Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Showing posts with label middle east. Show all posts
Showing posts with label middle east. Show all posts

Sunday, November 26, 2023

"Are The Palestinians open to peace and reconciliation?"

 

I clipped this off Quora, where there is a lot of screeching from the leftist and antisemitic about the current kerfluffle going on and facts have no bearings on their feelings.  What you are seeing in the schools and the protest here in the States and in Europe are a 2 fold problem, First off, Europe has been importing the 3rd world for several generations, and they bring the 3rd world beliefs with them, as well as the United States, we have also been for several generation been indoctrinating our children in these hives of villainy called a higher education system.  According to the intersectional victimhood politics of the left, the Palestinians are the "Victims" no matter what they do because they are resisting the "Colonizer" That would be Israel. and they have been taught that there are 2 groups of people in the world, the "Colonizer" and the "oppressed".  They see the Palestinians as "Victims" despite the fact that the Palestinians would cheerfully chunk half of them off a building doesn't even register to them.  That is how delusional they are.  You also factor in our very porous Southern border, I see terror attacks coming and the Donks will use them to push through draconian "security" a.k.a "Gun Control, Currency control, population movement controls, information control," and other measures to control the population, "Can't let a crisis go to waste" ya know.  I have stated in the past, we have a large chunk of the population that if we got attacked, would cheerfully support the attackers because we "deserve it" due to the intersectional politics of the left.  



    A guy named Geoff Caplan posted this one.

There has been a recent study conducted by Arab World for Research and Development (AWRAD) among Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank, and the results are profoundly depressing.

AWRAD is an internationally respected research and consultancy agency based in Palestine.

Rejection of peace and reconciliation

The great majority are against peace with Israel on any terms:

  • 75% support the October 7 massacre
  • 85.9% reject coexistence with Israel
  • 71.1% are committed to the restoration of “historical Palestine” as a final resolution
  • 74.7% support the creation of a Palestinian state “from the river to the sea” as the only acceptable resolution of the conflict.

Support for terrorism

There is almost universal support for terror:

  • 76% believe that Hamas plays a somewhat to very positive role
  • 84% believe that Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) plays a somewhat to very positive role
  • 79.8% believe that Fatah’s terror wing, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, plays a somewhat to very positive role
  • 88.6% believe that Hamas’ armed wing, the Al-Kassam Brigades, plays a somewhat to very positive role.

Terror organisations have far higher support than Fatah

Fatah is hardly a force for moderation, but they are far too moderate for their own people:

  • 87.3% of the Palestinians believe that the Palestinian Authority plays a negative role
  • Only 8.4% believe that the PA should govern the West Bank and Gaza
  • 85.8% support Hamas continuing to play a role in the Palestinian government
  • 13.6% support a Hamas-only government
  • 72.2% support a “national unity” government of Fatah and Hamas.

Ingratitude and hostility towards aid providers

Negativity towards aid providers is extreme:

  • 98.2% of Palestinians see the U.S. role as negative
  • 96.7% consider the UK role as negative
  • 92.6% consider the EU role as negative.
  • 85.5% believe that these countries support Israel because of “hatred of Arabs
  • 79.5% believe that support is the result of “hatred of Muslims and Islam”

More moderate Arab countries working towards peace are equally hated:

  • 96% disapprove of the UAE
  • 95.5% disapprove of Saudi Arabia
  • 84.6% disapprove of Egypt
  • 75.6% disapprove of Jordan.

Unrealistic views on the current military situation

As an indication of the levels of self-delusion in operation here:

  • 72.6% said “Palestine” will win the current military conflict
  • 3.1% said Israel will win.

Western fellow travellers are equally delusional

Since the outbreak of the current conflict I have heard western apologists claim 100 times that:

“Hamas is not Palestine - why should the ordinary people suffer when all they want is peace?

Clearly, this is the worst kind of bias and wishful thinking.

This study shows that ongoing conflict is precisely what the majority of Palestinians support - and the more brutal the better.

It certainly explains why Israel is still wary of letting down her defences - even more so after their latest intelligence failures on the Gazan border.

Here’s a graphic summary of the result which you could share if you are so minded:

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Post about the Kurds...



I shamelessly cribbed this from the "GodFather" Tom Kratman.   Apparently the Neocons and the media are using President Trump's decision to pull out of Syria and the Kurds, and they all are having meltdowns"Orange Man Bad".  I am of the mindset, Obungler shouldn't have put us in the middle of the clown circus to begin with.  Sure the Kurds are allies, but which Kurds?   There are Iraqi Kurds, Syrian Kurds and Turkish Kurds.  I am not a peacenik by any means, but we can't be the worlds Policeman.  Nobody over there is our friends, well perhaps the Kuwaiti's and the Israili's.  The others.....well not so much.   The "GodFather" posted this on Facebook and it was a worthy rant.

Our Gallant Allies, the Kurds (and other fairy tales)
Ah, the Kurds. How can mere words render a proper appreciation? They’re trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous…um…no; no, they’re not. Oh, sure, as individuals they can be fairly boon companions, but in the main and in the mass? Not so much.
My first experience of the Kurds – rather, of how the rest of the area thinks of and feels about them – was before I’d ever met my first one. This was at a majlis, in the town of Judah (or Goodah), Saudi Arabia, sometime in December or so, 1990. Citizenship is kind of an iffy and flexible concept in that part of the world, so there were folk from Saudi, from Oman, from the Emirates. There was even one Arab who insisted he was a citizen of the Gulf Cooperation Council, since he was a fully documented citizen of so many places in the GCC. I had my doubts right up until he pulled out a bilingual ID card which, indeed, did seem to list him as a citizen of the GCC. One of the attendees had brought with him a book detailing the results of the chemical attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja by the army and air force of Saddam Hussein.
It was really heartbreaking, all those picture of gassed, dead, discolored, and decomposing Kurdish kids, who are, in fact, every bit as cute as the papers and television made them out to be. At least when they’re not dead they are. My team sergeant, Sig, and I were duly appalled and sickened.
The Arabs, though, didn’t seem to understand. To paraphrase, “What’s the problem? Don’t you understand that these were _Kurds_ who got gassed?”
At the time, I found that attitude completely inexplicable.
Fast forward a few months; we’ve incited the Kurds and Shia to rise up and overthrow Saddam. They didn’t, of course, while such an uprising would have looked difficult and might have done us some good. Oh, no; instead the Shia – whose rebellion was spontaneous, anyway – waited until it looked like the Iraqi Army was crushed and such an uprising would be easy. The Kurds – who were organized – waited even longer.
Sorry, boys, but when we offer you a quid pro quo, that doesn’t translate into “free lunch.” Moreover, when we’ve already offered someone a cease­fire it’s a bit late to try to get us to start hostilities again. In short, we owed them nothing.
Fast forward, again, to late May, 1991. I’d come home from the Middle East, hung around a while, and been sent back, this time to Operation Provide Comfort, the Kurdish Rescue, there to quasi govern a few towns, run refugee camps, coordinate humanitarian relief, and such like. While we’re waiting in the camp on the Turkish side of the border, not too far from Silopi, overwatched by a Turkish police fort on a hill, some Kurds got in position to fire at the fort such that, should the fort return fire, the Turks will be shooting at us. So much for gratitude from people you’re trying to save, eh?
Fortunately, Turkish discipline held firm and enlightened Kurdish dreams of advancing the cause of having a homeland of their own by getting their rescuers killed came to naught. After a couple of days at the camp, the crew I’m with and I are ordered forward to link up with the British Marines and their Dutch counterparts, already inside Kurdestan. We’re riding in on the back of a British Bedford Lorry, one which, based on the comfort of the ride, probably crossed the Rhine with Monty in 1945…after enduring the entire war in North Africa. If it had a suspension it was tolerably hard to see, and impossible to feel.
Sitting next to me is a Staff Sergeant Farnsworth. Farnsworth and I are both grunts, so we’re doing what grunts do when there’s nothing better to do and neither sleep nor playing cards nor reading are possible; we’re analyzing the terrain. It is fiercely rugged, with winding roads going through narrow passes between hills and mountains difficult enough to climb on foot and impossible for vehicles. Reverse slopes were of such an angle as would make defenders largely invulnerable to artillery and would make even high angle mortar fire of much reduced effect. In any case, at a certain point, looking over a particularly defensible pass, Farnsworth and I looked at each other. I no longer remember who spoke first but the conversation went like this: “If the Kurds­“ “­couldn’t defend themselves­“ “­in this kind of terrain­“ “­they don’t deserve­“ “­their own country.” And that was before we even knew how much they used mines.
*****
A little digression is in order here. As mentioned previously, Kurdish kids are adorable. (The women are also quite fetching, right up until they’re worn out, usually by age twenty-­four or so, from being used like mules, which is to say, beasts of burden, but who, unlike mules, can still bear young…and must.) Most people shy away from or are at least ignorant of the reason so many of those adorable kids died. It’s simple; the Kurds starved them to death themselves. It’s a cultural imperative among them, when times get hard, to let the little girls die of starvation (first, of course), and then the little boys. Good guess, dear reader; why, no, I didn’t like that for beans. As a matter of fact, now that you ask, I’m not much for multiculturalism, in general, either.
*****
Interestingly, before we even arrived in our area, there had been an incident – a firefight resulting in several Iraqi dead – between the British Marines and some Iraqi troops guarding one of Hussein’s palaces in that part of Iraq. I asked a British officer about it and his answer was to the effect that, “As near as we can figure, as one of our patrols was passing, two Kurds, from different positions but surely with coordination, took a shot each, close to simultaneously. One shot was at our patrol, the other at the Iraqi on the gate to the palace. Both shots missed, but the Iraqis and our men, thinking they were under attack, reacted as one would expect. We were just a lot better shots, better led, than they were. Poor bastards. One of the reasons we’re quite sure that the Iraqis didn’t shoot first was that, as our men passed, they waved at each other, as soldiers will who have no particular reasons for enmity.”
*****
The main town I ran was Assyrian and Christian, Catholic, actually, having their own rite but being in full communion with Rome. It was an experience to attend mass held in Aramaic, the language of Jesus, a memory I rather cherish despite not understanding a word of it. They are nice people, the Assyrians, seriously nice people. I’ve dealt with a lot of different kinds of foreigners, over the years, even married one, for that matter, and liked almost all of them. But the Assyrians have a special place. They’re also amazingly hardworking. They can’t defend themselves or, at least, they don’t think they can, which amounts to the same thing.
Everyone knows about the Armenian genocide. The genocide of the Assyrians, around the same time period, was about as bad and may have been worse, as a percentage of the pre­massacre population. And among the chief agents of that genocide? Of both of them, really? You guessed it, the Kurds.
I asked my Assyrian translator there, once, what he and the other Assyrians really wanted. He answered, “We’d like the British to come back and run the place, permanently. Failing that, we’d be very happy to be subjects of the American Empire, if you would just declare one. If that’s not possible, then letting the Iraqis back would be minimally acceptable. Under no circumstance, however, do we want to be under the Kurds.”
That main town was the only one in which no Kurdish babies died, of the smallish number that the Kurds didn’t let starve anyway, and the only one in which there were no political or ethnic murders in that time period. Part of that was probably my own rather forthright approach to domestic harmony – “One incident, just one, and I’ll cut off your food, medical care, and other goodies, causing all your followers to desert you for other groups and leaders I haven’t proscribed!” – but part of it, too, at least for the long term maintenance of the thing, was probably the perception among themselves that the various Kurdish groups needed one safe area in which to engage in local diplomacy, and, since this one area was peaceful, well, why not? That meant a lot of luncheons, meaning, yes, I had the chance to meet most of the bright lights of Kurdish domestic politics and self­-determination of the day. I’ve long since forgotten their names, but am pretty sure I could identify most of them in a police lineup and wouldn’t, of course, mind doing so. One in particular stands out in my mind, a rather distinguished looking middle aged barbarian who had once, over what amounts to a domestic dispute, murdered some thirty-­seven Christian men, women, and children. And then there was the day the Kurds demanded to be paid. Paid? Why, yes, we were providing free food, free medical care, free shelter, and free security, but they saw no reason not to be paid for unloading the free food and other goodies. I sent the trucks back with the food until they knuckled under.
*****
Thus, it might be better for the United States, before pinning too much hope and faith on the Kurds, to understand that they’re military imbeciles with an unearned and undeserved reputation, that their culture is barbaric, they their one talent seems to be propagandizing and manipulating liberal Western opinion, which is eager to be manipulated, anyway, that any kids who die usually do so because of their own neglect of those kids, that they have no sense of gratitude for any help you give them, that they treat women like donkeys, and that they place zero value on the lives of those who try to help them.
Why we, or anyone, would place our faith and trust in them…well, it eludes me. To help that lesson stick in your mind I offer a Kurdish National Anthem, written by my team sergeant, Sig, in a moment of complete disgust with them. Every line tells a story: (Tune: O Tannenbaum)
A voice without a hint of shame
Cries, “It’s all your fault; you’re all to blame.
We must be clothed, we must be fed
And when that’s done build our homesteads”
Chorus:
A Kurd can have no greater love
Than his brand new Kalashnikov;
O Kurdestan, my Kurdestan,
Do what you want; grab what you can.
You gave us shelter overhead
Doctors and blankets for our beds.
You’ve saved us from Iraqi raids,
Now tell us when do we get paid?
Chorus
We fought the Turks, we fought Iran
We fought Iraq for Kurdestan.
And now you’ve made us free and strong,
We’ll kill the Christians when you’re gone.
Chorus
This column is dedicated to the memory of Father Hanna Marko, of Mangesh, Iraq.

Friday, February 2, 2018

Iran-Iraq War as a bedtime Story

I shamelessly cribbed this from "Angry Staff Officer", like I keep saying every time I do this, it is Mac's fault for turning me onto this guy ...so blame him.  I remembered in 1980 when the war started, I was a freshman in Highschool and I supported Iraq because after the crap the Iranians did with our Embassy, funny 10 years later I was in the desert fighting the same Iraqi army.  Shows what kids know about future events.


The Schoolyard Bully: A Bedtime Story of the Iran-Iraq Conflict

By Dan Kim
Author’s note: This fantastical post is the brainchild of a friend who joked about me reading a story to my daughter, but instead wanted me to read him a bedtime story about the Iran-Iraq War.  After a few lines, the friend and ASO planted the seed, like, why not turn one of the most senseless conflicts of the late 20th century into a children’s book?  I’ve read SO SO much absolute dreck in terms of little-kid literature the last 9 years, that I could mimic the language and rhythm in my sleep.  If you like this, I take all credit; if not, I’ll know whom to blame.
Once upon a time, in a not-so-magical neighborhood far away called the Arabian Gulf, Saddam lived next door to a rich boy named Emir and a perpetually angry boy named Ruhollah.  One day, Saddam and Ruhollah had a disagreement over who could play in the Shatt-al-Arab part of their neighborhood’s playground.
Saddam-Hussein-y-el-ayatollah-Ruhollah-Khomeini.jpg
The bullies were very mad at each other and wore special angry hats when they were angry. Do you have a special angry hat?
saddam-hussein.jpg
Saddam sulked when he was sad. Should you sulk when you’re mad? No, you should not.
Saddam had friends named Jacques and Ivan, but once they realized that Saddam wanted to pick a fight with Ruhollah, Jacques switched schools but still helped Saddam with a side project in Osirak.  Ivan analyzed what he called the correlation of forces, and when he found no geopolitical advantage in being as close with Saddam, Ivan decided to play with different friends on Kabul Street.  Poor Saddam, his best friends deserted him when he needed them the most.
Ruhollah was an angry boy who didn’t like anyone in the neighborhood and wanted to fight everyone.  Ruhollah wondered why he didn’t have more friends, besides some little kids two streets over in Beirut.  Ruhollah said, “I don’t need any friends, I can use what I already have in the house, and do this all on my own.”  Ruhollah was very proud of his self-sufficiency.
Emir and his buddy Faisal were the rich kids on the block.  Nobody liked them, but they were so rich that everyone still wanted to be their friend.  They were also very generous with neighborhood boys who wanted to be their friend.  Faisal helped Saddam buy shiny new toys like Exocets and Mirage F1s.  Emir didn’t want anyone to know, but he paid protection money to both Ruhollah and Saddam so they wouldn’t pick on him.
One day, Saddam had had enough of Ruhollah’s taunts, and started a fight.  Emir threw money at both of them and hid in his basement.  Faisal watched from a distance, not wanting to overtly support either side until he knew who would win.  Saddam and Ruhollah’s fight seemed to last forever.  Neither one seemed to get tired, no matter how many toys got smashed.  This lasted well past recess into fifth period.
WAR_IRAN038_xgaplus.jpg
They made a BIG mess. Does your mother make you clean up your messes? 
Jacques finally left the neighborhood for good when an older boy named Menachem smashed Jacques’ sand castle in Osirak.  Ruhollah, when he wasn’t fighting Saddam, was trying to get his Beirut buddies to poke a boy named Ronnie three towns over.  Ronnie got annoyed, but one day, Ruhollah went too far and sank some of Emir’s boats in the pond.  Ronnie was a good friend to Faisal, and since Faisal was such a good friend to Emir, Ronnie felt like he had to stick up for Emir.
Ronnie punched Ruhollah a lot harder than Ruhollah expected, even while Ronnie’s helpers were fixing or replacing Ruhollah’s toys behind Saddam’s back.  Saddam wanted to get in on this, and tried to start a side fight with Ronnie, but Ronnie was so big that Saddam was too afraid to take it further.  Meanwhile, both Ruhollah and Saddam were running out of toys to throw at each other.  It had been a long, long fight over every corner of the playground including Al-Faw, Karbala, Suleimaniyah, and the marshes.  Both boys were very tired.  Faisal and Emir made them stop fighting, shake hands, and go home.
Saddam was still very angry, even after Hashemi moved into Ruhollah’s house.  Saddam hadn’t wanted to stop fighting, but Emir and Faisal had given him a lot of money to stop.  Eventually, a boy named George moved into Ronnie’s house.  George had lots of friends.  George’s best friends were Maggie and Faisal.
1167px-Margaret_Thatcher_poses_with_George_H._W._Bush_1987.jpg
Isn’t it nice to have friends? Do your friends agree to invade foreign countries with you?
Because he couldn’t stay away from a fight, one day, Saddam sucker punched Emir when George wasn’t looking.  Saddam also tried to steal Emir’s lunch money.  Maggie grabbed George and made sure George wouldn’t go all wobbly.  George wanted to punch the boy who had punched his friend Emir, but didn’t know how until Maggie showed him.  Maggie was a tough girl who was used to fighting bullies, and had recently beat up a boy named Leopoldo so badly that Leopoldo had to move away.
George called on all the friends he’d met before he moved into Ronnie’s house.  There were so many!  Hafez, Hosni, Hussein – even Jacques moved back to the neighborhood to deal with the bully he’d once helped.  Ivan’s doddering dad Gorby tried to stop everyone from fighting, but George and Maggie wanted to deal with mean old Saddam once and for all.  Menachem wanted to break more sand castles like he had in Osirak, but George made sure Menachem stayed out of the scrap for now.
All the kids on George’s side gave Saddam until sundown to leave Emir’s house.  Saddam didn’t like to listen to anyone, not least the older kids like Maggie or George.  Well, they showed him once the sun set.  They beat Saddam up, but not too badly, just enough to convince him to leave Emir’s house – but not so badly that Billy and Little George wouldn’t have to deal with his antics later on.
74187-004-2B8FA823.jpg
So many messes. You  should listen to your mother and don’t make messes like these.
Eventually, everyone except John (who had moved into Maggie’s house) and George left the neighborhood.  Hashemi sent a thank you note to Saddam for all the airplanes, and paid Ivan for even more.  Faisal and Emir felt that a tiny bit of gold on the Kuwait Liberation Medal, and maybe a few contracts to George to protect their houses, would be enough to keep the neighborhood at peace.  Everyone cheered George’s favorite bully Norman, but many of the kids who used to play with Norman wondered how he’d gotten that far in the first place.  John and Fred, who weren’t bullies but did more to beat up Saddam than Norman, were almost forgotten.
A long time later, Saddam would feel an itch to fight again, and Little George would want to finish what Big George started, but that’s another story…
The End.
Sweet dreams!


Wednesday, September 4, 2013

A quick guide to understanding the Middle East..

This graph is a tongue in cheek representation of the middle east.   To expound upon it, Everything over there is based on "tribe" or family.  The tribal ties are stronger than the national identity, the average person has a stronger loyalty to "his" family or tribe than to the nation.  As far as Syria, understand that Assaud is fighting so his tribe and extended family survives, if he loses, his family and extended family will be tortured then wiped out.  That is how it is in a nutshell over there.  I remembered a term that I used to describe Africa, " it is always 5 minutes to high noon somewhere in Africa".  That same phrase holds true for the middle east.  With the conflicting sunnia/shiites division in Islam that causes a lot of bloodshed.  Kinda like the Catholic/Protestant feuding in Ireland but on a much larger scale.   We don't have a dog in this fight in Syria, no matter who we help, they will hate us.  It is better that they solve their own division rather than drag us into it.


Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The Middle East situation in a nutshell





Two Middle East mothers are sitting in a cafe chatting over a plate of tabouli and a pint of goat's milk.

The older of the two pulls a small folder out of her handbag and starts flipping through photos. They start reminiscing.

''This is my oldest son, Mujibar. He would have been 24 years old now.''

''Yes, I remember him as a baby.'' says the other mother cheerfully.

"He's a martyr now though." the mother confides.

"Oh, so sad dear...'' says the other.

''And this is my second son, Khalid. He would have been 21.''

''Oh, I remember him,'' says the other happily, ''he had such curly hair when he was born.''

''He's a martyr too...'' says the mother quietly.

''Oh, gracious me...'' says the other.

''And this is my third son. My baby. My beautiful Ahmed. He would have been 18'', she whispers.

"Yes," says the friend enthusiastically, ''I remember when he first started school...''

''He's a martyr also,'' says the mother, with tears in her eyes.

After a pause and a deep sigh, the second Muslim mother looks wistfully at the photographs and, searching for the right words, says . . .



"They blow up so fast, don't they?"
 

 

Monday, September 24, 2012

Obama's Priority (Fixed the image)





                             

    Inhaling the koolaid...
EXCERPT:  "President Obama will be among the world leaders arriving in New York on Monday for the U.N. General Assembly, but unlike other presidents or prime ministers Obama plans to head straight for a daytime TV interview. The president’s schedule has him and first lady Michelle Obama sitting down for a taping of ABC’s “The View" shortly after arriving in New York. Though Obama will deliver a major speech Tuesday before the annual assembly, he has largely left the one-on-one meetings to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sparking criticism that he appears more concerned about his re-election effort than talking directly to other world leaders about such issues as Iran’s quest for nuclear capability and the violent, deadly protests in the Middle East and North Africa."

     But he keeps dodging BiBi and the Iran issues...gotta get reelected...ya know...priorities

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Iran sends forces to aid Syria

It looks like Iran is trying to become a major player in the region, with Iraq neutralized by infighting Iran is capitalizing on its relation with Syria.  The same Iran that sent revolutionary guards to kill American G.I in Iraq is sending troops to prop up the Syrian president in the fighting that is going on in his country.  This will basically tie Syria closer to Iran especially if Israel have to bomb the Iranian nuclear ambitions, this almost would force Syria to attack Israel to support its treaty obligations along with Syria wanting the Golan Heights back.  With Egypt on the cusp of electing a muslim brotherhood as its president this will force a two front war with Israel and the tepid relations between Israel and its most important ally the United States, with Obungler overt support of the Muslim Brotherhood this makes Israel alone in the middle east, a very dangerous position to be in.
 

Tehran Sent Troops to Syria - Iranian Officer

RIA Novosti
13:35 29/05/2012
MOSCOW, May 29 (RIA Novosti) - A senior Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander has admitted that Iran has sent its troops to help the regime of embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad fight opposition forces.
“Before our presence in Syria, too many people were killed by the opposition but with the physical and non-physical presence of the Islamic republic, big massacres in Syria were prevented,” Ismail Gha’ani, the deputy head of Iran’s Quds force, a shadowy branch of the Revolutionary Guards in charge of overseas operations, said in an interview with the semi-official Iranian Student’s News Agency (ISNA), according to a report by the Persian-language GozaraNews website.
ISNA published the interview on Sunday night, but subsequently removed it from its website “under pressure,” the report said.
Syria is Iran’s most important regional ally, and Tehran has long used its neighbor’s territory as a base for operations to maintain a lifeline to militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas, Iran’s proxies in southern Lebanon and Gaza.
Rumors that Iran has provided military support to Assad, to assist his crackdown on the popular uprising that has challenged his family’s 40-year grip on power, have circulated since the outbreak of protests in Syria in March 2011.
The Gha’ani remarks followed the weekend massacre of more than 100 civilians, including dozens of children, in the Houla township in western Syria, which has triggered an international outcry, including a Sunday statement by the UN Security Council describing the massacre as an “outrageous use of force against civilian population.”
Syrian opposition activists have blamed the killings on pro-government fighters, an accusation categorically denied by the Syrian authorities, who said the tragedy was a terrorist plot aimed at undermining the regime.
UN observers working in Syria have confirmed that tanks and artillery were used in the weekend attacks on Houla, as well as that many of those killed were stabbed or shot at point-blank range, raising questions among observers about who could benefit from the tragedy.