Part of the reason for the bloodbath of WWI, was that the tactics haven't kept up with weapon development. There was a taste of it in the U.S. Civil War that the Europeans discounted because it was being fought by the colonials and the average European looked down at the Americans and their military experience. The Germans and the French were considered the premier military power of the age. They also had discounted the British experience in the Boer wars with trench warfare which the American Civil war also demonstrated. The early part of WWI was fought with linear or Napoleonic tactics that haven't changed since Waterloo, but the weapons were far more deadly.
“The only real power comes out of a long rifle.” – Joseph Stalin.
During
WWI, millions of men were given rifles and sent into the trenches to
fight. They were the weapons that turned civilians into soldiers.
Machine-guns and artillery might have defined the war, but the rifle was
a soldier’s constant companion. On the Western Front in particular,
what made for a good rifle changed. Sitting in trenches for months at a
time, enduring the terrible weather, then fighting in rushed advances
and brutal close combat, men needed a rugged weapon that could take a
battering.
A high rate of fire was essential. The range was less
critical, guns needing to be accurate to 400 yards rather than the
pre-war goal of 800 yards. A short weapon was better, as it was easier
to wield in a confined trench. Did the leading weapons live up to those
standards?
Rifle No.1 Mk III
Going into the war, the British had a weapon that met the requirements.
Rifle
No.1 Mk III was the latest variation of the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield
Rifle, which had been brought into service in 1907. It had been
developed during the Boer War when the British found their standard
rifle too long for cavalry use. It led to a hybrid weapon whose
shortness proved valuable although the cavalry it was made for became
obsolete.
Although its rear-lug locking mechanism was, in theory,
weaker than those of some other weapons, it worked smoothly and gave
users minimal trouble. It’s smooth reliability allowed British soldiers
to achieve remarkably high rates of fire.
The magazine carried ten powerful 0.303-inch rounds.
Modifications
were made to the weapon, stripping away features meant for range and
precision. It made the rifle easier to produce, a vital factor when so
many men needed to be armed quickly. The resulting No.1 Mk III* was so
efficient it stayed in service throughout WWII
Springfield Model 1903
Like the No.1 Mk III, the American
Springfield Model 1903 was a compromise weapon, somewhere between a
traditional rifle and the carbines of the period. It had a Mauser
mechanism, the best available in the world, produced under license at
the Springfield Arsenal. As a result, it had a bolt action that was easy
to use. Nicely balanced, it was more accurate than most rifles of the
period, firing to target-shooting standards.
The Springfield had a
five-round box magazine carrying 0.3-inch caliber bullets. With a
muzzle velocity of 2,800 feet per second, it was more powerful than the
No.1Mk III, but not as fast firing.
Lebel Model 1886
Going
into WWI, the French suffered from the same problem they had in the
Franco-Prussian war 44 years before – their weapons were inferior to
those of their opponents.
The standard French weapon was the Lebel
Model 1886. As its name implies, it was older than the weapons of
France’s allies. Its tubular magazine, which carried 8mm caliber
bullets, was slow to load. At 13.4 inches long, it was over half a foot
longer than the Springfield and the No.1 Mk III. Its tendency to explode
made it a danger to its users.
Other French weapons had their
problems too. The Berthier Model 1907 added a box magazine to the Lebel,
but it still only held three rounds. The Berthier and Gras carbines
were shorter. Combined with powerful bullets it gave them excessive
muzzle flash, and like the Berthier 1907, they only had small magazines.
FN-Mauser Model 1895
The Belgian Fabrique Nationale went on to become one of the leading weapons manufacturers of the 20th century, but at the start of WWI, they were still finding their feet.
The
FN-Mauser Model 1895 was an unremarkable weapon, although an adequate
one for the ordinary Belgian infantryman. It was long, especially when
equipped with its large bayonet. Its five-round magazine carried
0.301-inch ammunition, almost the same as the British were firing.
Mosin-Nagant Model 1891
Before
Communist governments created a doctrine of mass mobilization, the
Russians were fielding a weapon suitable for that strategy. The
Mosin-Nagant Model 1891 was unexceptional but sturdy; a weapon that
could take a battering in the hands of inexperienced soldiers. Like the
FN-Mauser Model 1895, it was a relatively long weapon with a five-round
magazine. Its 7.62mm ammunition was slightly smaller than that of the
Belgian gun.
Fucile Modello 91
The
Fucile Modello 91, also known as the Mannlicher-Carcano, was the
standard weapon of the Italian army. It was another long weapon and an
underpowered one, firing 0.256-inch caliber bullets with a muzzle
velocity of 2,067 feet per second. Its only advantage was a six-round
box magazine.
Gewehr 98
Germany had a strong tradition of superior weaponry. They fielded one of the best rifles of the war.
The
Gewehr 98 was a Mauser creation. Its three-lug front-locking system was
not as smooth as the mechanism on the No.1 Mk III. Together with the
five-round magazine, it gave German infantry a slower rate of fire than
British Tommies. It could still put out as much firepower as most rifles
of the period. Its biggest drawback was its 49.2-inch length.
Critically,
the Gewehr 98 was incredibly sturdy and consistent. Superior
manufacturing meant that, even as Germany struggled for resources later
in the war, the rifle was always reliable and could take a battering in
the trenches. The Basic Gewehr 98 design also served Germany in WWII, although it was the Gewehr "K" variant, not as long as the original, still was the basic rifle of the German Military.
Mannlicher Model 1895
Austro-Hungarian
troops carried a very similar weapon to their German allies. The
Mannlicher Model 1895 was another long bolt-action rifle with a straight
pull mechanism. The integral five-round magazine was filled with 8mm
ammunition. It was an effective, reliable weapon that was widely used in
southern and eastern Europe and was influential on later weapon design.
Source:
*Christopher Chant (1986), The New Encyclopedia of Handguns
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I had to change the comment format on this blog due to spammers, I will open it back up again in a bit.