Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Showing posts with label kulaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kulaks. Show all posts

Friday, January 11, 2019

musings...and thoughts....and musings...oh my


I have been very busy and I think of all these great post that I want to do while I am doing other stuff like working, sleeping, driving,and other items of living in real life and the eloquence of what I will write, so I am excited so when I get in front of the laptop, my muse deserts me like the morals of a democratic politician...and I look at a blank screen going "well....crap...".


      I have noticed that the government shutdown has entered the 3rd week, we are eating unsafe food, breathing unsafe air and drinking polluted water since our betters are not checking up on how things are going because they are at home not getting paid....well according to the media anyway...
    A couple of days ago, the President gave a speech on his case for the wall, and the media outlets almost didn't want it broadcasted,
 I noticed a few things, first off..the speech was short and to the point, it wasn't full of "I" and "Me" like the previous inhabitant of the White House who was verbose or as my friend Shelldude would say "Dude uses a bunch of $5.00 words".  But they allowed Chuck"Nothing get in the way of the Camera" Schumer and Petrified Pelosi to do a rebuttal of the Presidents statement..

To my knowledge this has never been done before, excluding "State of the Union" Speeches.  This shows the amount of animus that the media has for President Trump. They view themselves as the gatekeeper of knowledge and any information that goes against the "GroupHiveThink" or the latest  stuff whatever the ministry of Truth decrees as "Truth" to be disseminated to the "Dirt People"

      Schumer and Pelosi challenged the president in a sleight-of-hand deal to re-open the part of government that is closed and then continue the debate about a wall. That reminds me of the "deal" offered to President George H.W. Bush by then-Speaker Jim Wright (D-Texas). Wright said Congress would cut spending if Bush would OK a tax increase. Bush was blamed for the tax hike, never got the spending cuts and lost his re-election bid as Bill Clinton and the Democrats reminded everyone in 1992 and the term "Read my lips, No new taxes" by President Bush and the resulting political suicide because the President tried to compromise with the democrats.  The Flipside is that 2 years later, the GOP running on the genius of Newt Gingrich took the house for the first time in 40 years because of the miscues and overreach of the Democrats with "Hillarycare" and the "Assault Weapons ban 94".  The Democrats got creamed in the 1994 elections.   This is interesting, If President Trump caves, he is through for 2020, he will be a 1 term president like the first President Bush. President Trump will have challengers in his own party, even Romney would make a go at him.

    The Democrats are feeling exuberant, they think they have the hated "Cheeto man" on the ropes.  The entire agenda for the democrats can be summed up in Impeachment, illegal to legal immigrant, and they will lock up another monolithic voting block like the blacks and guaranteeing a voting majority and power to rule, no borders, medicare control for all, green energy, Tax"in the name of fairness" increases and of course gun control.

   And speaking of "Gun Control"   Dianne "Ban all guns except the ones used by her personal security detail and the government" Feinstein of course...the dirt people...well their purpose is to pay the taxes, get sheared and occasionally killed for mutton to support the cloud people as an example to the others that might step out of line.

  The purpose is to replace us with a malleable voting population that will do what they are told.  People from the central and south American countries are used to totalitarian governments and their criminals prey on the dirt people and the resulting cries for "help" against the criminal elements that are terrorizing them is used as an excuse to strip more of the "rights" in return for "security" and people that depend on the government for security will do what is "suggested" to keep the security and this will guarantee permanent power to the state and the democrats.
     This is the part of the dekulakization that I mentioned in a few earlier POST.  If they can replace us and they can decimate the middle class at the same time.  The middle class is the checks and balance on the totalitarianism of those that would wish themselves "King".  Like the Magna Carta, this curtails tyranny because the middle class has the knowledge, money and guns to defend themselves if it came from push to shove.  The poor people will do what they are told because they need the EBT and other subsidies to live and they will mortgage their souls to do so because they depend on .gov and those that depend on .gov WILL do what they are told.


      And reading more of the Gun control bill, this basically is going after all firearms that have use a magazine, have a fore grip, that is where you hold the front of the rifle and other features.  This is most of the camel to coin a phrase. Even my lever action rifle falls under this ban, the fore-grip part.  All rifles use a fore-grip and this will basically ban all rifles.  Pistols will be next.  Once we are disarmed, we are at the total mercy of the big government democrats, and have no say in the process of governance.  
  
   I am bouncing all over the place on this posting, and this posting kinda reflects that...

   On a slightly different note, the Schumer, Pelosi rebuttal has been Meme gold....I will add a couple of ones that I picked up...



There are many more on the internet...

     On a different note, The new highspeed range near my house reopened, but I saw a sign on the door that said "Law Enforcement/Retired Military only".This concerns me because we regular people would like a nice place to shoot.  Having a range that caters to "LawEnforcement/Retired Military only" screams of elitism and a good way to guarantee another range closure.....again.
      I will go talk to them and see if this policy is ironclad and if it ain't, I will take the Garand and the Henry to the range and really try to shoot them.

Saturday, January 5, 2019

The coming dekulakization of America.


I have blogged a few times about the liberals and elitist going after us "dirt people" because we represent the middle class and we have the means to keep them in check because we are not "beholden" to them for our existence.  The elitist or the wanna be ruling class believe that it is their destiny to rule over us dirt people because we don't have the education like they did or believe like they do because we are not "enlightened" like they are.  and socialism will work this time because they are the right people in history to finally get it right...


  I saw this on "GunFreeZone"
By the 18th century, Feudalism had effectively ended in Europe.  The very beginning of the industrial and agricultural revolution in England in the 1700's as well as the social and political changes that came from the Age of Enlightenment made Feudalism obsolete.
No so much in Russia.  Russia was always seemed to lag behind Europe in social and technological advancements and the majority of Russian agriculture workers were still serfs in the 1800's.
The first major reform in Russia was the Emancipation Reform of 1861, which officially ended serfdom under Tsar Alexander II.  Russian form workers were still not nearly as free as European farm workers, which led to unrest and an eventual peasants revolt, which was part of of the Russian Revolution in 1905.  That led to the Stolypin reforms which finally gave Russian peasants the ability to buy land, have private property rights, hire workers, and engage in some level of capitalism.
Some of the farmers who had been emancipated in 1861 were moderately successful at farming.  For the first time in Russian history, they were able to pass down their farms to their sons, who took advantage of the later reforms and  were able to amass a modest amount of wealth.  They may have owned a home that was more than a shack, had a small herd of cattle, owned a tractor, had a couple of hundred Rubles tucked away.
In 1929, this all fell apart.
The newly founded Soviet government decided that such successful farmers were an enemy of the people.  There were called Kulaks which means "tight fisted" as in stingy.  They were accused of hording the agricultural wealth of the Soviet people, and between 1929 and 1932, the process of dekulakiztion resulted in the the forcible relocation 1.8 million people and the deaths about 4 million.
I want this to really sink in.
A Russian farmer was essentially a slave in 1860, not much better off than a slave on an American plantation in the same year.  He owned nothing, and worked the land for his lord, being allowed to keep barely enough of the food he grew to feed himself.
That farmer was emancipated in 1861, and was allowed to own his land by a process of a 49 year debt bondage.  In 1906, the farmer's son could borrow money to buy more land on a mortgage, maybe buy a tractor, and if he worked really hard pay that off loan and actually own something of value.  If that farmer was really hard working and very lucky, he could have been successful enough to have a plot of land large enough to hire a few people to work for him and maybe have some equipment or a mill or creamery to lease to other farmers.
All of this took place in the 68 years from 1861 to 1929.  The kulaks Lenin called "bloodsuckers, vampires, plunderers of the people and profiteers, who fatten on famine" were barely a generation or two away from slavery.  The kulak shot in the head by a Soviet solider was most likely the grandson of an emancipated Serf.
So enter the 116th of the United States of America.
Congresswoman Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez wants to implement a lot of reforms.
A few social media ideas for public servants looking to build an audience:
- Endorse Single-Payer Medicare for All
- Hold Wall Street Accountable
- Make Min Wage = Living Wage
- Cancel Puerto Rican Debt
- End For-Profit Prisons & ICE Detention
- Fight for a #GreenNewDeal
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 2, 2019
The center of her proposed policy, one that is gaining traction with the Democrats is the Green New Deal.  She managed to get a select committee put together for it and they have released a draft proposal.
You can go through it, but it is both economically and technologically infeasible to the point of being impossible in any reasonable timeline.
One of the points her draft makes sounds exactly like what the Soviets promised, with a little environmentalism mixed in.
The Plan for a Green New Deal (and the draft legislation) shall recognize that a national, industrial, economic mobilization of this scope and scale is a historic opportunity to virtually eliminate poverty in the United States and to make prosperity, wealth and economic security available to everyone participating in the transformation. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Plan (and the draft legislation) shall:
[P]rovide all members of our society, across all regions and all communities, the opportunity, training and education to be a full and equal participant in the transition, including through a job guarantee program to assure a living wage job to every person who wants one;
She is also starting to talk about reparations, a subject that Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee is bringing back up again.  The Democrats have already announced their intentions to increase the taxes on some Americans to raise the wages for other Americans.
The Democrats are drawing lines through people's incomes to decided were morality lies.  They will tax the rich and those they decide who are undeserving of their money.
And it all sounds like the dekualization of America to me.
My great grandparents were mud farmers driven out of Poland by the Tsar and Prussia by the Kaiser.
Neither of my grandfathers has so much as a high school education.  Both were born during WWI and started working as soon as they could to help put bread on the table during the depression.  My maternal grandfather served on a Coast Guard ship as a cook, patrolling the eastern seaboard for U-Boats.  My paternal grandfather was drafted as an artillery forward observer.
After the war my maternal grandfather took his wartime earnings and bought a butcher shop in Philadelphia.  My paternal grandfather joined the New York Bagel Baker's Union started a bakery.
My mother was a nurse, my father was a lawyer.  I'm an engineer.
For all intents and purposes, I'm little more than two generations away from serfdom.
I'm not unique in that, that is normal for Americans.  I know people in Alabama, who are white and are only a couple of generations removed from being share croppers and subsistence farmers.
When you look at what the Democrats decide is an immoral level of wealth, it's the combined mid-career income of an engineer and a RN, or a CPA and a dental hygienist, or an MD and a stay-at-home mom.
A family takes a couple of generations to crawl out of the mud and amass enough wealth to buy a house, a couple of cars, go on vacation once a year, and to listen to the Democrats they are bloodsuckers, vampires, and plunderers of the people.
The socio-economic class in America that is made up of people who have gone to college to study something useful and are professionals who work for a living, are the new American Kulaks.  The make too much to be virtuous by Leftist standards but lack the wealth and power of the investment or inheritance class Leftist elite.
The Democrats sworn in yesterday and doing their first business today are promising pie in the sky and are going to pay for it on the backs Americas Kulaks.  The more things change, the more 2019 is looking like 1929.

Friday, June 1, 2018

"What I saw and learned in the Gulag system."

I have blogged a lot about the Kulaks as a description of the middle class, and as a warning of our political "betters" that believe that the middle class is a disruption of their attempts for political power.  Poor people that are dependent on the government for survival will do whatever they have to to keep themselves there including giving up their freedoms for the illusions of safety and security.
I was following a link and ran across the "What I learned in the Gulag system", and decided to add some information about the gulag system and some information about a couple of the more famous people in the system. Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov.   I have in the past had made comments as have many others during the time of the Obama administration about the modern day Gulags A.K.A "FEMA Camps", we have commented many times that we are on some .gov watchlist and we would be collected when the purges started and shipped off when the Obama Administration or the Clinton Administration Part II went after all the "Bitter Clingers".    This started as a history post and morphed into a Political warning post or was it vice versa..... 

The GULAG was an administration body that watched over the camps; eventually its name would be used for these camps retrospectively. After Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin was able to take control of the government, and began to form the gulag system. On June 27, 1929 the Politburo created a system of self-supporting camps that would eventually replace the existing prisons around the country. These prisons were meant to receive inmates that received a prison sentence that exceeded three years. Prisoners that had a shorter prison sentence than three years were to remain in the prison system that was still under the purview of the NKVD. The purpose of these new camps was to colonize the remote and inhospitable environments throughout the Soviet Union. These changes took place around the same time that Stalin started to institute collectivization and rapid industrial development. Collectivization resulted in a large scale purge of peasants and so-called Kulaks. The Kulaks were supposedly wealthy (comparatively to other Soviet peasants) and were considered to be capitalists by the state, and by extension enemies of socialism. By late 1929 Stalin started a program known as "dekulakization". Stalin demanded that the kulak class be completely wiped out. This resulted in the imprisonment and execution of Soviet peasants. The term "Kulak" would also become associated with anyone who opposed or even seem unsatisfied with the Soviet government. This resulted in 60,000 people being sent to the camps and another 154,000 exiled in a mere four months. This was only the beginning of the dekulakization process. In 1931 alone 1,803,392 people were exiled. Although these massive relocation processes were successful in getting a large potential free forced labor work force where they needed to be, that is about all it was successful at doing. The "special settlers", as the Soviet government referred to them, all lived on starvation level rations, and many people starved to death in the camps, and anyone who was healthy enough to escape tried to do just that. This resulted in the government having to give rations to a group of people they were getting hardly any use out of, and was just costing the Soviet government money. The Unified State Political Administration (OGPU) quickly realized the problem, and began to reform the dekulakization process. To help prevent the mass escapes the OGPU started to recruit people within the colony to help stop people who attempted to leave, and set up ambushes around known popular escape routes. The OGPU also attempted to raise the living conditions in these camps that would not encourage people to actively try and escape, and Kulaks were promised that they would regain their rights after five years. Even these revisions ultimately failed to resolve the problem, and the dekulakization process was a failure in providing the government with a steady forced labor force. These prisoners were also lucky to be in the gulag in the early 1930s. Prisoners were relatively well off compared to what the prisoners would have to go through in the final years of the gulag.



The Gulag (/ˈɡlæɡˌ -ɑːɡ/; Russian: ГУЛАГ, IPA: [ɡʊˈlak] (About this sound listen); acronym of Glavnoye Upravleniye Lagerej, "Main Camps' Administration" or "Chief Administration of [Corrective Labor] Camps") was the government agency in charge of the Soviet forced labor camp system that was created under Vladimir Lenin and reached its peak during Joseph Stalin's rule from the 1930s to the 1950s. The term is also commonly used in English language to refer to any forced-labor camp in the Soviet Union, including camps that existed in post-Stalin times. The camps housed a wide range of convicts, from petty criminals to political prisoners. Large numbers were convicted by simplified procedures, such as NKVD troikas and other instruments of extrajudicial punishment. The Gulag is recognized as a major instrument of political repression in the Soviet Union.
The agency's full name was the Main Administration of Corrective Labor Camps and Settlements (Glavnoye upravleniye ispravityelno-trudovykh lagerey i koloniy). It was administered first by the State Political Administration (GPU), later by the NKVD and in the final years by the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD). The Solovki prison camp, the first corrective labor camp constructed after the revolution, was established in 1918 and legalized by a decree "On the creation of the forced-labor camps" on April 15, 1919. The internment system grew rapidly, reaching a population of 100,000 in the 1920s. According to Nicolas Werth, author of The Black Book of Communism, the yearly mortality rate in the Soviet concentration camps strongly varied reaching 5% (1933) and 20% (1942–1943) while dropping considerably in the post-war years at about 1–3% per year at the beginning of the 1950s.


Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, who survived eight years of Gulag incarceration, gave the term its international repute with the publication of The Gulag Archipelago in 1973. The author likened the scattered camps to "a chain of islands" and as an eyewitness he described the Gulag as a system where people were worked to death. Some scholars support this view, though this claim is controversial, given that the vast majority of people who entered the Gulag came out alive, with the exception of the war years. Although one writer, citing pre-1991 materials, claims that most prisoners in the gulag were killed, Natalya Reshetovskaya, the wife of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, said in her memoirs that The Gulag Archipelago was based on "campfire folklore" as opposed to objective facts. Similarly, historian Stephen G. Wheatcroft asserts that it is essentially a "literary and political work". Numerous other accounts from survivors state otherwise and the Mitrokhin Archive claimed that these memoirs were part of a KGB campaign, orchestrated by Yuri Andropov in 1974, to discredit Solzhenitsyn.However, this archive itself has its veracity in doubt; among other, more practical issues, by the same token with which Vasili Mitrokhin claimed the Soviet government would obviously be interested in discrediting Solzhenitsyn, Western governments would have as much interest in lending him credence.
In March 1940, there were 53 Gulag camp directorates (colloquially referred to as simply "camps") and 423 labor colonies in the Soviet Union. Today's major industrial cities of the Russian Arctic, such as Norilsk, Vorkuta and Magadan, were originally camps built by prisoners and run by ex prisoners.


What I Saw and Learned in the Kolyma Camps
     Varlam Shalamov
1. The extraordinary fragility of human nature, of civilization. A human being would turn into a beast after three weeks of hard work, cold, starvation and beatings.
2. The cold was the principal means of corrupting the soul; in the Central Asian camps people must have held out longer — it was warmer there.
3. I learned that friendship and solidarity never arise in difficult, truly severe conditions — when life is at stake. Friendship arises in difficult but bearable conditions (in the hospital, but not in the mine).
4. I learned that spite is the last human emotion to survive. A starving man has only enough flesh to feel spite — he is indifferent to everything else.
5. I learned the difference between prison, which strengthens character, and work camps, which corrupt the human soul.
6. I learned that Stalin's «triumphs» were possible because he slew innocent people: had there been an organized movement, even one-tenth in number, but organized, it would have swept Stalin away in two days.
7. I learned that humans became human because they are physically stronger, tougher than any animal — no horse endures work in the Far North.
8. I saw that the only group that retained a bit of their humanity, despite the starvation and abuse, were the religious, the sectarians, almost all of them — and the majority of the priests.
9. The first ones to be corrupted, the most susceptible, are the party members and military men.
10. I saw what a forcible argument a simple slap could be for an intellectual.
11. That people distinguish between camp chiefs according to the power of their punches, to their enthusiasm for beatings.
12. A beating is almost irresistible as an argument («Method number three»).
13. I learned the truth about the preparations for the cryptic trials[1] from masters of the craft.
14. I learned why in prison you get political news (arrests, etc.) sooner than on the outside.
15. That prison (and camp) rumours[2] always turn out to be anything but slop.
16. I learned that one can live on spite alone.
17. I learned that one can live on indifference.
18. I learned why a man lives neither on hope — there are no hopes at all, nor on will — what will?, but only on the instinct of self-preservation, the same as a tree, a rock, an animal.
19. I'm proud that at the very beginning, back in 1937, I decided to never become a foreman if my decision could lead to another man's death, if my will would be forced to serve the authorities oppressing other people, prisoners like myself.
20. My body and spirit proved to be stronger in this great trial than I thought, and I am proud to have betrayed no one, to have sent no one to death nor to the camp, to have denounced no one.
21. I'm proud to have made no requests until 1955[3].
22. I saw the so called «Beria amnesty» there and then — it was something to see.
23. I saw that women are more honest and selfless than men — there was not a single husband at Kolyma who came after his wife. But wives did come; many did (Faina Rabinovitch, Krivoshey's wife)[4].
24. I saw the amazing northerner families (civilians, former prisoners) with their letters to their «lawful husbands and wives» etc.
25. I saw «the first Soviet Rockefellers», underground millionaires, and heard their confessions.
26. I saw the hard laborers, and also the large E and B contingents, the Berlag camp.
27. I learned that one can achieve a lot (a hospital, a work transfer), but at the risk of life — at the cost of a beating and the isolation cell cold.
28. I saw an isolation cell carved out in rock, and spent one night in it myself.
29. The lust for power, for unpunished murder is great — from big shots down to regular police operatives with rifles (Seroshapka[5] and his ilk).
30. I learned the unrestrained Russian lust to denounce, to complain.
31. I learned that world should be divided not into good and bad people but into cowards and non-cowards. 95% of cowards are capable of any meanness, lethal meanness, after light threatening.
32. I am convinced: the camp is a negative experience — entirely. If one spent but an hour there — it would be an hour of moral corruption. The camp has never given anything to anyone — and never could. Everyone, both prisoners and civilians, are corrupted by the camp.
33. In every region there was a work camp, there was one at every major construction site. Millions, tens of millions of prisoners.
34. Repressions touched not only the ruling elite but all levels of society — in every village, at every plant, in every family either relatives or friends were repressed.
35. I consider the best time of my life to be the months spent in the cell of Butyrki prison, where I managed to strengthen the spirit of those who were weak and where everyone spoke freely.
36. I learned to «plan» one day ahead, no further.
37. I learned that kingpins are not human.
38. That there are no criminals at the camp, there are your present (and future) neighbors caught behind the line of the law and not those who crossed it.
39. I learned how terrible the ego of a boy, of a youth is: better steal than ask. This and their boasting throws youth to the bottom.
40. Women didn't play a big role in my life — camp is the reason.
41. The discernment of character is a useless ability — I am unable to change my ways for any scum that comes along.
42. The last in the row, which are hated by everyone — by guards and inmates alike — are those dropping behind, the sick, the weak, those incapable of running in the cold.
43. I learned what power is and what a man with a gun means.
44. That the scale is shifted, and this is what is most typical in a work camp.
45. That passing from a prisoner condition to civilian is very hard, and nearly impossible without a long adaptation period.
46. That a writer must be a stranger — in the subjects he describes. And if he knows the matter well — he will write in such a way that no one would understand him.
Translated by Dmitry Subbotin and Robert Denis.

Saturday, July 11, 2015

The Confederate Flag flap, White privilege and the end game......



I have been busy with work and other stuff.  I was unable to post sooner.   This post took me three days to do, and for that reason it is a long post.  I will tie in several different subjects because my ADD works that way..All postings in black are done by me.  I used different fonts to show other peoples writings.  .. I have some opinions with the flag flap going on in with the Confederate flag, the specter of "White privilege" and what I believe is the end game.  I will start with the Confederate Battle  Flag.If you don't know what it looks like....lemme refresh your memory...

  I have an analogy for the Confederate Flag fiasco.   It has to do with "brand identity".  For example the makers of Band aid...you know this product...

Band-Aid is a brand name of American pharmaceutical and medical devices giant Johnson & Johnson's line of adhesive bandages and related products.
Despite common misconception, Band-Aid is a genericized trademark in the United States.
  Well the makers of "Band-aid" brand of bandages aggressively protect the identity of their product.  Even though the term "Band-aid" is an accepted term for any bandages related product...the makers of other products cannot use the name, the lawyers of Johnson & Johnson are very aggressive in protecting their copyrighted product...for example

the name "Band-aid" will not adorn the package of other brands....
   Same thing applies here....When the Army of Northern Virginia surrendered at Appomattox the confederates furled their battle flags the symbol of a noble cause, the symbol of rebellion against what they saw as "overreach" by the federal government.  Contrary to popular belief..the civil war as it is known to the North, or the "War between the States" as it is politely known in the south or as it is known in less educated area.."The battle against Yankee aggression." was not about slavery, it was the battle for states rights in this case the battle of the states to secede against the Federal system. The Southern veterans  then returned home to reconstruction...
     The south was punished during reconstruction at the behest of the radical republicans...Lincoln was assassinated by  John Wilkes Booth whom was a southern sympathizer right after the war ended.  Lincoln wanted to welcome the breakaway southern states back into the Union and not punish them.  Well he got assassinated and the anger of the North toward the south was palpable.  President Lincoln's Vice President whom became president upon Lincolns death.  President Johnson was the only president that was successfully impeached by the congress for trying to follow Lincoln's policies and treat the South gently.  The south was punished and this caused a lot of hatred, the term "carpetbagger"  was applied prejudicial to anybody that came down here from the north...even now, you will see that word applied, especially from the the people from the deep south.  The South during Reconstruction was under federal control, and the Freedman were giving rights to vote and were treated equally and were represented by the "Freedmans" bureau.  The freed slaves used their vote to elect black republicans to the various state offices...When the federal government pulled their troops out of the south and returned control back to the states in the 1870's, the southern states quickly made moves to put "the uppity blacks in their place."  The black legislators that were in positions were quickly voted out of office.


 During the Reconstruction period of 1865–1877, federal law provided civil rights protection in the U.S. South for freedmen, the blacks who had formerly been slaves, and former free blacks. In the 1870s, Democrats gradually regained power in the Southern legislatures, having used insurgent paramilitary groups, such as the White League and Red Shirts, to disrupt Republican organizing, run Republican officeholders out of town, and intimidate blacks to suppress their voting. Extensive voter fraud was also used. Gubernatorial elections were close and had been disputed in Louisiana for years, with increasing violence against blacks during campaigns from 1868 onward. In 1877, a national Democratic Party compromise to gain Southern support in the presidential election resulted in the government's withdrawing the last of the federal troops from the South. White Democrats had regained political power in every Southern state. These Southern, white, Democratic Redeemer governments legislated Jim Crow laws, officially segregating black people from the white population.
     Where I was going on this historical trip of the dirty laundry of the south is relating to the Confederate flag.  A lot of the groups that were used back in the day to oppress the freed blacks used the Stars and Bars A.K.A. "The Battle Flag" The people that say "Heritage not hate.." where were they at when the symbol of the noble sacrifice was usurped to represent the racism and segregationist policies of the Democrats..They kept silent and lost the right to defend their symbol and the battle flag was now tarred with the brush of "racism".  I know history and I know what the flag meant, but to many it represent "Racism".  It is a shame that this has come to this.   Well the SJW's have used the battle flag to wrap all their many causes from racism, gun control, white privilege, social inequality and have flogged what I call "White America" like a kettle drum.
     This comes to the second part of the post.
                    I pulled these off the "Urban Dictionary" website
    
 white privilege
The privilege of allowing tens of millions of non whites into your country and allowing them to whine and complain endlessly about 'White racism"

the privilege of often being targeted by these other groups for rape and other violent crimes.

the privilege of having your own children brainwashed by the schools funded by your tax dollars, and told that your people are evil, and that they should be ashamed of themselves and their ancestors.

the privilege of being systematically pushed down by Marxist affirmative action laws, in a supposed attempt to "level the playing field

the privilege of becoming a dwindling minority in the nations founded and built by your ancestors.

It is the privilege of being told that you must remain silent and accept your own genocide, because to do otherwise would mean you are a racist, and society has told us a racist is the worst kind of person, worse than even a rapist or thief

This one....
The Emperor's new clothes.

Essentially it's the claim that being White affords one access to universal, institutional or systemic advantages, used by anti-Whites (who use the code-word "anti-racist" to disguise their intentions) to justify overt racial discrimination against Whites, in the hopes of equalizing social and economic outcomes between races, whose disparities are better explained by hereditary differences in intelligence and temperament.

You cannot measure it, and it has no specific concrete definition to provide a basis for proof of its existence, it has not, and can never be proven to exist, but if you question it you're called "ignorant" (in reality you are a skeptic), and the fact that you questioned it in the first place is used as further proof that you have "White privilege".

As seen below the examples of so called "White privilege" are all either statistics presented without context, usually as part of an argumentum ad ignorantum, (disparities in callbacks/hiring is presumed to be racially discriminatory only because an alternative hypothesis is not considered. There is zero evidence for it.) or a meaningless generalisation like:

"-I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group."

Which is correct for 99.999% of all people everywhere, regardless of race.

Or:

"-I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time."

Which again is true for everyone, unless they have gone out of their way to move into a racially alien neighborhood.

Or even the following:

"-I can easily find academic courses and institutions which give attention only to people of my race."

Which is an out and out lie, as it is exactly the opposite of objective reality where affirmative action and quotas, and minority studies classes greatly disadvantage Whites in a way that is measurable, and where the causal relationship is clear to even the most casual observer. 
     or this one
    
The misconception that somehow whites have more benefits than other other races, which is used to guilt whites into feeling shame for things they are powerless to control.

In one of my college course my professor made me analyze this article on suppose white privilege. He never expected my reaction which was that by that definition both blacks and whites have privilege. You see it was stupid stuff you can find a bra to match your skin tone. You can find band aids to match your skin they do have black aid but now days most bandaids are clear lol. You can find toys for your children that match your race check out the barbies and cabbage patch kids and other dolls at the store they have black and white dolls but almost no dolls look Asian or Hispanic. You see this so called privilege is a joke. They say you won't discriminated against if you are white. So telling whites they can not participate. They say only whites are not kept back from activities but a high school just hosted a black lives matter ceremony and told white they could not attend. 
     This is being used by all SJW's out there to belittle and marginalize all white people....This blogpost almost makes me feel like I am writing an article for whatever website follows the White Pride movement, it is the social conditioning I suppose. 

5 reasons why 'white pride' is always racist


By Matt Rozsa

Follow
The Ku Klux Klan is currently sponsoring a Harrison, Ark., billboard that sends the following message: “It’s not racist to love your people. www.WhitePrideRadio.com.” The message is featured next to an adorable photo of a kitten and a puppy. On the White Pride Radio website, the group further clarifies their mission: "A lot of people recognize that there is an ongoing program of genocide against white people. There are websites, newsletters, videos, and radio shows, but too many talk about family without including the family. It has always been our mission to not just promote the white family, but to make them a part of this cause of white Christian revival."


Oddly enough, this isn't the first time that a Harrison billboard has gone viral. Following similar signs in Alabama and Eugene, Ore., a message went up that read: "Anti-racism is code for anti-white." If that doesn't clear it up for you, let's put it bluntly: White pride is always racism, always. Here's why.

1) Whiteness is an artificial sociological construct which has been used throughout history to exclude certain groups of people from the rights guaranteed others and to justify bigoted attitudes.

As Nell Irvin Painter explains in The History of White People, the notion of “white culture” is a myth. “Our culture was founded in 1789 right about the same moment that Blumenbach was inventing Caucasians—this moment of racialization,” she told Salon in an interview from 2010. “Some people say race is in our national DNA so that we just can’t get away from it. I don’t know if we ever will.” 
While the institution of slavery made it difficult to keep accurate genealogical records for African-American families, the American slave trade sold into servitude West Africans from among the tribes of Sierra Leone, Senegambia, and the Gold Coast, as well as other areas along the coast. White Americans, however, are not a single ethnic group or a distinct number of ethnicities; they are an amalgamation of everyone who benefits from white privilege, and its boundaries are always shifting.


      You can read the rest of the Bilge Here.    The problem is that it is acceptable now in our culture to beat up white people from the "knockout game" to "Polar Bear Hunting"..   if the author of this prior article had written an article" Why Black Pride is Racist", the author would be pilloried and literally run out of a job.  There is a double standard in our society.   Check out Youtube and put in "White Privilege", the vitroil you see is believed by many in the SJW community.  They believe that the whites stole everything from government, to inventions to money and power.  They believe that it is their job to right the "rules of inequality" to make it "fair" for all the non-white people.  There is a show on MTV now that belittles white people, I don't know where all this will end.  I have my suspicion and I will touch on this on the 3rd part of this blog.   I don't know, I have never been a benefit of white privilege, I worked for everything I have, I have been discriminated against in job opportunities job placement, schools, ete,ete.  I am not bitter, it is the reality of the world I live in.  But it will be worse for my son, he will find the deck stacked against him from the institutional discrimination against a hetro white male, the only demographic that it is OK to insult and discriminate against.  From the government, schools, and society his road will be harder than mine.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

    I really wish people could get past all this "racism" stuff and focus on character and not group identities and rights.....

   Now to the 3rd part of my rant.  the EndGame....You have noticed the drumbeats of the SJW's against white people and this is by design...Most all of them have read the book by Saul Alinsky, The Rules for Radicals
     Most of the SJW's are schooled in Marxist thoughts and beliefs..this is by intent,

In Rules for Radicals, several themes persist throughout Alinsky’s lessons to future community organizers. The most notable is his use of symbol construction to strengthen the unity within an organization. Often, he would draw on loyalty to a particular church or religious affiliation to create a firmly structured organization with which to operate. The reason being that symbols by which communities could identify themselves created strongly structured organizations that were easier to mobilize in implementing direct action. Once the community was united behind a common symbol, Alinsky would find a common enemy for the community to be united against.
The use of common enemy against a community was done to promote another theme of Rules for Radicals, nonviolent conflict as a uniting element in communities. Alinsky would find an external antagonist to turn into a common enemy for the community within which he was operating. Often, this enemy would be a local politician or agency that had some involvement with activity that was causing detriment to the community. His goal was to unite a group through conflict with an external antagonist. Once the enemy was established, the community would come together in opposition of it.
     This management of conflict heightened awareness within the community as to the similarities its members shared as well as what differentiated them from those outside of their organization. The use of conflict also allowed for the goal of the group to be clearly defined. With an established external antagonist, the community’s goal would be to defeat that enemy, whether it be a politician, policy, or opposing agency.

     I have mentioned in the past that the modern SJW's are Marxist and they are doing what history taught them.  I will  make a historical point..remember the external antagonist that is required for the SJW's?

According to the political theory of Marxism–Leninism of the early 20th century, the kulaks were class enemies of the poorer peasants. Vladimir Ilyich Lenin described them as "bloodsuckers, vampires, plunderers of the people and profiteers, who fatten on famine.” Marxism–Leninism had intended a revolution to liberate poor peasants and farm laborers alongside the proletariat (urban and industrial workers). In addition, the planned economy of Soviet Bolshevism required the collectivisation of farms and land to allow industrialisation or conversion to large-scale agricultural production. In practice, government officials violently seized kulak farms and murdered resisters; others were deported to labor camps.

    According to the political theory of Marxism–Obamaism of the early 21th century, the white people were class enemies of the poorer peasants. Barack Obama described them as "bloodsuckers, vampires, bitter clingers, plunderers of the people and profiteers, who fatten on white privilege.” Marxism–Obamaism intended a revolution to liberate poor urban people and farm laborers alongside the cube dweller. In addition, the planned economy of Globalism Bolshevism required the collectivization of assets to allow  the future green economy or conversion to large-scale clean energy production. In practice, government officials violently seized white middle class assets and murdered resisters; others were deported to FEMA camps..

     It isn't much of a stretch, I see history replaying before me, I see the same thing that Lenin and later Stalin did to break the power of the kulaks whom were land owning peasants.  In the modern sense, they need to break what they call the political power of the middle class to guarantee their power.  If they can use social pressure to make a law to seize the assets of people that are considered "class enemies".  Remember the 401K's that millions of people have....most of them are middle class and white.  That is an example.  That is billions of dollars sitting in there where the government can't touch it....But the government can change the rules, then seize it....You doubt me?  look at Greece, Cyprus and other places.  The government seized assets for the "Common good".  See a parallel?  the outrage you see against whites is just an excuse for plunder on a wide scale.  The government in the name of social justice and equality can and will seize assets....They will use the social outrage, the same thing Lenin and Stalin used against the Kulaks to further the transforming of Russia into the Soviet Union.  The enemy of the political elites are the middle class, the SJW's are useful idiots being used to create a have and an have not society.  The middle class is a check on the power of the political elite.  The elitist would have a complete society that depended on them for sustenance..once you control their sustenance, you control them....then you can do whatever you wanted.  That is the Endgame.