire is not California with frost heaves.
Why New Hampshire Should Care
New Hampshire has always punched above its weight.
We are a small state, but we are not a small people. We expect presidential candidates to show up, stand in a town hall, look voters in the eye, and answer questions from people who know how to spot baloney without a federal inspection sticker.
That is part of our political culture.
The First-in-the-Nation primary matters because it puts ordinary citizens near the front of the process. A candidate cannot just hide behind television ads and consultants. He has to come here. He has to shake hands with mechanics, farmers, veterans, retirees, loggers, nurses, small-business owners, parents, and taxpayers who have already heard every polished speech since the Carter administration and are not impressed by another one.
The Electoral College carries some of that same spirit into the general election.
It tells candidates: you cannot win by piling up votes in a few crowded places and ignoring the rest of the country. You have to build a coalition across states. You have to care about regions. You have to know that a voter in rural New Hampshire still counts for something.
The NPVIC changes that bargain.
It says: forget the states. Chase the national pile.
Once that happens, New Hampshire becomes campaign scenery. Nice mountains. Good diners. Fine maple syrup. Thanks for the memories.
Then the big money goes where the population is thickest. The television buys go where the biggest returns are. The national machines run the table. The rural taxpayer gets a postcard, a robocall, and maybe a candidate’s cousin pretending to have once driven through Concord.
A Back Door Around the Constitution
Here is the part that ought to bother every citizen who still owns a pocket Constitution, even if it is buried in the junk drawer under dead batteries and a 2009 tax bill.
If you want to abolish the Electoral College, there is an honest way to do it.
Pass a constitutional amendment.
That means broad national debate. Congress. The states. Public consent. Heavy lifting. The kind of lifting politicians avoid like wet firewood.
The compact does not do that.
It leaves the Electoral College standing on paper while changing how enough states use it to make it meaningless. It is not demolition with a permit. It is sneaking in at midnight with a sawzall.
That is why this scheme feels so slippery. It does not openly say, “We are abolishing the Electoral College.” It says, “No, no, the Electoral College is still there. We are simply agreeing to hand our electors to the winner of a national vote total.”
Well, that is like saying you still own your truck after someone removes the engine, tires, doors, and steering wheel.
Technically true, maybe. Useful? Not unless you need a planter.
Why the Left Really Hates the Electoral College
Let us not overcomplicate this.
The left hates the Electoral College because it sometimes stops them.
That is the root of the whole business.
When Democrats win under the rules, the rules are holy. When Republicans win under the same rules, suddenly the system is broken, racist, outdated, undemocratic, and probably causing bad weather.
They did not like 2000. They did not like 2016. So instead of asking why their message failed in enough states to matter, they blamed the scoreboard.
That is the modern left’s oldest habit: if an institution blocks the agenda, delegitimize the institution.
If the court rules against them, pack it.
If the Senate slows them down, abolish the filibuster.
If voters resist them, federalize elections.
If parents object, call them extremists.
If the Electoral College produces the “wrong” winner, gut it through an interstate compact and call it democracy.
The Acme catalog never closes.
The Old Yankee Smell Test
New Hampshire people understand the smell test.
If a fellow shows up at your door with a clipboard, a grin, and a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,” you count your chickens before he leaves the driveway.
The National Popular Vote Compact does not pass that test.
It asks small states to surrender their leverage in exchange for a national promise. And anyone who has watched politics for more than fifteen minutes knows what national promises are worth once power changes hands.
Small states should never voluntarily give up constitutional protection. That is like selling your snowblower in July because the weather looks fine.
Winter comes.
Power concentrates.
The same people who tell New Hampshire, “Trust us, every vote will count,” will be the first to forget we exist when the campaign maps get redrawn around giant population centers.
The Electoral College forces presidential candidates to think about the country as a country — not just as a spreadsheet of high-density vote banks.
That matters.
It matters to the taxpayer.
It matters to the farmer.
It matters to the small-town business owner.
It matters to the parent who wants schools controlled locally, not by national political machines.
It matters to the veteran who did not serve a republic just so it could be managed by consultants with soft hands and hard drives.
The Roadrunner Keeps Running
In the cartoons, Wile E. Coyote always thinks the next gadget will work.
The rocket skates.
The giant slingshot.
The painted tunnel.
The exploding tennis ball.
The problem is never the plan, according to him. It is always bad luck, bad timing, or that smug bird.
Politics works the same way with the Democrats.
When their ideas fail to persuade enough Americans across enough states, they do not slow down and reconsider. They order another gadget. They build another scheme. They rename it “reform.” Then they act shocked when half the country sees the dynamite label on the box.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is just another Acme rocket.
And New Hampshire should not help light the fuse.
Bottom Line
The NPVIC is not about fairness. It is about power.
It would weaken small states, flatten local political culture, and turn presidential elections into national population contests dominated by big cities and political machines.
It keeps the Electoral College in name while trying to drain it of purpose. That is not reform. That is constitutional taxidermy.
New Hampshire should reject it cold.
Because once small states hand away their voice, they will not get it back with a polite letter and a stern town meeting speech.
They will have to fight for it.
Better to keep the voice now.
Better to guard the old constitutional fence before the cattle get out.
Better to tell the Acme salesman to take his rocket skates, his painted tunnel, and his national popular vote scheme back down the road.
New Hampshire still matters.
Let us keep it that way. 🗽
Biblical tie-in: Fair rules matter because honest government depends on honest weights. “A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.” — Proverbs 11:1. A people who let politicians rig the scale should not be surprised when liberty gets shortchanged.

Friday, November 21, 2014

The Anger continues.......


  Many people are awaiting the Ferguson Grand Jury deliberations and they have planned a huge response nationwide, there are protest planned in various cities:




  • Albany, NY                        
  • Carbondale, IL
  • Chapel Hill, NC
  • Chattanooga, TN
  • Chicago, IL
  • Cleveland, OH
  • Columbia, MO
  • Columbus, OH
  • Dallas, TX
  • Denver, CO
  • Des Moines, IA




  • Albuquerque, NM
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Austin, TX
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Bangor, ME
  • Beavercreek, OH
  • Blacksburg, VA
  • Boston, MA
  • Buffalo, NY





  • Detroit, MI
  • Durham, NC
  • Ferguson, MO
  • Gainesville, FL
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • Greensboro, NC
  • Greenville, NC
  • Grinnell, IA
  • Houston, TX
  • Indianapolis, IN
  • Iowa City, IA
  • Jackson, MI
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Kennesaw, GA
  • Lawrence, KS
  • Lexington, KY
  • Longview, TX
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Louisville, KY
  • Meadville, PA
  • Memphis, TN
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Mobile, AL
  • Monpelier, VT
  • Monroeville, OH
  • Nashville, TN
  • New London, CT
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Newark, NJ
  • Northampton, MA
  • NYC, NY
  • Oak Ridge, TN
  • Oakland, CA
  • Olympia, WA
  • Oshkosh, WI
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Pittsburgh, PA
  • Portland, OR
  • Providence, RI
  • Raleigh, NC
  • Rochester, NY
  • Rocky Mount, NC
  • San Diego, CA
  • Santa Barbara, CA
  • Seattle, WA
  • South Hadley, MA
  • Spring Valley, NY
  • Springfield, MA
  • St. Paul, MN
  • St. Petersburg, FL
  • Stroudsberg, PA
  • Tallahassee, FL
  • Tampa, FL
  • Toledo, OH
  • Toronto, Canada
  • Tucson, AZ
  • Washington, D.C.
  • West Hartford, CT
  • West Palm Beach, FL
  • Williamsburg, VA
  • Worcester, MA

  •     This is being co-opted by a bunch of groups that have a social axe to grind, or it serves a purpose,  From what I have read on verious news agencies, the Ferguson protest is being driven by outside agitators.   You have the usual black race hustlers making an appearance, you also have the Holder Justice department or parts of FEDGOV coordinating activities relating to the protest.  You also have the "Social justice" activist making an appearance, one even got her car stolen,
        
       Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, November 18, 2014, 9:17 AM
    No Justice, No Peace!
    Elizabeth Vega is one of the Ferguson protest leaders. She protested at sports venues and attempted a banner drop. She co-led the St Louis Symphony interruption, was arrested at the pumpkin smashing, yelled at the St Louis Post Dispatch protest, and helped block traffic with her freakshow in Clayton yesterday.
    mike brown concert
    Mike Brown protesters from Ferguson disrupted the St. Louis Symphony in St. Louis City in October. (KRON)
    While yelling “F*ck the Police!” apparently her car got stolen.
    Do you think she’ll file a police report requesting they help her now?
    Elizabeth Vega: “So while debriefing after the action my car got stolen.”
    vega car
    Her tweets expressing anger that Nixon called a state of emergency in part due to the rising crime and criminal elements associated with the protests are interspersed with others decrying the car theft.
    vega tweets
    Perhaps she could stop encouraging others to break the law?
    You hang with looters, you get looted.

         Also making a appearance are the "occupy crowd" you know the ones that in 2012 squatted on various parcels of property and made a nuisance out of themselves.  Well the "Occupy" movement would have failed if it wasn't for the unions supporting them.  I remember reading of a SIEU vehicle dropping off supplies at  the Occupy sites....you know the SIEU...the government union.  the only union that actually increased in size since Obama got elected.  the ones that during the townhall meetings where Obamacare was hotly debated, the ones that brought in agitators to intimidate the locals that were pissed about the passage of Obamacare, from the backroom deals and sheer bribery used to push it through on a strictly partyline vote.
             So we have the occupy crowd, along with their union enablers making an appearance.  We also have the environmental movement making an appearance trying to tie in the thug shooting with "environmental Justice".  Even the LGBT lobby is making an appearance with this trying to link their agenda with the shooting of "the Saint of Swisher Sweet" by that Racist Sexist cop who is a symbol of the repressive patriarchal society that suppressed sexual identity.
         There is a tumblr website that is a focal point for the protest that is planned for 83 cities, this is much bigger than a regular smash and loot mob that normally forms up after the local blacks are outraged about a Police vs a thug shooting.
       

         
              
    Missouri's governor has now preemptively declared a 30-day state of emergency and called out the National Guard — and the grand jury hasn't even made its decision yet!
    Basically, it's on.
    Ferguson, however, is not the only city set to hold protests immediately following the Darren Wilson grand jury announcement.
    Actually, they aren't even being referred to as protests anymore. They are now being called "planned responses."
    A Tumblr page for something called the "Ferguson National Response Network" has posted a very organized list with graphics for each location (something which, if it's as scripted as the rest of this situation has been and continues to be, will be expertly timed with the holidays coming up).
        
    View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
    Community. We train. We protest.
    The organizers have also released a list of 19 "Proposed Rules of Engagement."
    Wow. Just wow. This is not your average civil disobedience. Martha Stewart has thrown less organized birthday parties than this. There are White House functions with less planning and training involved.
    Anyone else get the sense that this whole thing has been co-opted? Think about it.
    When you're mad about something that's wrong with the system, what do you do if you want to protest it? You pull out a black marker, get a poster board, call up your friends, maybe send out a few Tweets or Facebook messages, then you find a corner and start protesting.
    You don't get so angry with the system that you first a) write a proposed rules of engagement list, b) start fundraising campaigns, c) set up highly coordinated protests in 83 cities, d) coordinate mass informational meetings and finally e) hold direct action trainings then get ready to protest.
    What average, random person has the time and money to pull off all that off properly?
    Sure people have been protesting this for months now, but still. What monster has Ferguson now mutated into? Who is ultimately behind it, driving the agenda?
    Many of the people who showed up to protest in Ferguson from the beginning were coming from out of town. There were definite provocateurs among the crowds trying to incite violence.
    At this point, people are apparently quitting their jobs and flocking to Ferguson to devote all their time and energy to this.
         Who is paying for this?   I keep on thinking it is all the far leftist groups, probably based on billionaire leftist Soros fortune.  We also have the Obama white house having meetings with the protestors and telling them "to Stay the course"
       The flipside of this is that ammo and gun sales in the area have skyrocketed, the average citizen is stocking up in case of civil unrest.  Many people in other area's are also stocking up, this has the potential of exploding into major civil unrest and major blood spill.



    Actually, they aren’t even being referred to as protests anymore. They are now being called “planned responses.”
    A Tumblr page for something called the “Ferguson National Response Network” has posted a very organized list with graphics for each location (which must have taken a lot of time and effort) detailing these “planned responses” that have been scheduled for a total of 82 cities across the U.S. and one in Canada after the grand jury announces their decision (something which, if it’s as scripted as the rest of this situation has been and continues to be, will be expertly timed with the holidays coming up).
    Organizers are also holding something called “direct action trainings.”
    - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/not-just-ferguson-protests-scheduled-for-83-cities-direct-action-trainings-being-held-for-protesters_112014#sthash.p1MheSh4.dpuf
    Missouri’s governor has now preemptively declared a 30-day state of emergency and called out the National Guard — and the grand jury hasn’t even made it’s decision yet!
    Basically, it’s on.
    Ferguson, however, is not the only city set to hold protests immediately following the Darren Wilson grand jury announcement.
    Actually, they aren’t even being referred to as protests anymore. They are now being called “planned responses.”
    A Tumblr page for something called the “Ferguson National Response Network” has posted a very organized list with graphics for each location (which must have taken a lot of time and effort) detailing these “planned responses” that have been scheduled for a total of 82 cities across the U.S. and one in Canada after the grand jury announces their decision (something which, if it’s as scripted as the rest of this situation has been and continues to be, will be expertly timed with the holidays coming up).
    Organizers are also holding something called “direct action trainings.”
    fergusonproteststraining
    Here’s what that looks like:
    The organizers have also released a list of 19 “Proposed Rules of Engagement.”
    - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/not-just-ferguson-protests-scheduled-for-83-cities-direct-action-trainings-being-held-for-protesters_112014#sthash.p1MheSh4.dpuf
       I don't really know how this will play out, We also have the amnesty speil being pushed by the community organizer in chief, along with the Democrats killing the Keystone pipeline yesterday.  This shows a major powershift in democrat politics.  It showed the winners and losers, the winners were the "greens" and the loser were the labor unions.  It showed who has the power and money in the democratic party.  I wonder how the unions will come back from this.
    When I was a shop Steward at my last employer, I warned the leadership about hitching the union wagon exclusively to one party, rather go with the one that is in the best interest of the membership.  I knew that the greens in the democrats were gaining in power, I had commented that the democrat politicians viewed us as an ATM, they would go mutter platitudes about "worker rights" and we would give them money, then they would go to the environmental groups and really make things happen for them.  Now the unions are being bit hard for their lack of foresight,  they are paying for their lack of vision.

        
    Missouri’s governor has now preemptively declared a 30-day state of emergency and called out the National Guard — and the grand jury hasn’t even made it’s decision yet!
    Basically, it’s on.
    Ferguson, however, is not the only city set to hold protests immediately following the Darren Wilson grand jury announcement.
    Actually, they aren’t even being referred to as protests anymore. They are now being called “planned responses.”
    A Tumblr page for something called the “Ferguson National Response Network” has posted a very organized list with graphics for each location (which must have taken a lot of time and effort) detailing these “planned responses” that have been scheduled for a total of 82 cities across the U.S. and one in Canada after the grand jury announces their decision (something which, if it’s as scripted as the rest of this situation has been and continues to be, will be expertly timed with the holidays coming up).
    Organizers are also holding something called “direct action trainings.”
    fergusonproteststraining
    Here’s what that looks like:
    The organizers have also released a list of 19 “Proposed Rules of Engagement.”
    - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/not-just-ferguson-protests-scheduled-for-83-cities-direct-action-trainings-being-held-for-protesters_112014#sthash.p1MheSh4.dpuf



    Wednesday, September 25, 2013

    The Difference between "Republic and Democracy..."

    I saw this link while surfing the web,   I have stated many times to the people who think that this country is a "democracy"   It is not....The founding fathers viewed "democracy" as "mob rule"  and it was a very chaotic form of government.  We were not referred as a "democracy" until Woodrow Wilson, the father of the modern liberal/progressive movement.  The Republic is "rule of Law" vs the" Rule of the mob"   I always liked Democracy as 3 wolves and 1 sheep voting on dinner...Whereas "Republic"  the sheep are armed.


    Republic vs. Democracy

    Rule by Law vs. Rule by Majority


    Just after the completion and signing of the Constitution, in reply to a woman's inquiry as to the type of government the Founders had created, Benjamin Franklin said, "A Republic, if you can keep it."

    Not only have we failed to keep it, most don't even know what it is.

    A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution).   A democracy is direct government ruled by the majority (mob rule).   A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals while democracies are only concerned with group wants or needs (the public good). Lawmaking is a slow, deliberate process in our Constitutional Republic requiring approval from the House, Senate, Executive (President or Governor), The Supreme Court, and individual jurors (jury-nullification).   Lawmaking in our unlawful democracy occurs rapidly requiring approval from the whim of the majority as determined by polls and/or voter referendums.   Voter referendums allow legislators to blame bad law on the people.   A good example of democracy in action is a lynch mob.
    Democracies always self-destruct when the non-productive majority realizes that it can vote itself handouts from the productive minority by electing the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury.   To maintain their power, these candidates must adopt an ever-increasing tax and spend policy to satisfy the ever-increasing desires of the majority.   As taxes increase, incentive to produce decreases, causing many of the once productive to drop out and join the non-productive.   When there are no longer enough producers to fund the legitimate functions of government and the socialist programs, the democracy will collapse, always to be followed by a Dictatorship.
    Even though nearly every politician, teacher, journalist and citizen believes that our Founders created a democracy, it is absolutely not true.   The Founders knew full well the differences between a Republic and a Democracy.   They repeatedly and emphatically said that they had founded a Republic.
    Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state in this union a Republican form of government".... Conversely, the word Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution.   Madison warned us of the dangers of democracies with these words,
    "Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths...", "We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior.   It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787)
    "A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority.   There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men." Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)
    Our military training manuals used to contain the correct definitions of Democracy and Republic. The following comes from Training Manual No. 2000-25 published by the War Department, November 30, 1928.
    DEMOCRACY:
    • A government of the masses.
    • Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
    • Results in mobocracy.
    • Attitude toward property is communistic--negating property rights.
    • Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether is be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
    • Results in demogogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
    REPUBLIC:
    • Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
    • Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
    • A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
    • Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy.
    • Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
    • Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
    The manuals containing these definitions were ordered destroyed without explanation about the same time that President Franklin D. Roosevelt made private ownership of our lawful money (US Minted Gold Coins) illegal.   Shortly after the people turned in their $20 gold coins, the price was increased from $20 per ounce to $35 per ounce.   Almost overnight F.D.R., the most popular president this century (elected 4 times) looted almost half of this nation's wealth, while convincing the people that it was for their own good.   Many of F.D.R.'s policies were suggested by his right hand man, Harry Hopkins, who said,
    "Tax and Tax, Spend and Spend, Elect and Elect, because the people are too damn dumb to know the difference".