I decided to post this comparison of the 03 Springfield, the M-1 Garand and the Lee Enfield. Since I have all 3 of these rifles, I thought it would be humorous.
Back to Front, my 308 Enfield, my 03A3 Springfield and my 303 Enfield.
My Garand and my 03A3 on the way to the range
My Garand and my 03A3
My Enfield. I have blogged about the Enfield several times, the Enfield was finally retired by the Canadians last year, the only rifle to be in active service over a 100 years.
All 3 of the rifles are totally different and they all have plusses and Minuses. I have a Mosin also
My Nagant, with the "Dog Collars" it is the carbine version.
I wouldn't mind getting an Ariska and a Mauser so basically I would have something from all the major combatants of WWII. Corny I know...Something about holding a piece of history in your hand.
This debate seems to have become a bloodless battle with no end in sight. However, in the video below, Paul Shull, the host of the Smithsonian Channel’s The Weapon Hunter show, takes a look at the two historic weapons with an exacting yet exciting shooting challenge before drawing his own personal verdict.
Before that though, a little background information on what the two weapons stand for, and what really made them stand out.
The M1903 Springfield, officially known as the United States Rifle, Caliber .30-06, Model 1903, served as the primary rifle of the United States military for the first several decades of the 20th century, seeing action in both World War I and II.
It was adopted as the US military’s official bolt-action rifle on June 19, 1930, but this rifle was basically a spin-off from the Spanish Mauser Model 1893. Due to the many similarities the Springfield had to the Mauser, the United States was forced to pay a hefty amount in royalties to the Mauser manufacturers.
Fed by a five-round magazine, the 8.7-pound bolt-action repeating rifle was met by the M1 Garand, which came as its official replacement. However, the Springfield remained the standard issue rifle for the doughboys owing to insufficient supply of M1 Garand rifles.
The Springfield rifle was also extensively used by American snipers during WWII, and its usage continued past the Korean War into the early stages of the Vietnam War.
The M1903 Springfield is revered among all for its exceptional level of accuracy. It is, in fact, often voted the most accurate sniper rifle of WWII.
It remains popular today among civilians, historical collectors, competitive shooters, and military drill teams.
On the other hand, the M1 Garand, named after its designer, John Garand, is a .30-06 caliber semi-automatic rifle. With over five million units built between 1934 and 1957, the M1 Garand was used in WWII, the Korean War, and also the Vietnam War where it found limited use.
The M1 Garand performed amazingly during its years of service, earning the praise of General George S. Patton who termed it “the greatest battle implement ever devised.”
Officially known by the US military as “U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1,” the rifle made its entrance into the war during the 1930s as a substitute for the M1903 Springfield.
Weighing 9.5 pounds, the legendary rifle served American troops in the battlefields of Northern France, taking them through the coasts of Okinawa, the scorching heat of North Africa, and the cruel humidity of the Philippines.
Owing to its impressive muzzle velocity, the M1 Garand handed a significant advantage to the Allied forces. In several ways, this 43.5-inch fast-firing war machine was extremely instrumental in bringing victory home to the Allies, as the bloodiest conflict in human history came to a close.
The M1 Garand saw a number of copies and derivatives, such as the Japanese Type 4 Rifle, the Italian Beretta Models, the US M14 Rifle, and the Ruger Mini-14.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I had to change the comment format on this blog due to spammers, I will open it back up again in a bit.