This was supposed to post Saturday, I got lost in the scheduled post I have in the system because I may be out of battery for a couple of days. Oh Well :)
I shamelessly clipped this article from "GunsDigest", it cropped up in my facebook feed, and I spent time reading it and it was full of information that I didn't know. I knew about the snafu with the ammo and the M16 in Vietnam with the ordinance department fondness for ball powder over the "stick" powder that the AR-15/M16 was designed to run on. I keep wondering how many GI's paid for the hubris of the Ordinance dept and their attempts to shaft the M16 and the troops because they didn't like the idea that some "outsider" could do it better than they could. This article added a lot of stuff that I didn't know, from the all the attempts to sabotage the rifle during trials because they didn't like it. All I can speak for is my experience with the M16A1 and the M16A2 that I was issued while I was in the service. I never had a problem with the rifle, even though we were taught "SPORTS" for a stoppage or a misfeed. If I recall it was:
"Smack the magazine
Pull the charging handle back
Observe the chamber
Release the charging handle
Tap the Forward assist
Squeeze the trigger
My older AR is the original AR pattern down to the 3 prong flash suppressor and no forward assist and I never had a problem with the rifle functioning except with "Tula" ammo, I blogged about that extensively
I was very comfortable shooting the AR/M16 pattern rifle and I did take it to war and it served me well, And it didn't lay down on me. I knew people in the service in my unit that complained about the rifle during the range blaming it for their inability to shoot. I would nod in the affirm, ask for their rifle, and shoot a 3 round group at 25 meters that you could put a dime on and hand the rifle back to them and smile. I was called "Davy Crockett" by one of my Drill sergeants during basic because of my groupings. It helped knowing how to shoot before going in the service. I owned 2 3AR pattern rifles,(Until that dastardly kayak accident *sniff*Sniff*) one I have had since 1991 and the other one I built last year(2017 and in 2020). I always liked the modular design of the rifle, you can customize it for whatever you want to do. I have nothing against the AK pattern rifle and know how to use it, but I prefer the AR series.
As a result, many M14 rifles were issued with the selector levers removed, making the rifle effectively, an M1 Garand with a 20-round magazine. The M14 was accurate but heavy, weighing nearly nine pounds, empty. As U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War escalated, our troops encountered North Vietnamese as well as the Vietcong carrying the Soviet-designed AK47 (Avtomat Kalashnikova model 47), chambered for the 7.62×39mm Soviet cartridge, and had a 30-round magazine. The AK’s light recoil permitted controllable, accurate full-auto bursts and American troops began to feel outgunned. The United States needed it’s own assault rifle — and needed it fast.
During the early 1950s, ArmaLite, a division of Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation of Hollywood, California, was working on a new assault rifle. The chief engineer was Eugene M. Stoner (1922–1997), described by many as the most gifted firearms designer since John Browning. His first attempt to create a new assault rifle was designated the AR10 (ArmaLite Rifle model 10).
The
AR-10 was the first weapon to incorporate Gene Stoner’s patented (U.S.
Patent No. 2,951,424) gas system. This system uses a port in the barrel
to bleed gas from the fired cartridge into a tube that runs under the
hand-guard, from the front sight assembly to the upper receiver and into
the carrier key on the bolt carrier.
The pressure gives a
hammer-like blow to the bolt carrier, pushing it rearward while
simultaneously unlocking the eight-lug bolt from the barrel extension.
The bolt and bolt carrier, continuing to move rearward, extract and
eject the spent cartridge case and the buffer and recoil/buffer spring
return the bolt assembly forward, stripping a cartridge off the
magazine, chambering it and locking the bolt into the barrel extension.
Using expertise gained in the aircraft industry, Stoner designed the
upper and lower receivers of the AR-10 to be made of lightweight
aircraft aluminum.
The first AR-10 prototype, chambered for the 7.62×5 1mm NATO
cartridge carried in a 20-round magazine, was completed in 1955. The
rifle proved extremely accurate for a gas-operated weapon. In December
1955, the first AR10 was presented to the Infantry Board and School at
Fort Benning, Georgia, by Gene Stoner and George Sullivan, an ArmaLite
executive. Stoner demonstrated his new weapon concept to General William
Wyman at Fort Benning on May 6th, just five days after the announcement
of the adoption of the M14.
Subsequently, the Board recommended
further investigation into the AR-10. In 1957 General Wyman, impressed
by the merits and performance of the AR-10, went to the ArmaLite Company
and asked Gene Stoner to join a weapons program, offering ArmaLite
financial support for future development of ArmaLite rifles in exchange
for proprietary rights to the final product. Subsequently, ArmaLite
introduced a totally new concept for the modern battlefield, a
22-caliber battle rifle. As a result, the 30-caliber AR-10 was to have a
short history with the U.S. military.
The AR-10, scaled down to
fire the popular 222 Remington cartridge, had little recoil in semi-auto
mode and was amazingly controllable on full-auto. There was heavy
resistance to the radical new design from the Ordnance Corps, especially
from Dr. Frederick Carten. Doctor Carten was adamantly opposed to
weapons developed by commercial companies outside the Ordnance Corps and
Springfield Armory, as well as guns made of aluminum and plastic.
General
Wyman ordered 10 of these new rifles, along m with 100,000 rounds of
ammunition, for Infantry M Board trials. ArmaLite’s W focus was thus
changed to the 22-caliber rifle and the AR-15 M (ArmaLite Rifle model
15) was born. In 1958, General Wyman ordered the Army to conduct the
first tests on the new AR-15.
Among the
changes from the AR-10 to the AR-15 were revised sights to accommodate
the flatter-shooting 22-caliber cartridge; elevation to be adjusted via a
threaded front post sight rather than within the rear sight, where a
less expensive L-shaped peep sight was substituted. The resulting rifle
was 37½ inches long and weighed an incredible 6 pounds empty; 6.12
pounds with a loaded 25-round magazine.
The AR-15 made use of
high-impact fibrite stocks, pistol grips and handguards. A selector
lever on the left side of the rifle could be manipulated with the
shooter’s right thumb without removing the hand from the pistol grip.
The magazine release, on the right side of the receiver, could be
operated with the trigger finger; when pressed, the magazine would drop
free.
A fresh magazine, requiring no camming — or ‘rocking’ —
could be inserted straight into the magazine well. This attribute
contributed significantly to speedy reloading in combat situations
compared to its closest rival, the AK47/AKM. These are two of the main
reasons why the AR-15/M16-series rifles are considered the finest
human-engineered assault rifles in the world.
A bolt catch
mechanism is located on the left side of the rifle. When the last round
was fired, the magazine follower would elevate the bolt catch and lock
the bolt to the rear. After inserting a full magazine, the rifleman
would push in on the upper portion of the bolt catch to release the bolt
and load the rifle. The receivers, produced from 7075 T6 aircraft
aluminum, which helps keep the rifle lightweight and dissipates heat
better than conventional metals, are hard-anodized with a non-reflective
matte gray weather-resistant finish.
Stoner went to Aberdeen
Proving Ground for ammunition assistance. He enlisted the expertise of
Robert Hutton, known as the father of the 5.56×45mm round. The pressures
involved were more than the 222 Remington case could handle, so the 222
Special was developed.
Sierra Bullet Co. made the 55-grain full
metal jacket boat-tail bullet and the first “222 Special” ammunition was
loaded by Remington Arms. This cartridge, with a muzzle velocity of
3250 fps and a maximum effective range of 460 meters, became the
5.56×45mm Ball M193/223 Remington.
Tests by the Infantry Board and
School at Fort Benning went very well for the AR-15. Stoner personally
delivered the weapons and conducted training and familiarization classes
for all involved in the testing. In March of 1958, the Board found some
“bugs” in the AR-15 system. Some of the resultant changes incorporated
in the first rifles were reduction of the trigger pull to seven pounds;
replacement of the one-piece handguard with a two-piece triangular
handguard; magazine capacity reduced from 25 to 20 rounds and the
switching of the selector lever settings.
The Board found the
AR-15 to be nearly three times more reliable than the M14 in the
development stages. Despite the positive conclusion of the test, Dr.
Carten’s report stated the AR-15 had not demonstrated sufficient
technical merit and should not be developed by the Army. Accordingly,
the Ordnance Corps lost interest in the AR-15.
When Bill Davis, at
the time Chief of the Small Arms Branch at Aberdeen Proving Ground,
first encountered the AR-15, he was quite impressed and found it had no
shortcomings that would not be worked out in the normal course of
development. Davis thought Carten’s decision to drop the AR-15 rifle was
a bad one and that the weapon held great promise.
On
February 19, 1959, Colt’s Patent Firearms Manufacturing Company of
Hartford, Connecticut purchased the rights to the AR-15 and AR-10 from
Fairchild Stratos (ArmaLite) for a lump sum of $75,000 plus a royalty of
four and a half percent on all further production of the AR-15 and
AR-10. Colt also paid Cooper & Macdonald (a sales group who did a
lot of work in Southeast Asia) $250,000 and a one percent royalty on all
production of AR-15 and AR-10 rifles.
In July of 1960, Air Force
General Curtis LeMay attended a Fourth of July celebration where a Colt
salesman placed three watermelons on a firing range at distances of 50,
100 and 150 yards — then gave General LeMay an AR-15 and loaded
magazines. Following this hands-on range evaluation, General LeMay
ordered 80,000 rifles on the spot. However, Congress put the General’s
order on hold.
Concurrently, Colt had requested a re-trial from
the Ordnance Corps to demonstrate improvements to the rifle. Initially
the request was denied, the Ordnance Corps saying the military had no
use for such a weapon. However, a request arrived at the Pentagon from
Lackland Air Force Base requesting the AR-15 be qualified as a candidate
to replace M2 carbines. This turn of events caused Congress to
investigate why the Ordnance Corps had boycotted the AR-15.
Subsequently, the Ordnance Corps set up the test without delay.
The
test was concluded in November 1960. Three rifles were subjected to a
light machine-gun test and two to accuracy tests. There were a total of
24,443 rounds fired. One rifle in the accuracy test delivered an amazing
10-round group at 100 yards that measured only 1.5 inches; any group
under six inches at 100 yards being acceptable for an assault rifle. The
rifle also performed admirably in the unlubricated, dust, extreme cold
and rain tests. The final results indicated the AR-15 was superior to
all competitors, including the M14. The rifle was then approved for Air
Force trial.
It took General LeMay three tries before his request was approved. In
the summer of 1961, the Deputy Defense Secretary approved 8,500 AR-15
rifles for the Air Force, pending congressional approval … which
Congress withheld. General LeMay then brought the issue to President
Kennedy, without success. Finally, in May of 1962, the purchase was
approved. With things warming up in Southeast Asia, the AR-15 was about
to meet the Army.
Many of the U.S. advisors in Vietnam were
equipped with the new AR-15 rifle. Rifles began to surface throughout
Vietnam, totally outside the normal small arms procurement process. The
first troops using the AR-15 under combat conditions were very
enthusiastic, preferring it to all other weapons. The South Vietnamese
were impressed with the rifle, as well. In December 1961, Secretary of
Defense Robert McNamara authorized a purchase of 1,000 AR-15s.
There
was further testing (Project AGILE) to explore the compatibility of the
AR-15 rifle to the smaller Vietnamese. The results indicated the AR-15
was more suitable for the South Vietnamese military than the M2 carbine.
In actual combat, the new 5.56×45mm cartridge was found to be more
lethal than its 30-caliber counterparts. while Project AGILE testing was
being conducted, the Army completed the Hitch Report, which was a
comparison of the AR-15, AK47, M14 and Ml Garand. The report concluded
that the AR-15 was superior to the weapons to which it was compared.
Testing
of the AR-15 weapon system had met with contempt from the Ordnance
Corps. In one test in the Arctic, weapons were malfunctioning at
alarming rates. As soon as Gene Stoner heard, he was on the next plane
to Fort Greeley, Alaska. He found parts misaligned, front sights removed
(front sights held in with taper pins have no reason to ever be
removed) and replaced with pieces of welding rod.
With missing and
damaged parts, there was no way the weapons would function properly
and, with welding rod replacing the front sight, accuracy suffered. The
arctic test was, in fact, rigged to make the AR-15 look inadequate. Gene
Stoner repaired all the weapons; the test resumed and the weapons
performed admirably.
Fortunately, Defense Secretary McNamara was
fond of the AR-15, knew the Ordnance Corps was dragging its feet on the
weapon and on January 23, 1963, halted all procurements of the M14.
Finally, in 1964, Defense Secretary McNamara ordered the Ordnance Corps
to work with all branches of the armed forces to get the AR-15 ready for
issue to all military personnel…one rifle for all branches. The Army
purchased 100,000 rifles for issue to the Air Assault, Airborne, Ranger
and Special Forces units.
After the AR15 —
now, the M16 rifle — went into circulation, more was learned about how
to improve the rifle. The rifling twist was changed from 1:14 inches to
1:12 inches. The Army wanted a manual bolt closure device added so, if
the bolt failed to lock, it could be manually closed — and the forward
assist assembly was born. The firing pin was lightened to prevent
slam-fires (caused by the inertia of the firing pin when the bolt closed
on a round). The buffer was changed from the original hollow version to
one with weights in it to prevent the bolt from bouncing back when it
slammed into the barrel extension.
On November 4, 1963, Colt was
awarded a contract worth $13.5 million dollars for the procurement of
104,000 rifles … the legendary “One Time Buy.” Of those rifles, 19,000
were M16s for the Air Force and 85,000 were the XM16E1 (with the bolt
closure device/forward assist assembly) for the Army and Marines. The
XM16E1 was adopted as the M16A1 rifle. Steps were taken to procure
ammunition.
Procurement of the ammunition is one of the main
factors in the rifle’s performance early in the Vietnam War. The initial
ammunition used by DOD was made to Armalite/Colt specifications that
called for IMR 4475 propellant.
The weapon’s reputation for
durability and reliability was based on this ammo/extruded propellant
combination. However, the military wanted to standardize propellants and
the propellant used in the established 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge was
Ball powder manufactured by Olin Corporation. So, when ammunition was
ordered, Olin’s Ball powder was used for the new 5.56×45mm M193 Ball
cartridge. Both powders created the desired 50,750 psi.
Ball
(spherical) powder reaches its peak pressure significantly faster than
extruded IMR powder. Ball powder generates larger amounts of carbon
residue that clogs the gas tube and barrel port, causing the firearm to
malfunction. The most serious malfunctions, during the early use of Ball
powder, involved extraction problems and a significant increase in the
cyclic rate of fire. Despite having this information, the Department Of
Defense still approved use of Ball powder.
Gene Stoner was
approached by Frank Vee of the OSD Comptrollers office after the package
was approved and asked what he (Gene Stoner) thought of the use of Ball
powder. Stoner asked, “Why are you asking me now?” Vee said, “I would
have felt better if you would have approved the package.” Stoner
replied, “Well, now we both don’t feel so good.”
The “one-time
buy” was now a thing of the past. The original $13.5 million contract
turned into a $17,994,694.23 contract. There were an additional 33,500
rifles that went to the Air Force, 240 to the Navy and 82 to the Coast
Guard. Over $517,000 worth of spare parts was ordered.
The first
field performance reports, from the 5th Special Forces in Vietnam, were
excellent. The rifle had been well received and was very popular,
although instruction manuals were in “short supply.” During the
investigation by the Ichord Subcommittee of the M16 Rifle Program,
Honorable Richard Ichord said — regarding the rifle’s reputation with
the North Vietnamese Army and Vietcong — “I understand that they refer
to this rifle as ‘black rifle,’…I have heard their motto is ‘Beware of
the units with the black rifles’… they have been possessed with deadly
fear.”
Letters from the field began
reporting the rifles were malfunctioning at an alarming rate, with U.S.
troops found dead next to jammed M16 rifles. Spent cartridge cases were
becoming lodged in the chamber and the only way to remove them was to
knock them out with a cleaning rod. Requests were made for Colt to send a
representative to the field to solve this problem. This turn of events
was highly publicized by the media.
A representative from Colt, Mr. Kanemitsu Ito, went to Vietnam and
claimed to be shocked, having never seen equipment in such poor shape.
He claimed to have looked down the barrel of one rifle and not seen
‘daylight’ due to severe rusting and pitting. Many of the troops he
spoke to said they were never trained to maintain their rifle, that the
rifle was “self-cleaning” and that they had not handled an M16/M16A1
rifle until they arrived “in-country.” Subsequently, Mr. Ito gave
classes on maintenance all over South Vietnam.
Seeking an
independent, unbiased report of the true field performance situation,
the Ichord Congressional Subcommittee selected a retired officer,
Colonel Crossman, as their representative and sent him to Vietnam. In
the course of his investigation, he interviewed 250 soldiers and Marines
throughout South Vietnam, fully 50 percent of whom reported
malfunctions with their M16/M16A1 rifles.
Of these malfunctions,
90 percent were failures to extract. Colonel Crossman found 22-caliber
cleaning kits in short supply and concluded many of the problems were
due to lack of maintenance and cleaning. He also felt there was room for
improvement in the rifle. He concluded, “It was not possible to
correlate ammunition make or type with malfunctions.” His findings
report, dated June 16, 1967, included the statement that the rifle
needed a complete overhaul in design and manufacture.
According to
Gene Stoner, there were hardly any 22-caliber cleaning kits in Vietnam —
and no instruction manuals. The “cleanup” began: The military developed
bore and chamber cleaning brushes and began to distribute 22-caliber
cleaning kits, firearm maintenance cards and instruction manuals, for
the M16/M16A1 rifles.
From May 15th through August 22nd, 1967, the
much-publicized Ichord Congressional Subcommittee (Honorable Richard
Ichord, Chairman) investigated the history, development, testing,
procurement and foreign sales of the M16 rifle. During the
investigation, the subcommittee visited U.S. military training
installations of all branches where the committee members interviewed
hundreds of Vietnam returnees on their experiences with the M16/ M16A1
rifle.
They also visited South Vietnam to interview troops in
combat zones. Several people were called to testify before the
subcommittee. Two topics, not identified until after the subcommittee
returned from Vietnam, were the propellant and high cyclic rate issues.
The subcommittee would focus most of their attention on these two
aspects.
Reports from Vietnam of failures to
extract in the field caused the subcommittee great concern. They
investigated, finding the major contributor to malfunctions was
ammunition assembled using Ball powder. The change from IMR extruded
powder to Ball powder in 1964 for the 5.56mm ammunition was neither
justified nor supported by test data, they found. The subcommittee also
found the Ball propellant sole-source position enjoyed by Olin Mathieson
for many years — and their close relationship with the Army — may have
influenced Army Materiel Command.
They felt the AR-15/M16 rifle,
as initially developed, was an excellent and reliable weapon. Further,
certain modifications made to the rifle at the insistence of the Army —
also unsupported by test data — were unnecessary. For example, both the
Air Force and the Marine Corps found no evidence to support the expense
and possible problems of the manual bolt closure (forward assist)
device.
Gene Stoner was called to testify at the congressional
hearings to explain the extraction problem; he explained the failure to
extract was due to the use of Ball powder.
Gene Stoner [To Mr.
Bray]: “Well, the cartridge tends to stick under high residual pressure
in the barrel, and of course with this too-soon action you also have a
higher bolt velocity. In other words, your bolt is trying to open at
higher speeds, so you have an aggravated condition where the cartridge
is tending to stick in there a little longer or a little harder, and you
are also giving it a harder jerk by driving the bolt faster.”
Gene Stoner [To Mr. Bray]: “This is probably one of the worst conditions you can get, by increasing the cyclic rate.”
Basically, Ball propellant causes the bolt to open prematurely, before the spent cartridge case has had sufficient time to contract. The result is the extractor shears off the rim of the spent cartridge case — which sticks in the chamber. Ball and IMR powders create the same peak pressure but the Ball powder reaches its peak much faster than IMR powder, causing a significant increase in the cyclic rate of fire.
Ball powder leaves significantly more fouling in the chamber and bolt assembly. Gene Stoner also pointed out the rifle had gone through more than 22 changes from his original design and neither Colt nor the Department of Defense consulted him on how some changes would impact his design.
The forward assist was one of the changes on which he was not consulted and Mr. Ichord asked Gene Stoner his opinion of the device.
Gene Stoner [To Mr. Ichord]: “I wasn’t in on that, except I was told the Army insisted on it. There were reasons for it.
One
reason was that they felt that due to the fact that the M1, and the M14
rifle, and the carbine had always had something for a soldier to push
on; that maybe this would be a comforting feeling to him, or something. I
could never quite get it through my mind that it was necessary. I did
not really advise it. I thought it was a mistake, myself. But I made my
thought known to the people.”
He
explained the last thing you want to do is force a round into a dirty
chamber, which quickly leads to function failures. The chamber fouling
tends to embed in the soft brass cartridge case and lock it in, causing a
fired cartridge case to be — literally — locked into the chamber at the
moment of extraction.
Gene Stoner was able to prove the rifle and
ammunition combination he furnished to Armalite/Colt was a totally
reliable weapon system and the change the military made, without his
consent, caused the malfunctions. He told the committee he expressed
these concerns to the OSD Comptrollers office and was ignored. The
subcommittee accepted this as the reason for the condition.
M16
rifle project manager, Col. Yout, was of particular interest to the
subcommittee. Throughout the hearing he was accused of making
irresponsible decisions as to the direction of the program.
Mr.
Ichord [to Col. Yout]: “We have evidence and are advised by our experts …
that Ball propellant, which you apparently speak so highly of, does
have an adverse affect upon the operation of the M16 rifle. It speeded
up the cyclic rate. It is dirtier burning … . When we are also advised
that the Army was cautioned against making this change from IMR to Ball
propellant … Naturally, we would be quite concerned. Apparently you
aren’t so concerned. I don’t understand your explanation. I just haven’t
been able to understand you — but perhaps you haven’t offered the
information in words I can understand. Would you care to say something?”
He never replied to the question.
The Army made a statement on
July 27, 1967: “From the vantage point of retrospect, it has sometimes
been suggested that the particular behavior of Ball propellant should
have been predicted … Had the Army anticipated these developments, it is
most unlikely that the course chosen in January, 1964, would have been
the same. A decision to reduce the velocity requirement, and continue
loading IMR4475 propellant would probably have been made instead, and
development of alternate propellants could have been pursued more
deliberately.”
This is the closest to an admission of negligence
by the Army for the decision to use Ball powder. Gene Stoner warned them
long before it got to this point; who would know more about the rifle’s
performance and design intent than the man who designed it? In the end,
the rifle was not the problem; instead, this was an ammunition-driven
problem that altered the design intent of the rifle.
In August
1967, the hearings ended, and in October 1967, the subcommittee
concluded, “Grave mismanagement, errors of judgment and lack of
responsibility had characterized the Army’s handling of the entire M16
program.” They stated the officials in the Department of the Army were
aware of the adverse affect of Ball propellant on the cyclic rate of the
M16 rifle as early as March 1964, yet continued to accept delivery of
additional thousands of rifles that were not subjected to acceptance or
endurance tests using Ball propellant.
All Colt endurance testing
was done using IMR 4475. The subcommittee also concluded, “The failure
on the part of officials with authority in the Army to cause action to
be taken to correct the deficiencies of the 5.56mm ammunition borders on
criminal negligence.”
The cyclic rate of the rifle was increased
10 to 15 percent (approximately 200 rounds per minute), resulting in
higher stress on certain components caused by the higher velocity of the
bolt carrier assembly. As a result, there were parts driven beyond
their working parameters – as well as the bolt opening prematurely.
Many
parts were changed to more stringent specifications to help deal with
the higher pressure curve and harder impact. To solve the chamber
corrosion and failure-to-extract issues, all future production rifle
barrels would be chrome-lined. Even though chrome-lining barrels is a
military specification, Ordinance failed to require this basic
requirement on the AR-15/M16 rifle system.
The new, improved M16/M16A1 barrel assemblies would have stamped on the barrel, in front of the front sight assembly: “C” (Chrome Chamber Only), “C MP B” (Chrome Chamber, Barrel & Magnetic Resonance Tested) or “C MP Chrome Bore”(Chrome Chamber, Barrel & Magnetic Resonance Tested). Many experts, including Bill Davis, felt the failure to chrome the chamber was responsible for many of the early malfunctions in Vietnam.
The flash hider was changed from the early three-prong to the new “bird cage” style. The three-prong suppressor was superior to the new design, but was snagprone in the field. With these modifications in place, the M16/M16A1 rifle was “perfected” and performing to the Department of Defense acceptance standards.
The AR15/M16 Carbines
Soon there was a demand
for a smaller, more compact, version of the rifle. Early in 1966, the
Army expressed interest for a carbine for its special operation units,
placing an order totaling some 2,050 carbines. Lieutenant Col. Yout
later ordered an additional 765 Colt “Commandos” — and a new name was
coined for the carbine project. The first carbines were known as CAR15
(Colt Automatic Rifle). These first designs incorporated a 10-inch
barrel and a sliding butt stock. Later the barrel was changed to 11.4
inches to permit the weapon to launch grenades. The Army signed a
contract for 2,815 “Commando model” submachine guns on June 28, 1966.
As
expected, the CAR15 — now the XM177E2 — successfully passed all testing
phases at Aberdeen Proving Ground. However, a new problem appeared: the
deafening noise and large fireball from the muzzle, thanks to the
CAR15’s higher cyclic rate of 700 to 1,000 rounds per minute. As a
remedy, many of these rifles were equipped with 14.5-inch barrels, a
practice that carried over to the M4 project of the early 1980s.
Product Improvement (PIP)
On
October 28, 1980, there was a new 5.56×45mm cartridge on the block.
NATO (Northern Atlantic Treaty Organization) had adopted the
Belgian-made SS109. This new bullet had two major differences from the
GI 5.56×45mm M193 Ball cartridge. First, the bullet weighed 62 grains
instead of 55 grains. Second, this new bullet had a hardened steel
penetrator core, giving this new 5.56×45mm round better penetration at
all distances than the 7.62×51mm NATO (M80 Ball) round.This new SS109
round penetrated three 3.5mm mild steel plates at 640 meters and a U.S.
issue helmet at 1,300 meters.
The new 5.56×45mmNATO round
revolutionized military small arms ammunition all over the world. In
1974, the Soviet Union switched from the 7.62×39mm (AK47/AKM) to the
5.45×39mm Soviet round of the new AK74 rifle. This new round was a
.221-inch diameter 52-grain full metal jacket boat-tail armor-piercing
bullet with a velocity of 3000fps.
The new SS109 round was more
lethal than the original M193 Ball round due to the faster “spin” and
fragmentation upon impact with soft tissue.
Switzerland re-designed the M855/SS109 round with a thicker jacket to stop fragmentation upon impact.
This new cartridge, however, was significantly more accurate at longer ranges than the M193 Ball cartridge, boosting the maximum effective range to 800 meters. To accommodate this new cartridge, a new barrel twist — from 1:12 inches to 1:7 inches — was required to stabilize the heavier 62-grain bullet.
There was a catch: the SS109 ammunition could not be fired accurately in an M16/M16A1 rifle due to its slower rifling twist. The bullet would not stabilize and would “keyhole” in flight. This new cartridge was about to be adopted as the M855 Ball cartridge of the U.S. military and the new PIP project would redesign the M16A1 rifle around this cartridge.
The United States Marine Corps began negotiations with Colt in January of 1980, asking for three modified rifles that would make use of the new FN SS109/XM855 cartridge and would incorporate four Marine-designated changes:
1. The sights must be adjustable to 800 meters.
2. The bullet must be accurate to 800 meters and possess the capability to penetrate all known steel helmets and body armor at 800 meters.
3. The strength of the plastic stock, pistol grip and handguards — as well as the strength of the exposed portion of the barrel — must be improved.
4. The rifle must have the full-auto capability replaced with a 3-shot burst mode.
The Joint Services Small Arms Program (JSSAP) PIP
The
first rifles arrived from Colt in November of 1981. The USMC Firepower
Division at Quantico, Virginia, would lead the PIP project. On November
11th, 20 Marines and 10 soldiers from the 197th Infantry Brigade at Fort
Benning, Georgia, would take 30 M16A1 rifles and 30 M16A1E1 (PIP
rifles) and test them for a month.
The test report was issued on December 11th and the conclusions were as follows:
• The sights were easily adjusted in the field by hand rather than with a bullet tip.
• Increased the effectiveness at long range, more so than the M16A1.
• More durable plastic furniture on the M16A1E1, for hand-to-hand combat.
• Sights were better for low-light conditions thanks to a larger-diameter (5mm) close-range aperture in the rear sight.
• Increased ammunition conservation and more effective fire with the 3-round burst than with full-auto fire.
• Utilized the XM855 NATO (SS109) ammunition, which improves the
accuracy and penetration at all ranges. The product-improvement (PIP)
“M16A1E1” was classified as the M16A2 in September of 1982 and was
adopted by the United States Marine Corps in November of 1983. The
Marines ordered 76,000 M16A2 rifles from Colt. The Army did not adopt
the M16A2 until 1986.
The M16A2 Rifle
There were twelve major changes from the M16A1 to the M16A2 and, although the rifles seem similar at first glance, they are two totally different weapons. Many improvements were necessary to accommodate the new M855 Ball and M856 tracer rounds. The twelve major variances between the Al and A2 are as follows:1. The flash suppresser of the M16A1 is now a muzzle brake/ compensator on the M16A2. Instead of having vents all around the flash suppresser, the bottom has been left solid, which reduces muzzle climb and prevents dust from flying when firing from the prone position.
2. The barrel, from the front sight assembly to the flash suppressor/compensator, is heavier. The M16A1 rifles barrels were known to bend when paratroopers landed and the barrels hit the ground. When the Al barrels would heat up, sling tension could bend them. The new M16A2 barrels had a rifling twist of 1:7 inches to accommodate the SS109/M855 cartridge.
3.The front sight post on the M16A2 is square, contrasted to the round post of the M16A1.
4. The M16A2 handguard was redesigned to have an interchangeable, upper and lower, round ribbed handguard.
5. The slip-ring “delta ring” was redesigned and is now canted for easier removal of the hand-guards.
6. A spent shell deflector was added to the upper receiver behind the ejection port of the M16A2 to accommodate left-hand shooters and, as well, the pivot pin area of the upper receiver has been strengthened. The area around the buffer tube extension (takedown pin area) was strengthened to prevent cracking during hand-to-hand combat or from impact on the butt of the weapon while cushioning one’s fall.
7. The rear sight was redesigned. The 1.75mm and 5mm apertures made adjustable for windage as well as elevation. The maximum elevation setting is 800 meters. There is still an “L-shaped” sight aperture, and there is a 5mm aperture battle sight effective to 200 meters.
8. The forward assist assembly was changed from the “tear drop” style of the M16A1 to the new round “button” style forward assist assembly of the M16A2.
9. The pistol grip is now made of a stronger plastic (™Zytel), and incorporates a “swell” below the middle finger position.
10. The three-shot Burst selector lever setting of the M16A2 replaced the Auto setting of the M16A1.
11. The⅝-inch longer M16A2 stock is made from foam-filled nylon, said to be ten to twelve times stronger than the fibrite stocks of the M16 /M16A1.
12. The buttplate has been made stronger (™Zytel), and the entire buttplate is checkered. The trapdoor can be opened by hand rather requiring the tip of a cartridge.
Critics Attack the M16A2
There
were critics who still found problems with the M16A2. One of the
greatest criticisms was the substitution of the Burst mode for the
Automatic mode selector option. The critics reasoned the M16 rifle was
adopted because U.S. troops felt outgunned by the North Vietnamese
Army/Viet Cong who were equipped with full-auto AK47s.
While,
theoretically, the 3-round burst was more effective than full-auto fire,
there was no substitute for a well-trained automatic rifleman. More
recently, infantry units have noticed it takes more time to clear rooms
and buildings in the MOUT (Military Operations in Urban Terrain)
environment with the 3-round burst versus the full-auto mode and feel
the full-auto option is desirable in those circumstances.
Not only
was the conceptual validity of the three-round Burst under scrutiny,
but the mechanical design as well. The burst mechanism does not recycle.
If only two rounds were fired — because the trigger was not held long
enough or the weapon ran out of ammunition — the next time the trigger
was pulled only one round would fire.
Further, some critics found
the sighting system too complex. The Canadian military addressed many of
the issues brought up by American military critics. When Canada
replaced their aging FN FAL 7.62mmNATO rifles, they modeled the new
rifle after the M16A2. Their Diemaco-manufactured C7 was, virtually, an
M16A2 that retained the rear sight and the full-auto setting of the
M16A1.
Some critics did not like the fact that the new M855
cartridge could not be fired in the current issue M16 /M16A1 rifles
without raising concerns that the fast l:7-inch rifling twist would more
quickly burn out barrels during extended rapid fire.
The “Shorty” Program Revisited: The M4 Carbine.
In 1994, the Army adopted the second carbine of the 20th century and the first general issue carbine since 1941, the M4, perhaps the finest carbine ever developed. They were, at first, to be used by special operation units, but then were selected for use in many other units. Deliveries began in August of 1994, from Colt’s Manufacturing, for 24,000 M4 carbines contracted at $11 million; another contract followed in 1995 for 16,217 M4A1 carbines.The M4 is basically an M16A2 with a telescoping butt stock and a 14.5-inch barrel. The barrel has the heavy profile of the M16A2 barrel with a modified groove to accommodate the M203 grenade launcher. With its 14.5-inch barrel, the M4 fires the M855 Ball round at 2900 fps.
The M4 incorporates the M16A2 fully adjustable rear sight. Colt’s Manufacturing claims there is little, if any, difference in accuracy at ranges up to 500-600 meters. M4 carbines can be found with either full-auto or burst settings. The M4 duplicates the reliability and accuracy of the full-size rifle and weighs only 5.65 pounds.
The M4 has two variants, the standard M4 and the M4A1. The M4A1 is identical to the M4 with the exception of its removable carrying handle, which is attached to a Picatinny Weaver rail system. This arrangement enables easy attachment of optical sighting systems or, by reattaching the carrying handle, use of the iron sights.
Rebirth of the AR-10, Further Developments by Gene Stoner
The legacy of the ArmaLite rifles is far from over. The great weapons designer, Eugene Stoner, never stopped working on his AR-10 design. He, along with C. Reed Knight of Knight’s Manufacturing, perfected the AR-10 and added many design features of the M16A2, to build the SR25 (Stoner Rifle Model 25). The model number comes from adding the 10 from the AR-10 and the 15 from the AR-15.Basically the SR25 looks like an M16 on steroids, beefed up to accommodate the 30-caliber round. The SR25 Match rifle is a 7.62×51mm NATO sniper rifle. Knight’s Manufacturing is one of the only manufacturers that guarantee their rifle will shoot one minute of angle at 100 yards using factory 168-grain Match 7.62×51mm NATO/308 Winchester ammunition. This rifles incorporates the 5R rifling sniper barrel manufactured by Remington Arms for the M24 sniper rifle.
Knight’s Manufacturing is the only company to which Remington has ever sold these precision barrel blanks. The 5R rifling is designed to optimize the use of 168-grain Match 7.62×51mm NATO/308 Winchester ammunition. Many firearms experts claim the SR25 is the most accurate semi-automatic rifle in the world.
In May of 2000, the U.S. Navy SEALS adopted the SR25 — now classified as the Mk 11 Mod 0 — as a full weapons system: rifle, Leupold scope, back-up pop-up iron sights and a sound suppressor. This is a modified SR25 Match rifle, which has a 20-inch barrel instead of 24-inch barrel. Following this sale, the U.S. Army Rangers also purchased SR25 rifles.
Production Sources of Civilian/ Military Versions of the AR-15/M16
The
AR-15 rifle has been copied all over the world, in military and
sporting configurations. The Canadian military adopted the C7 as its
main battle rifle. The C7, literally a modified M16A2 rifle, is
manufactured by Diemaco of Ontario, Canada, an unknown company to most
of the world but a large player in this weapons system.
The semi-automatic Colt AR-15/ Sporter-series rifles have become very popular in the world of competitive shooters. Colt’s Manufacturing Company, Inc., manufactures more civilian versions of the rifle than any other manufacturer, even though there are many other semi-auto clones produced. One of the finest is the XM15E2S, made by Quality Parts-Bushmaster Firearms. Some other manufacturers are Olympic Arms of Olympia, Washington, and ArmaLite, Inc., a division of Eagle Arms of Coal Valley, Illinois.
The AR-15/M16 rifle has come a long way, surviving political opposition and its troubles in Vietnam to become one of the finest military rifles ever produced, with more than 9 million M16-series rifles in service throughout the world, equipping the troops of more than 20 nations. The U.S. military has always been a military of marksmen, and the M16A2 complements this philosophy, setting a standard of accuracy very few assault rifles can match while enjoying the reputation of being the finest human-engineered assault rifle in the world.
The M16-series rifle continues to be the rifle of choice of SWAT teams and police departments all over the country, and it will be the main battle rifle of the United States well into the new millennium.
