Politically incorrect thought and other musings....

I will have some irreverent comments.  I was going to post a thingie on Daffy Duck...But it will wait until tomorrow. 

    First off, I was paying attention to the Ferguson shooting and the subsequent riots thieving and looting in the name of the latest saint of ghettoness.  A couple of years ago, we had St Trayvon of Skittles, and the race based narrative.  This happened before the 2012 election...so the democrats used this to gin up their base to go vote.  Now it is a couple of years later and we have St Michael of swisher sweets to stir up the democrat base to get them to the poll.  If pattern follows. there will be another race based incident in 2016 to get the base riled up so they go to the polls.   
     Well we have this shooting in Ferguson Missouri and the local denizens are pissed....So pissed that they burned down stores and looted them in their own neighborhoods.  Many people have heard the narrative that it was a racist cop that shot that choirboy on the way to college.  never mind that less than an hour before, the saint in question strong armed a clerk as he walked out with a pack of swisher sweet cigars.   Can ruin the narrative you know....
     Now we have the professional race grievance industry descending on the location to "demand Justice for Michael Brown."    You know the same people that keep things stirred up to keep themselves in power and money.

   Gotta never let a crisis go to waste. I heard that they have set up a voter registration area right by the memorial to the latest black saint, Michael Brown. There was marijuana in his system so maybe we should call him St. Michael of Weed. The Democrats are worried about the midterms so they are out there riling up the natives trying to get them to flock to the polls. Wouldn’t it be nice to see this policy backfire with a white backlash due to the rioting and looting? What does looting have to do with this?

I have never seen race relations soo bad..When Americans trying to prove that they are not racist, elect the most incompetent president in modern history to prove that we are not racist.   We have the professional race hustlers including our Attorney General

going to the scene to instead of calming things down will actually stir things up.  There have been several autopsies and all show the same thing.  That he was shot 6 times and not from the back as originally alleged.   Also I have read on several web sites that outsiders are stirring things up for their own agenda so to keep fanning the racial fire so it keeps burning.

     I also will touch on another item....the militarization of the police.  I have posted several times as have others that are concerned with the goodies that the police is getting from the feds.   it is believed that the heavy presence of the police wearing "camo" and looking like the marines in Fallujah actually inflamed the situation.   The ham fisted tactics seemed to cause more problems.  Like I said, I believe that other groups from DHS to the black panthers and the other race based groups are using the riots to further their agenda. 
    I keep looking for the distraction from the media...what are they distracting us from?   IS it the failed foreign policy of the anointed one?  Is it the 6th year of the job less recovery due to the policies of the Jesus of the left?   is it the ruinious debt that we as a country are running up to support the spending habits of the establishment at D.C?   is it the war on the middle class that the democrats are waging despite their rhetoric to the contrary?  Look at the effects of Obunglercare and the taxation policies of the government?

     I don't have the answers for all of this but I do know that we have forgotten to be Americans.  We are soo polarized that there is no give anymore and I wonder if the next step is fire and that is what will take to burn out the hatred.

The Feds want the little people to feel the pain of the partial shutdown

I have seen stuff on the news where the state park people are putting up barriers to keep people lot of the open air parks, there is normally no barriers, but they are adding them during the shutdown...

That bothers me....These places are "open air" and somehow the government finds the time to "close" them and put barricades up because the petulant boy king is throwing a temper tantrum because he isn't getting his way and he and the democrats wants the " little people" to feel the pain.   Now these places don't have barriers up normally....regular access and all that....but all of a sudden, there are barriers up?   Wait a freaking minute...those clowns in DC work for US   not the other way around.   Now we also have places like "Grand Canyon and Rushmore offered to stay open through state money but the bureaucrats are saying "NO"  they have their orders from "dear Leader" to make the hoi polli feel the pain because their betters in DC want to put the screws to us because they want an open checkbook to spend money we don't have so they can buy votes to stay in power.  They say this is over "Obunglercare"   Obunglercare is a sideshow...Dear Leader wants the debt limit raised.....again, nothing like going from 9 trillion dollars in 2008 to 18 trillion in 2013....nothing like doubling the debt...but who cares...the grandkids will pay it off.....maybe...but it don't matter as long as they stay in power they can keep hopping from turd to turd to keep their benefits and privelages while the rest of us have a decreased standard of living because the dollar is worth less and less.

   

     The Obama administration has stopped white house tours to punish the little people so we cannot see " our house"   but they have all the lobbyist and other democrat donors still have unfettered access to the Obungler white house......And nobody is screaming about this because the lamestream media is covering for that hack and his cronies in the whitehouse....now if that had been an republican whitehouse.....they would have been screaming bloody murder and demanding investigations...but since it is " their guy" they cover for him.   objective news reporters...my ass.  They are totally in the tank for this corrupt administration.
   

Of course, he’s aided and abetted by the LSM which is nothing more than the propaganda wing of the Dimocrat Party. The so called “journalists” are really nothing more than highly paid stenographers who write down and then regurgitate the talking points fed to them by the White House and the Dimocrats in Congress. All you have to do is listen to what the Dimocrat leaders have to say. They use the same words and they all call the Republicans the same names. “Terrorists” “Anarchists” “Hostage takers” “Radicals” “Extremists” (So much for that “new tone” and “civility” we were lectured about after the Giffords shooting. As with all of the other stuff we’re lectured about by our betters, it only applies to Republicans, Libertarians, and the Tea Party.) The members of the LSM no longer report. They now propagandize. And then they have the unmitigated gall to claim they have no liberal bias. Goebbels would be proud. So would Lenin and Stalin.
    

And didja notice that Obeauzeau is willing to negotiate with our enemies, the Iranians, but is not willing to negotiate with Republicans. He and the rest of the Dimocrats are using names for Republicans that apply more to the Iranians and al Qaeda than to Republicans. They’re calling Republicans “terrorists”. In all of my years, I have never seen the Dimocrat Party like this. And they have the unmitigated gall to call conservatives “extremists”?
     Where is the outrage?   What is with  the unmitigated gall of the President...You noticed that he only uses bad words to describe his political opponents...not the muslims that want to kill us, not to anybody else that wants to hurt us....but just his political opponents....Like he only has a spine when he is talking to the GOP..He knows that the LSM will cover for him...whereas the world media has lost its shine for him several years ago and they will report things that we in the states will not get unless we read foreign newspapers not the domestic bird cage liners or fishwrappers we get locally.
    Now I don't know about other people but I am really pissed about this crap, those clowns work FOR US...We are not sheeple to provide wool and the occasional mutton to our betters in D.C and I am wondering how much longer people in the states will get to the point that they are pissed enough to tell the FEDs to screw off.

   

Islam..the state Religion....?

I have been hearing through various media outlets that the D.O.J   you know the organization that started "Fast and Furious", the failure to prosecute the black panthers in their intimidation of white voters in the city of brotherly love..., the same one that spied on journalist, lead the raid on Gibson Guitars, lessee...refused to enforce DOMA...I am sure that I forgot a few....  The same Eric Holder and the D.O.J has sent letters to Muslim groups and dispatched a top lawyer to reassure them that if people post what they consider inflammatory remarks against Islam that it would be a civil rights violation...Here are more details from Judicial Watch:

    
A top Department of Justice lawyer warns that posting offensive material on Islam will have legal repercussions.
Judicial Watch reported – via Ace:

In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S. the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights.
The move comes a few years after the administration became the first in history to dispatch a U.S. Attorney General to personally reassure Muslims that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is dedicated to protecting them. In the unprecedented event, Attorney General Eric Holder assured a San Francisco-based organization (Muslim Advocates) that urges members not to cooperate in federal terrorism investigations that the “us versus them” environment created by the U.S. government, law enforcement agents and fellow citizens is unacceptable and inconsistent with what America is all about.
“Muslims and Arab Americans have helped build and strengthen our nation,” Holder said after expressing that he is “grateful” to have Muslims as a partner in promoting tolerance, ensuring public safety and protecting civil rights. He also vowed to strengthen “crucial dialogue” between Muslim and Arab-American communities and law enforcement.
Evidently that was a precursor of sorts for an upcoming Tennessee event (“Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society”) that will feature the region’s top DOJ official, who serves as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, and an FBI representative. The goal is to increase awareness and understanding that American Muslims are not the terrorists some have made them out to be in social media and other circles, according to a local newspaper report. The June 4 powwow is sponsored by the American Muslim Advisory Council of Tennessee.
The area’s top federal prosecutor, Bill Killian, will address a topic that most Americans are likely unfamiliar with, even those well versed on the Constitution; that federal civil rights laws can actually be violated by those who post inflammatory documents aimed at Muslims on social media. “This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion,” Killian says in the local news story. “This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.”

     Now Let me get this straight...If I say that Islam is a 7th century religion and all I learned about Islam I learned when I saw the planes crash into the WTC on 9/11.  the D.O.J will come after me because I might offend a group of muslims....?    Really?....you got to be shitting me.....The same D.O.J that selectively prosecutes cases depending on the agenda out of the white house?   They will go after my 1st amendment rights....Lessee if I can find my 1st amendment rights real quick in my copy of the U.S. Constitution.:

     FIRST AMENDMENT:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

    Yep found it.   What part of the 1st amendment does the D.O.J not get...?   Where is the fucking ACLU?  those bastards protest at the drop of the hat when they feel that their first amendment is being trampled on...unless it is Obama and his minions doing it, then they are silent.  Where is the outrage of the left...they like to scream about their first amendment rights on a regular basis.  They are silent also.  They are so P.C. dominated that they are afraid to say anything for fear of being  labeled haters that they will bow down before this.
    As y'all can see from my language I have a real problem with this.    Let me give a refresher on the 1st amendment...it protects all speech...even the "Unpopular" ones....The government cannot curtail what I say, it is my right as an American citizen to say what I want and have no fear of getting shipped off to a gulag.     I see them trying to start a state religion...All other religions are at the same standard except Islam, it is held to a special category...why?   All the prople in D.C. are intent on protecting Islam....is it our new state religion and I didn't get the memo...oh wait...I will have the D.O.J drop in for a visit and tell me that I have to kiss Islams ass or I will find myself in jail for violating the civil rights of muslims...what my civil right not to have a state religion forced down my and other Americans throat.   What kind of crap is that....you have to be nice to Muslims....or else.    
    Yep be nice to muslims or they get offended and either blow themselves up along with a bunch of innocents people or they cut your head off.

Why are we being nice to these savages?   We are expected to be tolerant of their religious belief, but they are not tolerant of others.....You doubt me...Ask the Copts in Obama's Egypt.  They have churches burned on a regular basis and the same with other religions in places where Islam is dominant.  But nothing is said from the Obama white house now let people here in America make unkind comments about Islam in social media and they will put me in jail....?  well fuck them   this crap really pisses me off.  Also mentioned in the ist amendment...you know the one that the ACLU assholes like to preach about....there is a part where it states that  
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,   
      Well it looks like we have a state religion now.....They can insult Christianity on a regular basis and  it is OK, but insult the imams of Islam and there is hell to pay.   or they chop your head off...

    

                                              
                                    “WHEN THE ILL WINDS BLOW, I WILL ALWAYS
                                        STAND WITH THE MUSLIMS!”

Illegally crossing the Border....

As you know, Iran recently nabbed three American hikers who (they say) had strayed across their border.  So … let’s review the rules:

If you cross the North Korean border illegally you get 12 years hard labor.

If you cross the Iranian border illegally your are detained indefinitely.

If you cross the Afghan border illegally you will be shot.

If you cross the Saudi Arabian border illegally you will be jailed. 

If you cross the Chinese border illegally you may never be heard from again.

If you cross the Venezuelan border illegally you will be called a spy and your fate is sealed.

If you cross the Cuban border illegally you will be thrown into a political prison to rot.

If you cross the U.S. border illegally you get:

• A job.
• A driver’s license
• A Social Security card
• Welfare
• Food Stamps
• Credit Cards
• Subsidized Rent
• Subsidized home loans
• Free education
• Free health care
• Your very own lobbyist
• Billions of dollars worth of public documents printed in your language
• The right to carry your country’s flag while you protest that you don’t get enough respect.

As they say ….. WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT !

California wants to allow felons to vote..........democrat

Lemme get this straight, wacky california wants to allow felons to vote?   That is one of the things that a felon loses is the right to vote along with 2nd amendment rights.  Nothing like cheapening an election by allowing felons and from reading this they talk about the disproportional amount of "minority" people incarcerated.  This is the crux of the problem, this is assorted leftist groups trying to basically stuff the ballot boxes with potential democrat voters.    Talk about "cooking the books"

Case would let thousands of Calif. criminals vote

By DON THOMPSON | Associated Press – 4 hrs ago

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The nonpartisan League of Women Voters and two prisoners' rights groups sued California elections officials on Wednesday, claiming that tens of thousands of criminals being shifted to county jails and community supervision should be eligible to vote.

The state's new realignment law that took effect in October is sending lower-level offenders to county jails instead of to state prisons, where they are barred from voting. It also ends parole for many ex-convicts, substituting a similar program called "post-release community supervision" instead.

The plaintiffs said more than 85,000 offenders who are no longer in state prison or on parole should be allowed to vote in the June primary election.

They are challenging a memo from Secretary of State Debra Bowen's office that said people who are sentenced to county jail or supervision under realignment are ineligible to vote under California law.

California is one of 48 states and the District of Columbia that prohibit felons while they are incarcerated. The exceptions are Maine and Vermont.

According to The Sentencing Project, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy organization, 35 states ban parolees from voting and 30 of the same states bar voting by people on probation as well. California permits voting by those on probation who are overseen by county probation officers but prohibits it for those on parole who are supervised by state parole agents. Four states prohibit voting by ex-felons even after they are off parole, while eight others limit when ex-felons can vote.

Felons' voting rights are being debated in statehouses across the nation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

South Dakota lawmakers have sent the governor a bill to block voting by felons on probation or parole. However, legislators in New Jersey and New York are considering bills that would do the opposite by letting parolees and probationers vote.

Legislation pending in Tennessee would stop requiring that convicts pay their restitution, court costs and child support before they can vote again. But Washington state legislators are considering a bill that would add the same repayment obligations that Tennessee may end.

Some felons could vote absentee from their prison cells under bills introduced in Hawaii and Tennessee. A South Carolina bill would block registered sex offenders from voting at all. Lawmakers in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania could require state officials to help offenders register to vote as they complete their incarceration, probation or parole.

The lawsuit challenging California's practice was filed in the 1st District Court of Appeal in San Francisco against Bowen and John Arntz, director of elections in San Francisco. It asks the court to order elections officials to let citizens vote even if they are incarcerated or supervised at the county level.

The memo written by Bowen's chief legal counsel to county elections officials in December said it shouldn't matter that the lower-level offenders "serve their felony sentences in county jail instead of state prison or ... their release from prison is labeled something other than 'parole.'"

That conflicts with the plain language of the state Constitution and with a 2006 legal decision by the same appeals court, argued the plaintiffs. The Constitution prohibits voting only by those "imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony," neither of which is the case for lower-level criminals under the new law.

Bowen's office said that "imprisoned" is a broader term that can mean incarceration in a local jail as well as a state prison.

"These individuals are 'imprisoned for the conviction of a felony,' but they are not 'in prison for the conviction of a felony,' wrote chief counsel Lowell Finley in the 18-page memo. The memo also argued that parole and post-release community supervision "are functionally equivalent" under the law.

There is no evidence that lawmakers intended to let more criminals vote when they approved the realignment law to save the state money and ease crowding in state prisons, Finley wrote.

Bowen spokeswoman Shannan Velayas declined comment Wednesday, citing the pending lawsuit. However, Bowen reviewed the legal arguments before issuing the memo and "is prepared to litigate them if necessary," Deputy Attorney General Seth Goldstein wrote in a letter this week to the plaintiffs' main attorney. As the state's lawyer, the attorney general will defend Bowen's position.

The ruling disproportionately affects nonwhites because a higher percentage of racial minorities are incarcerated, said Jory Steele of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs.

The Sentencing Project, which acts as a nationwide clearinghouse on the issue, estimates that 5.3 million citizens nationwide have temporarily or permanently lost their right to vote because of a felony conviction. That number includes 1.4 million black males, or 13 percent of all black men, a rate seven times than the national average.

Supporters argued that letting the offenders vote should be part of their rehabilitation.

"It's also about taking responsibility and participating fully in the community," Santa Cruz County's Chief Probation Officer Scott McDonald said in a statement supporting the lawsuit.

Aside from the league, the other plaintiffs are the nonprofit Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and an affiliated voter-education program called All of Us or None, as well as Alisha Coleman. She is described as a 30-year-old woman who is serving time in San Francisco jail for a narcotics conviction but still wants to vote.

Justice Dept rejects S.C Votor law

Justice Dept. rejects South Carolina voter ID law, calling it discriminatory

BENJAMIN MYERS/REUTERS - Attorney General Eric Holder holds a news conference at the DOJ in Washington D.C. December 21, 2011. (REUTERS/Benjamin Myers)

The Obama administration entered the fierce national debate over voting rights, rejecting South Carolina’s new law requiring photo identification at the polls and saying it discriminated against minority voters.
Friday’s decision by the Justice Department could heighten political tensions over eight state voter ID statutes passed this year, which critics say could hurt turnout among minorities and others who helped elect President Obama in 2008. Conservatives and other supporters say the tighter laws are needed to combat voter fraud.

      Justice Department lawyers, facing intense pressure from civil rights groups to act against the new laws, are still reviewing Texas’s statute.
In its first decision on the laws, Justice’s Civil Rights Division said South Carolina’s statute is discriminatory because its registered minority voters are nearly 20 percent more likely than whites to lack a state-issued photo ID. Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, South Carolina is one of a number of states that are required to receive federal “pre-clearance” on voting changes to ensure that they don’t hurt minorities’ political power.
    Read more here

     I see this stuff coming from the Eric  Holder's"My People" Justice dept you know the justice dept that refused to prosecute the white voter intimidation, the same one that equal rights division don't believe in equal rights, only rights for "his people" and they are using the excuse that minority and others will be denied a vote.  What a croc of crap.  They say that having to provide State I.D. in order to vote is a hardship.  I bet they willingly provide the I.D to get the assorted benefits that they get.  But having to show I.D to vote is a hardship?  To protect the sanctity of the voting process having minorities provide I.D is a hardship?   I was really steamed but not surprised.  How much voter fraud is tied to the democrat party.  You know..the democrat party,  the vote early and vote often party. in 2008 elections, in Philadelphia they had more ballots cast for Obungler than they had registered voters.  The democratic party,   the party that invented gerrymandered. 

      This racial crap will never end, the continued reprisals against the sins of slavery that ended with the civil war 150 years ago.  We are being continually being punished for the sins of our forefathers.  My ancestors were dirt poor farmers in middle Georgia that never owned slaves, but they did fight in the war between the states because they believed that it was their duty against the invaders.  All this stuff is doing now is angering a new generation of whites and also creating a generation of professional victims that blame whitey for their failure to pursue the American dream.  This will continue while the professional race baiters keep playing the victim card.  It is their way to have power and maintain their relevance in the black community.  They tie their fortune to the democrap party, you know the party that destroyed the Black nuclear family in the name of the "great society" programs of LBJ in the 60's.  When will it end? the constant repercussions,  the hunt for payback.  All this does is create a cycle that will never end.

Caatholic University is accused of being mean to muslim students....

Am I missing something here.....?  lessee...a PRIVATE CATHOLIC University is being accused of violating the civil rights of wannabe suicide bombers muslim students that are attending a PRIVATE NOT PUBLIC CATHOLIC University?   Couple of questions:  Why are a bunch of "I die in the name of allah"  muslim students doing in a private catholic university and they want special rights.  I am sure if a Catholic or a Christian student went to a islamic school....besides the fact that they wouldn't let him/her in because of the infidel thing, a Catholic students would have to expect islamic or arabic influances with no expectation of Christian artifacts would be allowed or a study group because as all infidels know..that islam is over sensitive and everything is sacred and holy to the explode are us   islamic students.  I am highly irritated that we are expected to be tolerant of them and respect their culture and it is not reciprocated.    The double standards is galling.

The Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights confirmed that it is investigating allegations that Catholic University violated the human rights of Muslim students by not allowing them to form a Muslim student group and by not providing them rooms without Christian symbols for their daily prayers.
The investigation alleges that Muslim students “must perform their prayers surrounded by symbols of Catholicism – e.g., a wooden crucifix, paintings of Jesus, pictures of priests and theologians which many Muslim students find inappropriate.”
A spokesperson for the Office of Human Rights told Fox News they had received a 60-page complaint against the private university. The investigation, they said, could take as long a six months.
    
The complaint was filed by John Banzhaf, an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. Banzhaf has been involved in previous litigation against the school involving the same-sex residence halls. He also alleged in his complaint involving Muslim students that women at the university were being discriminated against. You can read more on those allegations by clicking here.
Banzhaf said some Muslim students were particularly offended because they had to meditate in the school’s chapels “and at the cathedral that looms over the entire campus – the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.”
“It shouldn’t be too difficult somewhere on the campus for the university to set aside a small room where Muslims can pray without having to stare up and be looked down upon by a cross of Jesus,” he told Fox News.
A spokesman for Catholic University released a statement to Fox News indicating they had not seen any legal filings — but would respond once they do.
“Our faithfulness to our Catholic tradition has also made us a welcome home to students of other religions,” said  Victor Nakas, associate vice president for public affairs. “No students have registered complaints about the exercise of their religions on our campus.”
In a 2010 interview with National Public Radio, university president John Garvey acknowledged that they don’t set aside prayer rooms for Muslim students.
“We make classrooms available, or our chapels are places where they can pray,” he told NPR. “We don’t offer Halal meat, although there are always meals that conform to Halal regulations, that allow students to do what they want.”
Banzhaf said that it is technically not illegal for Catholic University to refuse to provide rooms devoid of religious icons.

“It may not be illegal, but it suggests they are acting improperly and probably with malice,” he said. “They do have to pray five times a day, they have to look around for empty classrooms and to be sitting there trying to do Muslim prayers with a big cross looking down or a picture of Jesus or a picture of the Pope  is not very conductive to their religion.”
As for the creation of a Muslim student group, Banzhaf said the university has an association of Jewish students – so why not a Muslim group?
“I think they are entitled as a matter of law to be able to form a Muslim student association and to have the same privileges as associations,” he said. “I think that most of them would much prefer to have a place to pray – that they are not surrounded by various Catholic symbols – a place that is more conductive to their religious beliefs than being surrounded by pictures of Popes.”
Garvey, in his 2010 interview with NPR, addressed that issue.
“It’s just not something that we view as an activity that we want to sponsor because we’re a Catholic institution rather than Muslim,” he said.
Patrick Reilly, the president of the Cardinal Newman Society, an organization that promotes Catholic identity among Catholic schools, seemed stunned by the complaint.
“I don’t know what the attorney wants them to do – if he wants them to actually move the Basilica or if the Muslim students can find someplace where they don’t have to look at it,” he told Fox News.
Catholic University, he said, is a Catholic institution.
“One wouldn’t expect a Jewish institution to be responsible for providing liturgical opportunities for other faiths and I wouldn’t expect a Catholic institution to do that,” he said.
“This attorney is really turning civil rights on its head,” he said. “He’s using the law for his own discrimination against the Catholic institution and essentially saying Catholic University cannot operate according to Catholic principles.”


     Read all the bullshit here

Occupy Wall street......?

I have been watching these flakes occupying wallstreet for a few weeks with some bemusement.  To describe these people as moonbats and flakes is being charitable. I was reading this list of demands, and the first thing I though was" damm their parents have got to be proud"  And followed by " you have got to be shitting me".  This demands can only come from people that have spent their time in college with no exposure to the real world  I have thought about dissecting this demand by demand but this basically reads like a wet dream of the radical far left.  Now I am reading pundits equating this as the far left tea party?   The tea party is fiscal sanity and return to limited government.  The restoration of individual liberty.   This stuff being proposed is pure pie in the sky, unicorn piss and rainbows with no concept or grounding in reality.   What a pile of bullshit.

Proposed List Of Demands For Occupy Wall St Movement!

Posted 9 days ago by LloydJHart (Vineyard Haven, MA)

Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending "Freetrade" by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.
Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.
Demand four: Free college education.
Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.
Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.
Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America's nuclear power plants.
Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.
Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.
Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.
Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the "Books." World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the "Books." And I don't mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.
Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.
Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.
These demands will create so many jobs it will be completely impossible to fill them without an open borders policy.
Lloyd J Hart 508-687-9153


I got this stuff from here