"The Michigan Problem goes Transatlantic"

 Europe has a big problem, especially England, France Germany and Sweden, and to a lesser extent the other countries of Western Europe.  The unfettered migration from 3rd world crapholes to the 1st world has transformed large swaths of western europe into "No-go" zones for the locals and the transplants run it like an islamic caliphate with sharia laws in place.  Try walking in the major cities like Berlin, London, Koln, Paris, Vienna, and so forth, especially near the train stations and pull out a camera and start filming, you will be attacked, harassed, spit upon and if you have a dog you will have some clown screaming "Haram" at you....Yes I have seen too many of the video's to doubt this anymore.  so many of the churches have been set fire by "Youth" with "fireworks"....that is the official party line.....funny that the fireworks are selective with the damage and they don't describe the "youths".......Yeah right....yank on the other one....it has bells on it...."Mutti Merkel" did irreprible damage to Germany with her immigration policies...

    The pics are from my "Stash"

   The Elites and the legacy media have sold the local population out, whenever there is a conflict with the locals and the migrants, the polizei will take the side of the migrants.  The locals know this and that is why the support for the AFD party grew soo much in the past few years, they are being told one thing by news and their leaders and they are seeing something totally different.  They are seeing the pensioners getting kicked out of their government apartments to house the migrants and they have no recourse.  Their women are being assaulted and they are told to accept it as part of "multiculturalism"...no matter how henius the crime the migrants are not punished....but released.  Yeah the anger is building.   The countries in Eastern Europe are not accepting the edicts of the bureaucrats of Brussels, and are keeping their borders closed much to the chagrin of the elites and the same bureaucrats, who are not affected by the policies that they push on everyone else.   We are having to deal with the same problem here, although not as bad, but we have the same adherents of the "religion of peace" trying to set up enclaves in Texas, and other places and it is about conquest, not assimilation to the host culture.  I use Lebanon as an example, when the PLO were kicked out of Jordan and other countries, they settled in Lebanon, and used the laws against the locals, they swung the elections to candidates that favored the PLO and overtime became a majority and Beirut that used to be called the "Paris of the Middle East" became embroiled in a civil war as the supporters of the PLO tried to overthrow the Christian government of Lebanon.   There are lessons of the past that people are not paying attention to.

   I clipped this from Michael Smith.

The so-called “Michigan Problem” is no longer confined to Dearborn and Hamtramck. What began as a localized electoral headache for American Democrats—Arab and Muslim voters in a pivotal swing state bolting over Gaza and progressive social policies—has become a transatlantic crisis. In the United Kingdom and across the European Union, left-of-center parties confront an identical fracture: once-reliable Muslim blocs, imported through decades of migration and refugee resettlement, are abandoning them and running their own candidates or supporting alternatives.

The trigger is often foreign policy, but the deeper fault line is religious and cultural. Socially conservative Islamic values on sex, gender, family, and speech clash irreconcilably with the modern left’s progressive orthodoxy. As it turns out, conservative Americans are liberal compared to the “conservative values” in Islam. For decades, progressive Democrats conjured straw men to represent conservative Republicans. Now they don’t need to—they imported them.

The result is a coalition trap that neither side of the Atlantic has solved, exposing the failure of multiculturalism when assimilation is optional.

In Michigan, the problem crystallized in 2024. Biden’s staunch support for Israel amid Gaza—framed by many local voters as enabling genocide—ignited protest. The “Abandon Biden” and “Listen to Michigan” campaigns turned the primary into a referendum. Kamala Harris watched Biden’s 2020 margins evaporate. Trump, who visited Dearborn and promised Middle East peace, captured roughly 42 percent in key Arab-American precincts, flipping the state.

But foreign policy was never the sole driver. Pew Research in 2025 revealed U.S. Muslims are far closer to Republicans than Democrats on core social questions: 55 percent believe homosexuality should be discouraged by society versus just 13 percent of Democrats, and 48 percent view growing transgender acceptance as a change for the worse. In Dearborn schools and Hamtramck’s city council—which upheld a ban on Pride flags into 2025—Muslim parents and officials pushed back against LGBTQ curricula and symbols with a rigidity contemporary Christianity rarely matches. Other polls indicate Muslims are significantly more rigidly observant and unforgiving than traditional Republicans, counter to what most Democrats believe. Democrats now face a brutal choice: alienate their progressive base by softening on gender and sexuality, or watch a once-solid demographic swing permanently.

Across the Atlantic, the scale is larger and the stakes existential. British Muslims, numbering about 4 million or 6 percent of the population, delivered Labour landslide margins for decades. In 2024, that loyalty shattered. In seats where Muslims comprise more than a third of voters, Labour’s share plunged 29 points—from 65 percent in 2019 to 36 percent. Pro-Gaza independents and Greens scooped up the difference. By March 2026, British Election Study data showed the 2019-era 80 percent Muslim support for Labour had collapsed entirely. Ongoing Gaza hostilities, combined with domestic flashpoints—UK school protests against LGBTQ lessons mirroring Dearborn’s—have kept the wound open. Labour’s attempt at tighter immigration under a Muslim Home Secretary has only deepened the alienation. The Starmer government now fears the very people they need to keep them in power, as deportation and remigration fever begins to catch hold.

The EU version is more explosive still. In France, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Belgium, Muslim populations—often 6-10 percent nationally, 20-40 percent in urban enclaves like Seine-Saint-Denis, Malmö, or Molenbeek—were cultivated as multicultural shock troops for the left. The 2015 migrant wave and subsequent chain migration amplified the bloc. Gaza protests in 2023-2025 accelerated defection, but the underlying rupture is cultural. Polling across France, Germany, and the Netherlands shows Muslim respondents significantly more opposed to same-sex adoption and more supportive of traditional gender roles than native majorities.

Sweden now openly declares “Islam must adapt,” revoking residency permits and pushing repatriation after years of no-go zones and gang violence. In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders rode anti-Islam sentiment to power. Germany’s AfD leads national polls in 2026; France’s National Rally under Jordan Bardella remains a presidential threat. Native backlash has produced what analysts call the “center’s collapse”: welfare strains, parallel societies enforcing informal Sharia on speech and sexuality, and grooming scandals that shattered public trust.

The similarities are stark. In both America and Europe, Gaza served as the detonator—exposing how left parties’ reflexive defense of Israel betrayed a demographic they assumed was locked in by welfare and anti-racism rhetoric. More fundamentally, Islamic social conservatism—rigid on premarital sex, homosexuality, gender fluidity, blasphemy, and family hierarchy—collides with progressive dogma far more violently than modern Christianity does. Contemporary Western Christians have largely accommodated or secularized; many Muslim communities, especially first- and second-generation immigrants from conservative regions, have not. Left parties are paralyzed: moderating on Pride education or free speech risks their urban secular base; doubling down risks hemorrhaging the very minorities they championed. The double bind is identical on both continents.

Yet contrasts matter. America’s Michigan Problem remains containable—Muslims are under 2 percent nationally, concentrated in a handful of swing-state precincts. Europe’s crisis is systemic. Higher migrant fertility rates plus continued inflows project Muslim shares doubling or tripling by mid-century in several countries. Enclaves function as de facto parallel societies, multiparty fragmentation splinters the left, and populist right surges on explicit anti-Islam platforms. Native working-class voters, once Labour or Social Democrat stalwarts, have fled to AfD, National Rally, or Sweden Democrats over crime, housing, and cultural erosion. The welfare state magnifies resentment; visible Islamization—halal-only schools, honor violence, blasphemy demands—makes denial impossible.

This is no accident of bad luck. It is the predictable collision of mass, unvetted migration from illiberal societies with a host culture that abandoned assimilation for celebration of difference. Progressives sold multiculturalism as enrichment; reality delivered imported theocracies-lite that reject core liberal tenets on individual liberty and equality.

Democrats may yet paper over Michigan with targeted concessions or new candidates. Europe, however, risks permanent transformation: either endless appeasement that erodes Enlightenment values, or populist revolts that fracture the continent further. The left’s greatest fear is being realized—not that offending Muslim voters will spread, but that pretending the religious and cultural chasm does not exist will doom their entire project.

Ignoring the Michigan Problem did not make it disappear. Importing it at scale has only made the fracture continental.