Impeachment of President Obama?

I have been reading some of the blogs in the blogosphere and there is a push to impeach President Obama for failure to heed his oath of office and corruption, basically the High Crimes and Misdemeanors" and haul him in front of the senate to face charges.   For the many scandals and irregularities that are evident.  In a perfect world, I would say " sure".  But we don't live in a perfect world.  The republicans got burned big time trying to get Clinton for perjury or "lying under oath"   Remember the Monica Lewenski scandal?  Well the democrats and the media turned it into " It is all about sex" and is oral sex or not?  The media trumpeted the line that it is all about sex, sex,sex...nothing about perjury .  They controlled the initiative and Ken Starr who is a honest prosecutor was vilified in the media.  A lot of the republicans got burned by this.  Also in a perfect world, the rule of law would be sacrosanct but we live in a country that the rule of law has been replaced by the rule of man or the rule of the mob.  The republicans won't have the stones to try an impeachment of President Obama no matter how many laws he breaks.

      President Obama has the control of the mob.  If the republicans tried to do an impeachment , the narrative would be " well it is because he is a black man"  The inner cities and area that are overrun with urban yoots and other hard core democrats will explode in riots since they believe that President Obama is persecuted because he is a " Strong black man" and "whitey don't like that".  Don't like those words...They ain't mine..I have heard this from Al Sharpton and other race pimps since President Obama burst into the scene back in 2007.   We will just have to keep pounding on his administration and pick off the people around him.  Forget going after President Obama, he has the trump card, he can play the race card and get a pass from the guilt driven liberals and the conservatives will be called "racist" or Goodwins Law  will be enacted.  We have to just marginalize him as much as possible.

     The Obama Administration is more like something we’d see in a corrupt African country, run by someone like Idi Amin than an Administration run by Americans in a free Republic.  This is what happens when "hope and change" is elected.  The founding fathers feared such base emotions, we were formed as a constitutional republic not a democracy.  The founding Fathers considered "Democracy" or the Athenian way to be mob rule.  Constitutional Republic safe guards everything under the rule of law.  Not the rule of the mob that can be swayed by emotions that are counter to the long term interest of the country.


    Here are some more pictures that I have used on the past to compare President Obama to the 3rd world countries that use the same tactics that he uses against his political enemies.

 

Robert Mugabe, the President of Zimbabwe, it used to be the breadbasket of Africa, but due to misrule and corruption, they now have to import foodstuff to feed its population.  He uses mob rule and uses the organs of the state to target his political enemies.

President Obama, the President of the United States, We used to be the beacon of freedom and a country that believed in its own exceptionalism.  Now we have 1 out of 7 people drawing some kind of government assistance and he promises Obama Phones to his loyal subjects.  He also uses mob rule, he uses the organs of the state to go after his political enemies.
   

Karzai wants the U.S. to guarentee 2 billion annually

I am missing something here, the corrupt Afghan president after crapping all over us during the Koran incident the repeatedly green on blue incidents, and throwing us under the bus internationally now wants the United states to give them 2 billion dollars to train the Afghan military and police.  Lessee the level of corruption in the Afghan armed forces and the police is already legendary, the Officers regularly steal from their their own troops, they stiff their training and rip off their pay and rations to self enrich themselves.  I wonder how much of this money will " vanish" to super secret accounts in Switzerland and other places once we pull out they will have a nice nest egg to live lavishly after the taliban sweep in because of the rampant corruption of the government officials have impacted the average Afghan.

Afghan President Wants US to Guarantee $2 Billion Annually

April 17, 2012
Brian Padden | Islamabad, Pakistan
A day after Afghan forces with NATO support fought off multiple attacks by Taliban militants, Afghan President Hamid Karzai is focusing on ensuring international financial support after most Western combat troops leave in 2014. In a speech Tuesday, Karzai said he wants the U.S. to guarantee at least $2 billion annually to fund the Afghan army and police under a strategic partnership agreement now being negotiated between the two countries.
Both the U.S. and Afghanistan want a strategic partnership agreement to demonstrate America's commitment to stay engaged in Afghanistan after 2014. Karzai said negotiations have stalled over whether or not to include in the agreement a minimum of $2 billion dollars a year to fund the Afghan army and police.
Karzai said the U.S. side indicated that in the future it may want to increase the amount of funding, but that he wants the strategic partnership document to include a written guarantee that Washington will provide at least $2 billion to Afghan security forces annually.
U.S. officials said they could pay up to about $4 billion a year to fund Afghan forces. But they also said the strategic pact is not meant to be a detailed aid package, but rather a broad framework committing both sides to continue to work together for years to come.
Sunday's attacks by Taliban militants in the Afghan capital and in the eastern Nangarhar, Logar and Paktia provinces have raised concerns about the readiness of Afghan forces to maintain security without U.S. and NATO support.
U.S. officials are pushing to sign the deal before a NATO conference in Chicago in May.
But negotiations over the long-term pact with the U.S. have dragged on for months as Karzai has asked for specific commitments before signing. The biggest of these demands - that the U.S. transfer authority over detainees and night raids to the Afghan government - have been recently resolved.
The Afghan president's comments suggest a growing concern on the Afghan side that the U.S. will not follow through on its promises after most American soldiers leave.
The U.S. has already greatly reduced some funding for development programs in Afghanistan, and a number of NATO nations are accelerating their withdrawal timetables. On Tuesday, Australia announced it would to pull out its troops nearly a year earlier than planned.