The musings of a politically incorrect dinosaur from a forgotten age where civility was the rule rather than the exception.
Webster
The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." --American Statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852)
Thursday, December 26, 2019
Postwar Aircraft Carrier Fires
Still recovering from Christmas. My son got some parts to mod his truck and I will post those in a day or 2 also. I have every intent of avoiding any retail establishment on this day.
I have heard of the Oriskany and of course of the Forrestal Fire. I have a book in my library that talked about the Forrestal fire and it is a very good book. It did explain a few things I didn't know.
I had picked up in some bargain bin a long time ago and it was very well done and researched. I had learned a lot about it. I heard something about a fire on the U.S.S Enterprise(CVN-65) Fires on a ship is a very big deal, that is usually what sinks them. The Lessons of the Forrestal are still taught at Naval shipboard schools.
Aircraft carriers may “rule the seas,” but even they do not have
immunity from disasters at sea. To quote the 1973 U.S. Navy training
film Trial By Fire: A Carrier Fights for Life, “Yet for all
this vast strength, as real as it is apparent, a carrier at sea is extremely vulnerable since her striking arm requires the use of exotic
fuels and powerful weapons. She is forced to carry with her the
potential for her own destruction. It’s all around her, on and below
decks, waiting—waiting for a miscue, a careless error, or a tragic
accident.”
Since the members of a ship’s crew are human like anyone else, when
thousands of souls embark on a carrier they have no choice but to put
their lives in their shipmates’ hands. They have to trust the rules and
procedures designed to best mitigate the hazards of such a dangerous
environment.
There is no telling how many times sailors on board an aircraft
carrier have flirted with disaster, and simply been lucky. During the
1960’s, as the Vietnam War brought American sailors into major combat
conditions for the first time since the Korean War, three aircraft
carriers were not so lucky.
Oriskany (foreground) and her sister Bonhomme Richard conducting operations in the Gulf of Tonkin in 1970 Oriskany was no stranger to fire during combat operations.
During the Korean War, a “hung” bomb on a F4U Corsair fighter broke
loose and exploded as the aircraft landed, killing 2 and injuring 14
sailors. But that paled in comparison to the conflagration that struck
the ship 13 years later. Oriskany had been at Yankee Station in the Gulf of Tonkin
since early July 1966, conducting airstrikes against North Vietnam. On
October 27, a three-foot-long magnesium parachute flare somehow ignited
while a sailor was handling it in the ship’s hangar bay. The sailor
reportedly panicked and threw the flare, burning at 5,400º F, back into
the “flare locker,” a space which held at least 700 more flares. Those
also ignited, resulting in an explosion that blasted open the locker’s
steel bulkheads.
Oriskany on fire
The explosion itself, the chemical fire, and the suffocating smoke
from the burning magnesium—which cannot be put out with water, rendering
the hangar bay sprinkler system useless—caused 38 sailors to be
injured, 3 aircraft destroyed, and 3 aircraft damaged.
Trial by Fire "A carrier fights for survival.
Worse, 43 sailors died, mostly pilots who had been sleeping in nearby
staterooms when the explosion occurred, and succumbed while trapped by
the intense heat and smoke. Oriskany was forced to depart to San Francisco Bay Naval
Shipyard to repair the extensive damage. She would return to the combat
zone in July 1967.
An F-8 Crusader intercepts a Tu-95 “Bear-D”. Oriskany, from which the F-8 launched, can be seen in the background. Oriskany arrived back at Yankee Station in time to be witness to, and aid in, a shipboard disaster that far eclipsed her own. The Forrestal fire marks the second worst loss of life on a Navy ship after World War II. Forrestal had arrived in theater just six days previously
and was beginning her fifth day of airstrikes against North Vietnam.
Many factors united to create the deadly conditions that led to tragedy.
For instance, some ordnance handlers followed loose procedures that
violated Navy safety regulations. Some equipment had material
deficiencies. Also, due to a shortage of Mk-83 bombs, the Navy supplied Forrestal with badly deteriorated AN-M65 1,000-lb bombs left over from the Korean War.
The
U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Forrestal (CV-59) underway at sea in
1987. Various aircraft of Carrier Air Wing 6 (CVW-6) are visible on deckA major factor was that, aside from the sailors who had been
specially trained as firefighters, most of the crew and especially the
air wing were generally ignorant of proper shipboard firefighting and
damage control procedures.
World War II had proven the value of training all sailors to fight
fires, but the practice had lapsed over the years. On top of that,
damage control equipment had not been sufficiently updated over time to
keep pace with changing combat conditions.
A
port bow view of the aircraft carrier USS FORRESTAL (CV 59) passing
through a rainbow while underway in the North Atlantic Ocean during
Exercise TEAM WORK’88.That fateful day, 27 aircraft were staged on Forrestal‘s
flight deck, fully fueled and bristling with various bombs, missiles,
rockets, and 20 mm ammunition. Everyone was busily preparing for an
11:00 AM launch. But at 10:51, a power surge in an F-4 Phantom triggered
the inadvertent firing of one of the Phantom’s Zuni rockets.
The flash from the rocket was recorded by the ship’s Pilot Landing
Aid Television (PLAT) camera. The Zuni crossed the flight deck and
struck an A-4 Skyhawk 100 feet away, rupturing its 400-gallon fuel tank
and igniting the spilling fuel.
An A-4 Skyhawk burns shortly after its fuel tank was struck by a Zuni missile.
In the blink of an eye, flames engulfed several aircraft. Future
Senator John McCain, back then a Naval aviator, managed to escape from
his own A-4 as Chief Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Gerald Farrier began
fighting the fire with a Purple-K canister, trying to help other pilots
who were trapped in the flames. McCain got away in the nick of time, as
the AN-M65 bombs too quickly yielded their devastating payload.
Words fail to succinctly describe the horror of the catastrophic
chain reaction of explosions. The first bomb “cooked off” a mere 90
seconds after the fire began. At least 8 explosions wiped out two
firefighting teams and tore gaping holes in the flight deck, and the
fire raged out of control. Burning jet fuel poured into the holes and
down the sides of the ship, expanding the fire to multiple decks below.
The
U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Forrestal (CVA-59) underway off the
Philippines on 12 August 1967. This photo was taken approximately three
weeks after fires and explosions damaged the ship off Vietnam on 29 July
1967.
When the explosions subsided, Forrestal‘s sailors heroically
set out to save their ship, and finally extinguished the last of the
flames at 4 AM the next day. Unfortunately, their lack of training in
some cases caused more trouble. Foam hose teams spread protective foam
only to see water hose teams wash it away. Water hose teams also caused
additional damage by unnecessarily flooding spaces untouched by the
fire.
In the end, the casualties were 134 killed, 161 injured, 20 aircraft destroyed, and $72 million in damage to the ship. Forrestal was effectively knocked out of the Vietnam War, and would take 2 years to repair. USS Forrestal (CV-59) underway on trials, 29 September 1955, just prior to commissioning The video recording of the inferno from Forrestal‘s PLAT camera was incorporated into the previously mentioned Trial By Fire
film. For years afterward, countless sailors watched it as part of
training classes. The Navy named its new firefighting school in Norfolk
in honor of Chief Farrier, immortalized as “the Chief with the Purple-K”
in the film.
The Navy made many changes to its policies and damage control
equipment as a direct result of the fire. Most notably, firefighting and
damage control training became mandatory for crew-members on every Navy
ship.
An aerial starboard beam view of the aircraft carrier USS FORRESTAL (CV-59) underway.
A Zuni rocket was once again the catalyst the third time disaster struck
an aircraft carrier during the Vietnam War. This time, it was Enterprise that relived an experience similar to Forrestal‘s: 8 major explosions and a raging fire. Enterprise, however, saw some significant differences.
Unlike Oriskany or Forrestal, Enterprise
was not in a combat situation. She was near Hawaii, in the middle of
what probably many sailors would agree was the second worst time to have
a disastrous fire onboard—an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI).
The
U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) underway returning
to the United States from Western Pacific cruise that included the
evacuation of Saigon16 armed aircraft were scheduled to launch at 8:30 AM. Around 8:15,
according to the Navy JAG investigation afterward, “an MD-3A jet
aircraft starter unit was positioned on the starboard side of an
F-4J…such that its exhaust outlet was in line with and within
twenty-four inches of a loaded LAU-10 ZUNI rocket launcher mounted on
the starboard wing of the aircraft.”
Although several people, including one of the ORI inspectors,
observed the exhaust from the improperly parked “huffer” heating the
rockets, no one took definite action. An overheated rocket exploded,
beginning the exact same chain reaction that had occurred on Forrestal: punctured fuel tanks spilled fuel that ignited, which in turn detonated ordnance.
Sailors aboard Enterprise battle a huge ordnance fire triggered by a Zuni rocket. 14 January 1969As with Forrestal, holes blown in the flight deck allowed burning fuel to enter the interior of the ship. But thanks to Forrestal, nearly all of Enterprise‘s ship’s company and the majority of its embarked air wing had been trained in firefighting, which proved invaluable.
Another major difference in Enterprise‘s case is that the
modern bombs involved did not detonate immediately, buying time for
sailors to jettison other ordnance near the fire. The Captain turned the
ship so that the wind blew the flames clear of undamaged aircraft,
which also helped prevent the fire from spreading across the flight
deck. By 11:38, all fires were extinguished. Sailors from the destroyer Rogers use their on board hoses to assist with the firefighting efforts aboard Enterprise Enterprise‘s casualties were 27 dead and 371 injured. Damage
to the ship was estimated to be over $10 million. In addition, 15
aircraft were destroyed and 17 damaged, costing another estimated $44
million.
The investigative report concluded that “sound damage control
organization, training and execution minimized casualties and prevented
the initial fire from spreading beyond the Fly Three area of the flight
deck to any significant degree.” The report also indicated, however,
that flight deck personnel were still largely deficient in knowledge of
weapons specifics, such as their cook-off times.
View of Enterprise’s stern during the fire, January 1969Mishaps, some fatal, inevitably still occur on carriers. USS Nimitz
(CVN 68) in 1981 experienced a similar fuel and ordnance fire as the
carriers of the 60’s, although on a smaller scale. But overall, the
“lessons learned” in the 60’s resulted in improved policies, procedures,
and equipment that have been largely effective at preventing a repeat. Forrestal particularly was a milestone in the Navy’s change of approach toward firefighting.
The
aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and embarked Carrier Air Wing
(CVW) 11 transits into San Diego prior to mooring at Naval Air Station
North IslandHowever, the “entirely preventable” 2008 fire aboard USS George Washington
(CVN 73) was a grim reminder that even the most ironclad regulations
and procedures can sometimes be no match for fatigue, laziness,
ignorance, or haste, not to mention freak accidents. George Washington‘s fire, which originated below decks and
fortunately did not involve weapons, resulted in $70 million in damages
and 37 sailors injured, but no fatalities. In wartime, as other carriers
can attest, adding weapons and aviation fuel to any of those human
factors can make the outcome far more deadly.
My Dad was a GMM3 aboard the USS Bennington (CVA-20) in charge of one of the aft starboard 5 inch guns below the flight deck. He was aboard on his 20th birthday May 26, 1954 when the hydraulic catapults exploded off the coast of Rhode Island. The initial blast set off secondary explosions in the magazines that were directly below. 103 dead, over 200 injured. He told me the story like this: he was on KP that morning in the aft galley, running the potato peeling machine. He said he heard and felt the explosions, then the fire alarms went off. He tried to go forward to assist but was turned back for his own safety. He was not allowed to even go to his damage control station. Dad told me when they got back to port, he was able to go see the damage to the flight deck, all twisted and buckled. He never spoke of the removal of the dead and injured, but I'm sure it was "all hands" once they got back to Quonset Point. As a FF/EMT, I can only imagine such a mass casualty incident. On my blog I have an article that was published in a quarterly membership magazine that I made into a blog post with a story about Dad and a couple of Navy photos.
Hey Mr. Pilecki; I went and read up on that ship and I never heard of that incident until I saw your post. Shame they sold that ship to India for scrap in 1994.
I served on the O-Boat. Wasn't onboard during the fire, but the story, of the fire, certainly flowed onboard; Especially with the lifers that were onboard at the time.
That is something when you deal with a ship or anything like that, it is the lifers that pass on the "tribal" knowledge that never seems to be written down but the knowledge gets passed down to the new generation.
My Dad was a GMM3 aboard the USS Bennington (CVA-20) in charge of one of the aft starboard 5 inch guns below the flight deck. He was aboard on his 20th birthday May 26, 1954 when the hydraulic catapults exploded off the coast of Rhode Island. The initial blast set off secondary explosions in the magazines that were directly below. 103 dead, over 200 injured. He told me the story like this: he was on KP that morning in the aft galley, running the potato peeling machine. He said he heard and felt the explosions, then the fire alarms went off. He tried to go forward to assist but was turned back for his own safety. He was not allowed to even go to his damage control station. Dad told me when they got back to port, he was able to go see the damage to the flight deck, all twisted and buckled. He never spoke of the removal of the dead and injured, but I'm sure it was "all hands" once they got back to Quonset Point. As a FF/EMT, I can only imagine such a mass casualty incident. On my blog I have an article that was published in a quarterly membership magazine that I made into a blog post with a story about Dad and a couple of Navy photos.
ReplyDeletehttp://tfbel.blogspot.com/2019/03/an-enbloc-clip-of-dummy-rounds.html
There is a tribute video about the Bennington Disaster on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qot7VlqiglU
Hey Mr. Pilecki;
DeleteI went and read up on that ship and I never heard of that incident until I saw your post. Shame they sold that ship to India for scrap in 1994.
Yep, literally a miracle those ships made it back. Lessons learned then forgotten, then learned again... sadly...
ReplyDeleteHey Old NFO;
DeleteI figured you being a squid would get a lot out of that article.
I served on the O-Boat. Wasn't onboard during the fire, but the story, of the fire, certainly flowed onboard; Especially with the lifers that were onboard at the time.
ReplyDeleteHey d1zz;
DeleteThat is something when you deal with a ship or anything like that, it is the lifers that pass on the "tribal" knowledge that never seems to be written down but the knowledge gets passed down to the new generation.