Webster

The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)


Monday, October 26, 2020

Monday Music "Already Gone" By The Eagles

   I am continuing my string of "bugaloo" songs.  This discussion was started in the "Monster Hunter Nation, Hunters Unite", back in December? it is a Facebook group with enthusiast of the ILOH "International Lord of Hate" A.K.A Larry Correia.  We were talking about what song would we use if we looked out of our window or glanced at our security camera and saw this.....



One of the alphabet bois lining up to take down your house...What would be your "Valhalla" song and you would set it up to play as you load up magazines and prepare yourself.
 I figured it would scar the alphabet boys if they come busting in and hearing a song that is related good music in the 1980's unlike that crap they listen to now.  What can I say, My humor is warped....just a bit. Next week will be "Run Run Away" by Slade ,  Now that should really cause some psych evals., hehehe, some poor ATF guy trying to explain the attraction to his mother because he has the hots for a bunch of guys singing about Beaches and surfing and relaxing and having a good time...but well it IS ATF you know....and they ain't normal.

 I decided to roll with Eagles "Already Gone".  I touched on this last week with it being a great driving song....especially with the windows open and the music blaring.  the song reminds me of driving in the southland on a country road.   In my heart I am a country boy, I do not want to live in the city, I am not a city dweller...being trapped inside a city if things go "pear-shaped" definitely is not a comfortable feeling.  I would jam with this song especially when I was in Germany stationed at Cooke Barracks and this song would come on my cassette player and I would turn it up LOUD and sing along with the song and make the Germans wonder ;)  One of the memories of this song was being on the autobahns rolling in my Mustang and jamming with this song.  Really good memories.
\

The License Plate in top came off my Mustang from the 1980's while I was stationed in Cooke Barracks In Germany  then at Stuttgart Army Airfield. In Germany, the one on the bottom came off my parents Ford Granada from the 1970's while we were stationed in Frankfurt in the mid 70's.  Yes I have a collection of License plates in my Garage.



"Already Gone" is a song recorded by the American rock band Eagles for their 1974 album On the Border. It was written by Jack Tempchin and Robb Strandlund and produced by Bill Szymczyk.
The song was the first single released from On the Border and peaked at #32 on the Billboard Hot 100. Since then, the Eagles have included it on their greatest hits albums and in their live performances. Tanya Tucker and Wilson Phillips have covered the song.


"Already Gone", which is four minutes and 13 seconds long, was written by Robb Strandlund and Jack Tempchin. In the liner notes for The Very Best OfGlenn Frey said that Tempchin sent him a tape of the song through the mail. Tempchin had already written one of the Eagles' previous singles, "Peaceful Easy Feeling".
"Already Gone" was one of the first songs that the Eagles recorded after they moved to Los Angeles, and it was produced by Bill Szymczyk. Frey was the lead vocalist

"Already Gone" is the opening track of the Eagles' album On the Border, which was released by Asylum Records on March 22, 1974. It was released as the first single from the album in April 1974. Its b-side was "Is It True".
The song has also been included on some of the Eagles' compilation albums, including Their Greatest Hits (1971–1975) and The Very Best Of

"Already Gone" has been described as a "classic". In his book To the Limit: The Untold Story of the Eagles, Marc Eliot wrote that the song "was an out-and-out rocker ... Musically it sounded like a fuel-injected rave-up, with melodic echoes of both 'Peaceful Easy Feeling' and 'Take It Easy.




Sunday, October 25, 2020

20 Reasons Objectionist and Libertarians should vote for Donald Trump.

 I shamelessly *nicked* this off my Farcebook feed this morning, I went to do a Boy Scout Shooting event with them yesterday and sight in my new rifle, what an adventure it was yesterday and a story for a future blogpost, but not today.

This is from the "SavvyStreet.com and it was very good 




I became a tepid Trump supporter early in the 2016 campaign. He did not seem ideological on issues like climate change, energy exploration and fracking, “good” racial quotas, and “reining in” Wall Street—to mention a few. The right ideology is best; the wrong ideology is worst. A businessman unabashedly proud of his wealth, spending guiltlessly, enthusiastically heterosexual, boastful about American exceptionalism, apparently uninterested or excited about identity politics, and snapping the whip at the mainstream media (MSM) seemed good enough for me. What sold me was when the left MSM abandoned all standards of journalism, or even decency, to destroy him. Obviously it was not for his playboy-ish private life. The media pines for neo-Marxist ideology. They use any means, including unjustified personal attacks to advance it. If Trump horrified them, there was perhaps even more potential than I saw.

The Mt. Rushmore speech alone shows his understanding of America’s enemies has progressed and should convince freedom lovers of his value. But actions speak louder than words.

Indeed, there was. Through a campaign about as civil as an Indian gantlet, which made me want to hide in a hole, Donald Trump remained energetic, positive, and incredibly managed to take the media attacks for what they were worth—and solve the problem by … tweeting. When he claimed his stunning upset victory, and I saw the media reaction, I became positively enthusiastic. I published Donald Trump and His Enemies: How the Media Put Trump in Office.

Fast-forwarding, now, as the next four years wore on I published an informal series on Facebook called “The ‘What-Is-Worth-to-You?’ Department.” It featured each action, each comment, of the president that made me even happier that I voted for him. An example not given below, but in the same “Department,” was his speech on July 4, 2020, at Mt. Rushmore. That alone shows his understanding of America’s enemies has progressed and should convince freedom lovers of his value. But actions speak louder than words.
 
So, here are the 20 reasons, based on actions, why objectivists and libertarians should vote for Donald Trump in 2020:

  1. To win the 2016 election, he dog sledded through a storm of smears, and every variation on identity politics. He did not falter. He was out campaigning on election eve. At the time, and since, the wild accusations of 2016, one by one, have been refuted. The left liberal press does not care and does not even make corrections, let alone apologize.
  2. Arriving in office, he immediately withdrew America from the Paris Accords, the doomsday machine invented by the international anti-industrial revolution. Why didn’t objectivists, who better than any other philosophical group understand climate alarmism’s neo-Marxist roots, rejoice?
  3. From 2017, he started to remove constraints on fracking, artic wildlife area drilling, pipelines stalled in regulatory agencies. In fact, he has imposed, in four years, not one new constraint on energy exploration and development.
  4. He appointed a Secretary of Education committed to school choice and vouchers and the department has sued universities for racial quotas. The department revoked the Obama era unfair constraints on public school teachers responding to attacks by students.
  5. Not one peep has passed his lips about any proposed law or regulation, to “restrain Wall Street excesses.” Wall Street firms are also big contributions for Democratic candidates, while themselves benefiting from the Fed’s excesses. Little wonder then, that they allow the metonym “Wall Street” to be a symbol of evil.
  6. Heard about any “bold new initiatives” to regulate anything? (Yes, if you count renegotiating trade agreements Trump justifiably views as one-sided.) After a brief initial plunge driven by state-initiated lockdowns, the stock market has risen to new records throughout the COVID-19 crisis, arguably due to the Fed’s QE expansion. But the markets also hate political uncertainty. Except for renegotiated international trade treaties and COVID-19 rescue packages, Trump has introduced none into the future of business.
  7. While paying lip service to the repeal of Roe v Wade—without which you can forget about running for president as a Republican—Trump has nominated and fought for Supreme Court justices who are literalist and originalist about the U.S. Constitution. The record of Trump nominees to the Court is silent on Roe v Wade. Including Amy Coney Barrett. Don’t trust CNN, read Barrett’s responses to Senator Blumenthal on this issue.
  8. Trump has declared that his best advisor on Communist China is Michael Pillsbury, author of The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower. That may be the most prescient and promising Trump choice for the future of America. Pillsbury has moved from a China dove to a China hawk. His book, I believe, can convince any freedom lover that the China threat (to America, not just her own citizens), is serious.
  9. Faced with the coronavirus pandemic, President Trump chose constraint, not powers under a super-activist national emergency mandate. The champion of activism, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, locked down the state’s economy, devastating businesses. An estimated half of NYC restaurants and bars shut down will never reopen. Yet, with six percent of the population of the United States, New York State has had some 20 percent of COVID-19 deaths.
  10. As this most infectious virus since the Spanish flu epidemic in 1918, most likely of Chinese origin, keeps spreading, President Trump is blamed for not assuming powers no president in the history of America has grabbed, in essence, for not being autocratic! He is vilified daily for somehow causing 200,000 deaths in America.
  11.  

  12. No political figure yet has spoken to, and treated, the mainstream media as what it has become like Trump has. He ignored advice of those in office to conciliate the media at all costs (“In the end, they will get you!”). Thanks to social media (Twitter), Trump can reach tens of millions of supporters almost instantly, without the mediation of the media. The response of the “free press”? Cries for censorship (a.k.a., “regulation”) of social media. Their efforts have paid off with widespread suppression of the NY Post Hunter Biden story.
  13. The left mainstream media proclaimed President Trump an enemy of identity politics: Black Lives Matter, racial quotas in higher education, and excuse-making for riots, arson, and attacks on police as “protest.” He is endlessly smeared as “racist,” “white nationalist,” for “white supremacy …” … He seems unfazed. He keeps tweeting–enraging those from every quarter from CNN to Hollywood who would bury him in opprobrium.
  14. Donald Trump is the most consistent ally of the State of Israel since at least Richard Nixon. His actionable steps such moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, have been policy—not rhetoric He is the first president in decades not to pressure­­ Israel to make concessions of territory to the Palestinian side.
  15. President Trump is immune to the postmodernism that is pandemic in U.S. colleges, progressively taking hold of new generations. A key tenet of postmodernism is that all politics pits “oppressor” against the “oppressed.” Through the lens of Marxist attacks on capitalism, the oppressors and oppressed are capitalists and proletarians. For the postmodernist/neo-Marxists, the divide is more primitive: race, sex, and ethnicity.
  16. Where there is violence, President Trump sees … violence. It is that simple. But postmodern sees the clash of races, sexes, and ethnic groups as the oppressed battles the oppression (e.g., “systemic racism) and so when Black Lives Matter, university students who disagree with speakers, or protestors angry at the election results initiate violence and clash with police, the postmodernists in the media and politics say: well, violence begets violence, you know. President Trump demands law and order, challenges Democratic governors and mayors to restore civility, and sends in federal forces.
  17. Political opposition to President Trump since 2016—including, of course, the Democratic Party organs like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Atlantic—has taken the form of attempts to use the justice system to expel him from office. Attacks on the Electoral College, appointment of a special prosecutor, impeachment hearings, allegations of criminal misconduct (the Trump tax return farce): All are avenues that avoid ideas, political positions, arguments. The attack on the Electoral College gave way to street violence at the inauguration; the special prosecutor did not recommend any prosecution; and the impeachment hearings could not turn a phone call into a conviction for “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
  18. Candidate Trump, and then President Trump, staged a dramatic breakout from the president’s symbiotic relationship with the media He seized on internet communications technology to bypass the media monopoly, tweeting to tens of millions of supporters daily. It has almost driven those suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome over the edge. “Tweeting! My, God, tweeting! Instead of reading my column in the NYT!” And the other eight columns on the same page creatively varying their daily attacks on the President.
  19. And then, President Trump seemed to fall into the pit trap with the sharpened stakes. He and Melania tested positive for COVID-19. Oh, the smug, over-confident, optimistic SOBs! This is their just desserts! And just in time for the election! Gotcha! No masks! The arrogance! No one, of course, should minimize the suffering of Americans and those worldwide who have contracted, and all-too-often died, from this vicious infectious epidemic—and the families who have had to bear the loss. But the cheering of the Trump haters when the President and First Lady—exposed as how many others might be—fell ill was shocking to see. It exposed not political disagreement but a hate utterly visceral. What had Trump done to the media to justify this savage glee? Won in 2016 despite their attacks that in the end jettisoned all standards of journalism, even decency. Remained in office as attack after attack faltered and failed. And, well, remained just “Trump” as four years of attacks that could have smothered him like an avalanche rolled over him.
  20. The most crucial thing about Donald Trump are his enemies. You may not admire him like I do, but he is far and away the lesser evil from an objectivist or libertarian lens. Donald Trump is not Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln (still, check out how they were attacked!) But his enemies are the advancing mobs of the Far-Left revolution. They are rising Democratic stars like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Kamala Harris. They are dirty-mouthed Hollywood celebs, one of whom said that when he heard President Trump and the First Lady had tested positive Covid-19, he “jumped in the air and clapped my hands.” We all know this. The obscene late-night comedians. The network news anchors who “lose it” and expose their bias. What do Donald Trump’s enemies have in common? They embrace the “politically correct” as quasi-religious dogma. They hate fossil fuels. They hate America. They are neo-Marxists intent on a fascist, new world order.
  21. Last but not the least, Trump has been maligned in libertarian and objectivist circles as an autocrat who attacks free speech. The exact opposite is true. Trump is not bullying social media. He is championing a bill, the intent of which is to stop social media being bullied by the mainstream media to make them conform to neo-Marxist narratives. You may well question the practical and legal effectiveness of this strategy. But Trump’s heart is in the right place. For free speech.

 

You may not admire him like I do, but he is far and away the lesser evil from an objectivist or libertarian lens.

I kept to the positive surprises (for me) in this list. But there have been many, many more. But the list scarcely touches on the point that initially got me interested in Trump. It is expressed in the phrase “Donald Trump and His Enemies.” You look now at the rapidly approaching election and the marquee of adversaries, featuring Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. But look at those others who attack the President, on what grounds, and the level of discourse they permit themselves. It is as though they all have Tourette Syndrome in addition to Trump Derangement Disorder. Increasingly, I believe our President—born and bred in the rough-and-tumble, two-fisted, in-your-face New York real-estate world—has in his own way a kind of dignity, courage, and self-confidence. Can you imagine? A rich, white man … unapologetically patriotic?

Donald Trump: he has his nerve!

 

Friday, October 23, 2020

Some Musings and thoughts......

 I ran across this video and it is really powerful.

Apparently the Biden/Harris campaign decided to bring out the gun control issue close to the election after seeing record gun sales because people seeing their cities being destroyed by leftist agitators and the police unable to stop them forced many people to realize for the first time that they are responsible for their own defense.  My good friend, the purveyor of gun knowledge, lover of plastic fantastic and aficionado of hooter calendars and all around good guy Mack  had been reporting record sales at his establishment from newbie gun buyers.  The newest thing the Biden people are pushing is registration of all AR pattern rifles, $200 per rifle, plus magazines plus ammo and put it all under the NCA which was the gun control act that was pushed through in 1934 that made machine guns illegal.  I really thought the democrats would realize that gun control was a dead issue the next few year, after watching their fellow foot solders of Soros run rampant through all these blue cities kinda pushed that point home. Now they are doubling down on stupid and pushing this.  Many people know that registration leads to confiscation and they ain't going to register nothing......I remember a line from a Soviet Dissident in the 1930's during the Purges when Stalin's NKVD, his secret police was hauling people out of their homes in the middle of the night, and 1/4 of the population of Leningrad vanished into the Gulag system or just "vanished", he made a quote that would be appropriate here...


Also Robert Reich the Former Clinton labor Commissioner wants to form a "Reconciliation Commission" after the election should Biden win to punish then integrate Trump supporters back into society....this really gives me the chills.  When did we start taking lessons from 3rd world banana republic and Pol Pot?.  This is frightening stuff, We cannot have a dissenting opinion from the liberalgrouphivethink without being punished for it? This is the anthesis of Freedom?   We fought several wars over this kinda stuff.  Then to have someone want to set up a commission to punish their fellow Americans for having a different opinion?  You want to Kick off a Boogaloo, this will kick off a boogaloo.  Americans are nastier at war than anybody else.  You start wanting to punish your neighbors? Sent them off to a camp? take their stuff as "Reparation's"?   You know how that is going to go..


You betcha sport, your fellow citizens ain't going to willingly step into the boxcar, the cattlecar, the bus to go to a camp to be "reeducated".  I really don't see that happening, good luck with that thought..

 Meanwhile the Hunter Biden Emails have hit the news and the Mainstream Media has done a stellar job of....



Pretty much.........Now if it had been anything on President Trump?....It would have been Front Page News and dominating the news cycle....and more people are realizing the bias and the reputation of the news media is hovering around used car salesman and telemarketers. 


Yep Farcebook and Twatter shot themselves in the foot, they tried to shield their chosen candidate and did it so poorly like a bull in a china shop it literally blew back on them so that even the leftist that ain't suffering from TDS are pissed at them because they know that if those organizations will choke down a story like that, what other stories have been throttled down in the past that people don't know about...it has opened a can of worms that the ham fisted tech companies screwed the pooch in their zeal to stick it to the "hated cheeto man". 

Like I said, the Election is coming closer and you will have to choose....






Thursday, October 22, 2020

The U.S. Army Quest for a Modern Semiautomatic Pistol.

 I snagged the article off American Rifleman, it gave more background on Old NFO favorite pistol and more information than the lore that was common knowledge that I remembered reading as a kid about the Moro rebellion in the Philippines.  The Pics are compliments of "Google" and my "stash" on my computer. 




He came out of nowhere. He was yelling and charging straight for the American patrol. He stood a little over five and a half feet tall but to the soldiers he looked like a monster twelve feet tall. He brandished a long knife, which he wickedly held in his right hand. The patrol reacted immediately and several of the soldiers scored hits from their bolt action, Springfield rifles. But he wouldn't go down. He just kept coming at them. He was about ready to slash at the soldiers when a lucky shot to his head brought him down. After the fight the soldiers turned the dead warrior over. He had twelve neat little holes in him, but only the lucky shot had stopped him.



Here was a new enemy – the Moro Juramentado. Armed with a sword known as the Kris or a hacking knife called the Barong, they were a formidable enemy. They were unlike any other enemy the Americans had encountered. Having used a special herbal drug that made them impervious to pain and with their bodies bound up like a giant tourniquet so that they would not easily bleed out, they would charge and attack until they were dead. The Moro Juramentado never retreated or surrendered. The Americans, following the European trend toward smaller caliber weapons brought their .30 caliber Springfield rifles and their .38 caliber revolvers. They soon learned that the stopping power of the .38 was not sufficient to stop a Juramentado.

The army needed a more powerful weapon. The army decided against the European trend toward smaller caliber pistols and decided upon a larger caliber pistol with more stopping power for close encounters. Here is the story behind the Browning/Colt 45.

From the beginning of the American Civil War and into the 20th Century the United States Army supplied its troops with several different caliber and manufactures of revolvers. Most of the Army's revolvers were manufactured by the Colt's Patent Firearms Manufacturing Company. While it appears that Colt had a monopoly on revolvers, the Army would also purchase revolvers from other manufactures including Smith and Wesson.

At the beginning of the American Civil War many different rifles, muskets and pistols were used. Eventually the North settled on the Colt Army Model 1860, in .44 caliber for the Army and the Colt Navy Model 1861 in .36 caliber for the Navy. The South preferred the Colt 1851 Navy Revolver in .36 caliber.

All of these revolvers used black powder as the propellant and the user had to hand load powder and ball directly into the cylinders of each gun and then add a percussion cap on the outside of the cylinders to fire each chamber. Basically, during a battle, the soldier would have 6 shots, since it would be impossible to reload.

After the Civil War, soldiers got what was left of the Civil War weapons to use to protect the Wild West. These guns were old and obsolete. To correct this problem the army purchased the Colt Model 1873 “Peacemaker” .45 caliber revolver. This was a well designed revolver using cartridge bullets making it easier to reload. Each bullet was inserted separately and then the cylinder was rotated by hand for the next bullet. If a spent shell had to be removed, that was done first before inserting the new bullet. Depending on the battle situation, again the soldier may have only 6 shots since it might be impossible to reload under combat conditions.

This would be especially true for cavalry units. Trying to reload the Colt 45 would have been next to impossible while mounted on a charging horse. To correct this problem Major George W. Schofield of the 10th Cavalry, asked Smith and Wesson to modify their Model No. 3 for the army. The modified revolvers were named the Schofield. The major advantage this revolver had over the Colt 45 was that it was a top break pistol which when it opened, would automatically eject all of the spent shell casings, leaving it easily accessible to reload. A good cavalryman could reload the Schofield in 26 seconds without looking. The Schofield's began entering service in 1875. Like the Colt 45, the Schofield had a seven inch long barrel, but surplus guns usually had the barrel shortened to five inches.


Stories abound that if Lt. Colonel George Armstrong Custer‘s troops at the battle of the Little Big Horn on June 25, 1876, had used the Schofield they would have won the engagement. It is unknown what revolver Lt. Colonel Custer personally used. It is thought he may have used a pair of solid-frame Webley First Model Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) revolvers in .442 caliber, presented to him by British sportsman Lord Berkeley Paget. It's also possible he used the Colt 45 or his .50-70 Remington rifle. It would not have made a difference. He did not have a defensible position and a ready supply of ammunition. He was badly outnumbered 15 to 1 by the Lakota Sioux and the Cheyenne warriors. [1]


Pistols such as the Colt 45. the Schofield and all the rest of the pistols are basically a close range weapons to be used on a target less than sixty feet distant.[2] A good seven inch long barrel pistol has an effective range of about 20 yards away, although it has stopping power if it hit anything out to 100 yards and beyond. A good marksman can hit a target at 100 yards but not on the battlefield. Even at 50 yards it's questionable, if a soldier could accurately hit a target. Twenty yards would be the maximum effective range on the battlefield. During the fury of battle, it would be impossible to be patient for any length of time to take a single shot.

A short barrel Colt 45 (usually 5”) was effective to about 7 yards and old west shootouts between fast draw gunmen usually occurred at this distance or less. The shopkeepers model with a three inch barrel was only good for dozen feet at best and there was a good chance you would hit a customer instead of the thief. Again, with the enemy so close it would be impossible to reload any pistol, including the Schofield, before the enemy was upon the soldiers. In the Philippines and especially in the trench warfare of World War One a bolt action rifle would be too long and too slow to rapid fire. A large caliber, quick reloading pistol with at least a 5” barrel would be ideal. While the army had settled on the Colt 45 and the Schofield, individuals outside of the army had their choice of weapons. In seems like in every old western movie the cowboy used a Colt 45. This was not always the case. There were many weapons to choose from both foreign and American made. These included some of the following:

1. Prescott single action six-shot revolver in .38 caliber
2. Merwin & Hulbert open top revolver which had competed against the Colt 45 for the army contract
3. Remington Model 1890 single action revolver
4. Smith and Wesson's No. 3 Model Army pistol in .44 caliber
5. Colt single action revolver in 44-40 caliber

Guns favored by outlaws were also varied. John Wesley Hardin used a .41 caliber Colt Lightning. This weapon was also favored by William H. Bonney aka “Billy the Kid.” Frank James used a Colt 45 and later the Remington Model 1875 in .44-40 caliber. Pancho Vila used many different weapons including a Remington single action revolver, but his favorites were the Colt 1881 in .44-40 caliber and the Colt Bisley also in .44-40 caliber. Both Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid used the Colt 45. In contrast Charles Boles aka “Black Bart” used a Loomis No. 15 shotgun to rob Wells Fargo stage coaches. Legend has it that the shotgun was never loaded.

On the “law” keeping side of the old west, James Butler “Wild Bill” Hickok used a Colt Model 1851 Navy .36 Caliber with ivory grips He also was known to use a Smith & Wesson .32 and a Dean-Adams five shot .45 DA revolver. Later in life with his eyesight failing it is said he carried a scatter gun. Doc Holiday with Wyatt Earp at the O.K. Corral, used a Colt 45. Doc Holiday started the engagement with a shotgun then followed up with his revolver. John Clum, editor of the Tombstone Epitaph and Mayor of Tombstone, preferred the Colt single action .44-40 caliber as did Pat Garrett when he shot and killed Billy the Kid. Bat Masterson used a specially modified 1885 Colt 45.

While the Colt 45 and the Schofield were good weapons, it was felt that the American Army was lagging behind developments in Europe. To modernize the Army, it was decided to follow the European practice for rifles and pistols using higher velocity, smaller caliber bullets with smokeless powder. This would lighten the weight of the gun and allow the soldier to carry more ammunition for the same weight. In 1892, the US Military adopted the Colt double action revolver with a swing out cylinder in .38 Colt long caliber. This gun was modified several times over the next few years.


The Colt 1892 was a lethal weapon and served the army well during the Spanish American War.[3] A later model of this revolver, the Colt 1895, was carried by Teddy Roosevelt when his Rough Riders stormed San Juan Hill in Cuba. Teddy Roosevelt used this revolver to shoot and kill two Spanish soldiers. He was later awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions that day. This revolver had originally been salvaged from the sunken USS Maine battleship and was presented to him by his brother-in-law Theodore Douglas Robinson, who was responsible for salvaging the Maine.


With the end of the Spanish American War, a new threat to the US Military arose in the Philippines. Expecting to be granted their freedom, the Philippine people rebelled against the United States for not granting it. The Army treated this like any other problem with native people. They had subdued Sitting Bull, Cochise, Geronimo, American Horse and Chief Joseph [4], but they soon learned that they had a different type of enemy that they had never faced before.

The Colt 1892 would not stop a charging Moro Juramentado. To correct this problem the army sent the old Colt 45 over to the Philippines. This weapon could stop a charging Juramentado, but it was a throwback to a different era. Once again European armies were switching over to the semiautomatic pistol, which could carry 7 or 8 bullets in a detachable magazine making it quick to reload. As early as 1894, the army was approached by European manufacturers to purchase a semiautomatic pistol. The army needed a semiautomatic pistol, but were unsure in what caliber. European armies were settling on the 9mm size bullet or even smaller calibers.

The chart below show the relative qualities of various size bullets.

NameCase Length
in inches
Case Diameter
in inches
Bullet Weight
in Grains [5]
Velocity at Muzzle In
feet per second
Energy at Muzzle
in foot pounds
Energy at 100 yards
in foot pounds
.38 special [6]1.1550.357100 (0.251)995242185
9mm automatic0.7540.355115 (0.262)1155391241
Colt .45 “Peace Maker”1.2850.452225 (0.514)920423352
Browning/Colt .45 automatic0.8980.451185 (0.422)1000411324


The chart above shows the comparative stopping power of the Colt 45 [7], the .38 special, 9mm and the Browning/Colt 45 automatic. What is important is the comparison of the size and weight of the bullets. The Browning/Colt bullet is 21% bigger in size and 38% heavier than the 9mm bullet. It will produce much more damage when it hits a target.

To resolve this issue of which caliber to adopt, Colonel John T. Thompson of the Infantry, and Major Louis Anatole LaGarde of the Medical Corps tested many different caliber of bullets. Their report convinced the army to choose the .45 caliber ACP bullet. It had the best stopping power in a semiautomatic pistol. The .45 caliber ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) bullet was designed by John Browning, in 1904, for his .45 caliber automatic pistol he was developing.

Now that the bullet's caliber had been chosen, a pistol was needed to fire it. In the 1906 trials, six companies, Colt, Bergmann, Deutsche Waffen und Munitionsfabriken (DWM), Savage Arms Company, Knoble, Webley, and White-Merril, competed for the contract. Only two made it to the finals the Colt model designed by John Browning and the Savage model. The final test was to have each pistol continuously fire 6000 rounds over the course of two days. When the guns began to grow hot, they were simply immersed in water to cool them. The Colt passed with no reported malfunctions, while the Savage design had 37.

The new Browning/Colt was adopted by the Army in 1916. It was first used in combat the same year during the Mexican Revolution.


The new Browning/Colt 45, officially called the M1911, proved the design of the pistol and the stopping power of the .45 caliber bullet in the trench warfare of World War One. It was soon known as a “trench sweeper” for its stopping power – a soldier only had to use one bullet per enemy encountered instead of two or more to stop the enemy. It was also easy and fast to reload since the bullets were housed in a magazine that could be ejected and a new one inserted in just seconds. Outside of the trenches the M1911 saw a lot of use. Sargent Alvin York used it to stop six charging German soldiers with six shots. He was awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions. Also Lieutenant Frank Luke of the army Air Corps. was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his fight to the death for the defense of his downed Spad aircraft from a German assault on his position.


The M1911 and its variants served the United States Military from World War One, through World War Two, The Korean Conflict and into the Vietnam War and is still in use today.

Footnotes


[1]. The Battle of the Little Big Horn took place on June 25, 1876. This can be compared to the Battle of Isandlwana between the British Army and the Zulus in Zulu Land, South Africa on January 22, 1879. The British at Isandlwana were outnumbered, had indefensible positions and the soldiers were not close to the ammunition supply, and as the story goes, the supply sergeant was slow in giving out the ammunition. In contrast the battle at Rourke's Drift fought a few hours latter saw the British more heavily outnumbered but they won the day, since they had defensible positions and the ammunition was readily available.

[2]. The effective range of any firearm is determined by many factors. The soldier's training and combat experience is a major factor. But there are many other factors. The length of the barrel is one such item. The longer the barrel the more contact the bullet has with the rifling (inner groves) which cause the bullet to spin thus stabilizing it as it leaves the barrel. While a very long barrel sounds great, the friction of the bullet going down the barrel would degrade performance as it leaves the barrel and the length may become unwieldy to use. Other factors that influence the trajectory of the bullet include gravity, air resistance, air temperature and wind. Most of these factors only come into play in long distance shooting. The longest recorded sniper kill was made by Corporal of Horse (CoH) Craig Harrison, Household Cavalry (UK) in November 2009 in Afghanistan using a Accuracy International L115A3 rifle for a distance of 2,707 yards.

[3]. While the Spanish Navy was obsolete and easily defeated, the Spanish Army had some of the latest in European weapons. This included the Spanish Model M1893 or Spanish Mauser, the Mauser C96 (German Luger) in 7.63mm, and the Mauser ZigZag, 9mm, single action, top break revolver.

[4]. While it may appear that the US Army had a string of victories against Native American warriors, such is not the case. Final victory usually came after many defeats and setbacks. Native Americans fought with courage, bravery and skill and many times out fought and out witted the army. They were defeated by a combination of one or more of the following: disease, shortages of food, lack of modern weapons, lack of a steady supply of ammunition, lack of an endless supply of warriors/soldiers and the need to protect family members.

[5]. The weight of a bullet is measured in grains. Ounces are shown in parentheses to give the non-shooter a sense of comparison.

[6]. The .38 Special was introduced in 1898 as an improvement over the .38 Long Colt which, as a military service cartridge, was found to have inadequate stopping power against the charges of Moro warriors during the Philippine–American War. Despite its name, the caliber of the .38 Special cartridge is actually .357–.358 inches (9.0678 mm), with the ".38" referring to the approximate diameter of the loaded brass case. This came about because the original .38-caliber cartridge, the .38 Short Colt, was designed for use in converted .36-caliber cap-and-ball (muzzleloading) Navy revolvers, which had cylindrical firing chambers of approximately 0.374-inch (9.5 mm) diameter, requiring heeled bullets, the exposed portion of which was the same diameter as the cartridge case.” For more information go to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.38_Special#cite_note-cotw-5

[7]. The Schofield .45 caliber pistol used a bullet casing, which was shorter than the Colt 45. Since it had less powder, it's muzzle velocity was only 730 feet per second and it's energy at the muzzle was 276 foot pounds a little better than a .38 special. The Schofield bullet could be fired out of the Colt 45 but the Colt 45 bullet was too long to fit in the Schofield.